Assessing the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on US Mortality: A County-Level Analysis
======================================================================================

* Andrew Stokes
* Dielle J. Lundberg
* Katherine Hempstead
* Irma T. Elo
* Samuel H. Preston

## Abstract

Covid-19 excess deaths refer to increases in mortality over what would normally have been expected in the absence of the Covid-19 pandemic. In this study, we take advantage of spatial variation in Covid-19 mortality across US counties to construct an Ordinary Least Squares regression model estimating its relationship with all-cause mortality. We then examine how the extent of excess mortality not assigned to Covid-19 varies across subsets of counties defined by demographic, structural, and policy characteristics. We estimate that 20.4% [95% CI (13.7%, 27.2%)] of excess deaths between February 1 and August 26, 2020 were ascribed to causes of death other than Covid-19 itself. Excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19 were even higher than predicted by our model in counties with high income inequality, low median income, low homeownership, and high percentages of Black residents, showing a pattern related to socioeconomic disadvantage and structural racism. Our work suggests that inequities in excess deaths attributable to Covid-19 may be even greater than revealed by data reporting deaths assigned to Covid-19 alone.

## Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is an international public health emergency caused by the respiratory droplet transmission of the coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) virus.1 Covid-19 infects humans through the lung epithelium and is associated with a high incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, vascular injury, and death.2 The United States has emerged as an epicenter of the pandemic, with 5.9 million confirmed cases and approximately 181,000 deaths as of August 27, 2020.3

Vital registration data on cause of death are likely to underestimate the mortality burden associated with the pandemic for several reasons.4,5 First, some direct deaths attributable to Covid-19 may be assigned to other causes of death due to an absence of widespread testing and low rates of diagnoses at the time of death.6 Second, direct deaths from unfamiliar complications of Covid-19 such as coagulopathy, myocarditis, inflammatory processes, and arrhythmias may have caused confusion and led to attributions of death to other causes, especially early in the pandemic.7–9 Third, Covid-19 death counts do not take into account the indirect consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic on mortality levels.10–12 Indirect effects may include increases in mortality resulting from reductions in access to and use of health care services and psychosocial consequences of stay-at-home orders.13 Increases in stress, depression, and substance use related to the pandemic could also lead to suicides and overdose deaths.14,15 Economic hardship, housing insecurity, and food insecurity may cause indirect deaths, especially among those living with chronic illnesses or who face acute heath emergencies and cannot afford medicines or medical supplies.16–18 On the other hand, the pandemic may reduce mortality as a result of reductions in travel and associated motor vehicle mortality.19 It is also possible that Covid-19 deaths are over-recorded in some instances, e.g., because some deaths that should have been assigned to influenza were instead assigned to Covid-19.

Estimates of excess deaths from all causes associated with the pandemic provide a useful measure of the total mortality burden associated with Covid-19. The term “excess deaths” refers to increases in mortality over what would normally have been expected based on historical norms for the period of analysis. Excess deaths include deaths directly assigned to Covid-19 on death certificates and excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19, which were either misclassified to other causes of deaths or were indirectly related to the Covid-19 pandemic. In summary, using deaths from all causes to measure the excess mortality impact of the Covid-19 epidemic can help circumvent biases in vital statistics, such as low Covid-19 testing rates, reporting lags, and differences in death certification coding practices,5 and capture excess deaths indirectly related to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Previous reports have estimated excess deaths in several different ways. The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) estimates excess mortality through comparison of mortality levels in 2020 to historical mortality data by week and geographic location.20 They present a range of values for excess deaths based on different historical thresholds, including the average expected count or upper boundary of the uncertainty interval, and apply weights to the 2020 provisional death data to account for incomplete data. In contrast, Weinberger et al. and Woolf et al. use multivariable Poisson regression models to evaluate increases in the occurrence of deaths due to any cause across the US.21,22 Weinberger et al. adjust for influenza activity.21 Kontis et al. apply Bayesian ensemble modeling to obtain smoothed estimates of excess deaths by age and sex in the UK.23 These studies make estimates for each spatial unit individually and do not allow any possible relationship between all-cause mortality and Covid-19 mortality to be identified through analysis across spatial units.

In this paper, we take advantage of spatial variation in Covid-19 mortality across US counties to estimate its relationship with all-cause mortality across all counties. We anticipate that counties with higher mortality from Covid-19 will also have experienced greater increases in mortality from other causes of death because the impact of the pandemic is not registered in Covid-19 deaths alone. We use the relationship between Covid-19 mortality and changing mortality from all causes of death to estimate excess mortality that was not directly assigned to Covid-19 as a cause of death. We then examine how the extent of excess mortality not assigned to Covid-19 varies across subsets of counties defined by area-level demographic, structural, and Covid-19 policy characteristics, allowing us to identify population subgroups with a disproportionate number of excess deaths that were not directly assigned to Covid-19. Our estimates provide an alternative approach to calculating excess deaths that can complement existing approaches.

## Methods

### Data Sources

We used NCHS provisional county-level data on all-cause mortality and directly assigned Covid-19 mortality from February 1 to August 26, 2020. 94% of deaths assigned to Covid-19 by NCHS have Covid-19 reported as the underlying cause of death; the other 6% have Covid-19 listed somewhere else on the death certificate.24 The data were limited to counties with 10 or more Covid-19 deaths and were considered provisional due to a time lag of up to 1 to 2 weeks between the occurrence of deaths and the completion, submission, and processing of death certificates. The number of counties included in the analysis was 898, and the exclusion criteria are detailed in Supplemental Figure 1. To construct a historical comparison period, we utilized county-level data from CDC Wonder reporting all-cause mortality each month from February to August for 2013 through 2018. We also used U.S. Census data on county population from 2013 to 2020 and data on demographic, structural, and policy factors from a variety of consolidated sources including the 2020 RWJ Foundation County Health Rankings. A list of these data sources is provided in Supplemental Table 1.

### Death Rates

We produced crude death rates for all-cause and directly coded Covid-19 mortality in 2020 using the reported death counts and the estimated county-level population on May 15, 2020. For historical death rates each year from 2013 to 2018, we added deaths from February to July of each year plus 26 of the 31 days in August and divided by the county-level population on May 15 of each year from 2013-2018. We estimated the population on May 15 of each year by interpolating between the population on July 1 of that year and July 1 of the prior year. We then took an average of the death rates from 2013 to 2018.

### Demographic, Structural, and Policy Factors

Prior literature has established that Covid-19 mortality may differ by demographic, structural, and Covid-19 policy factors.25,26 In this analysis, the demographic factor that we examined was population density (people per square miles). Structural factors included population distribution by race/ethnicity (% non-Hispanic Black, % non-Hispanic white), socioeconomic status (median household income), income inequality (ratio of household income at the 80th percentile to income at the 20th percentile), and housing (% homeownership). The Covid-19 policy factors included the timing of the outbreak (date on which the county reported 25+ Covid-19 cases), the timing of stay-at-home orders (date on which the state issued physical distancing stay-at-home orders), and testing (% of state population tested for Covid-19 as of August 26, 2020). For each variable, we calculated the weighted median based on the county population and produced a dichotomous indicator for upper vs. lower values. We further examined excess mortality by deciles of the county-level characteristics that were most closely associated with variation in excess mortality. We also explored differences between states that had Republican and Democratic Governors.

### Statistical Analysis

We first modeled the relationship between all-cause mortality and Covid-19 mortality using a model that allows both Covid and non-Covid sources of mortality change to be recognized:

![Formula][1]</img> 
The parameters of equation (1) were estimated using Ordinary Least Squares regression with county units weighted by their population size. The value of *α* represents changes in mortality that are independent of Covid-19 mortality and that are common across regions. The value of *β*1 represents the extent to which past levels of all-cause mortality in a county are replicated in 2020. If *β*1 = 1.0, for example, then all-cause mortality in 2020 is expected to be equal to that in 2013-18, plus or minus the value of *α*. Thus, combinations of *α* and *β*1 indicate how mortality changes that are not associated with Covid-19 vary with the level of all-cause mortality in 2013-18. The value of *β*2 indicates the extent to which mortality from Covid-19 affects all-cause mortality in 2020. If *β*2 = 1.0, it would imply that each death coded to Covid-19 would be associated with one additional death from all causes combined. Values of *β*2 greater than 1.0 would suggest that the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic in a county is not fully reflected in deaths assigned to Covid-19 and that excess deaths are being attributed to some other causes of death. Values of *β*2 less than 1.0 would suggest that Covid-19 is over-recorded as a cause of death or reductions in mortality are occurring for other causes. We did not control for age or other county-level factors in our analysis because the effect of these factors should be captured in the historical mortality term. In a sensitivity analyses, we excluded New York City where the death rate was the highest early in the pandemic. In further sensitivity analyses, we excluded counties with the lowest 25% of Covid-19 death rates and also performed the regression among all counties in the dataset, including the 25 counties that were eliminated by our study’s exclusion criteria. To assess the robustness of our results to alternative modeling approaches, we also estimated the relationship between Covid-19 and all-cause mortality using Weighted Least Squares and a Negative Binomial regression model.

To identify counties where excess mortality was higher or lower than predicted in our model, we calculated the residuals from our primary model and stratified the counties at the weighted median of each demographic, structural, or policy factor. Weighted means of the residuals were then calculated and compared for the residuals in each dichotomous category of upper or lower values, as stratified at the median. In a sensitivity analysis, we repeated this analysis using residuals from a Weighted Least Squares model and Pearson residuals from a Negative Binomial model. Lastly, we examined the residuals by deciles of the key demographic, structural, and Covid-19 policy factors.

## Results

Supplemental Table 2 presents characteristics of the 898 counties included in the dataset, whose distribution across the U.S. is visualized in Supplemental Figure 2. Among these counties, the population density was an average of 2,566 people per square mile. On average, the counties were 13.6% non-Hispanic Black and 56.4% non-Hispanic white. The median annual household income in the counties was $67,471, and the ratio of household income at the 80th percentile to income at the 20th percentile was 4.8. In the counties, 62.2% of residents were homeowners. The average date at which counties reached 25 Covid-19 cases was on March 23, 2020, and the average date state stay-at-home orders were issued was March 26, 2020. As of August 26, 2020, the average number of Covid-19 tests completed in each state included in the analysis was equal to 22.9% of the state population.

Figure 1 plots the difference between the 2020 all-cause mortality rate and the average 2013-2018 historical all-cause death rate against the Covid-19 mortality rate in the study counties. The area of each point is roughly proportional to the county’s population size. This figure presents Supplemental Table 3 presents coefficients of the model the level of Covid-19 mortality in a county.

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F1)

Figure 1. 
Difference Between the 2020 All-Cause Mortality Rate and 2013-2018 Historical Mortality Rate vs. 2020 Direct Covid-19 Mortality Rate (n=898)a,b

Supplemental Table 3 presents coefficients of the model describing the relationship between the directly assigned Covid-19 mortality rate and all-cause mortality in 2020. The estimated value of *α* is 0.318 deaths per 1000 people and *β*1 is 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.03). Given the observed range of 2013-18 death rates, this combination implies that, when Covid-19 mortality is set at zero, all-cause mortality is expected to have risen in all counties between 2013-18 and 2020. The coefficient of *β*2 is estimated to be 1.26 (95% CI, 1.15 to 1.36). This value suggests that, for every 100 deaths assigned to Covid-19, the number of all-cause deaths rose by 126. This result implies that 20.4% [95% CI, 13.7% to 27.2%] of all excess deaths were not directly assigned to Covid-19 on death certificates. In absolute terms, 160,069 directly assigned Covid-19 deaths were recorded in the 898 counties in the study, meaning there were 41,061 [95% CI, 24,040 to 58,083] excess deaths not directly assigned to Covid-19 for a total of 201,130 [95% CI, 184,109 to 218,152] excess deaths. Excluding counties in the lower 25% of Covid-19 deaths, the coefficient of *β*2 dropped to 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.29). Our results were relatively consistent across alternative modeling specifications, with the percent of excess deaths not attributed to Covid-19 ranging from 20.4% to 26.5% across Ordinary Least Squares, Weighted Least Squares, and Negative Binomial models (Supplemental Table 4).

Figure 2 examines county-level factors associated with higher or lower than predicted excess deaths not directly assigned to Covid-19 by calculating residuals from our primary model and taking the weighted mean across strata of demographic, structural, or policy factors. For demographic factors, excess deaths were higher than predicted by our model among counties with greater population density. For structural factors, excess deaths were higher than predicted by our model among counties with a greater proportion of non-Hispanic Black residents, a lower proportion of non-Hispanic white residents, lower median household incomes, greater income inequality, and less home ownership. Regarding Covid-19 policy factors, counties that had less testing and issued stay-at-home orders later had more excess deaths than predicted by our model. Lastly, excess deaths were higher than predicted by our model among states with Republican Governors. Supplemental Figure 3 presents the residuals calculated using alternative models including Weighted Least Squares and Negative Binomial regression.

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F2)

Figure 2. 
County-level factors associated with higher or lower than predicted excess mortalitya,b,c,d

Figure 3 uses deciles to examine in more detail the demographic and structural factors that are associated with higher and lower than predicted Covid-19 excess mortality. This analysis reveals that counties with very low population density had fewer excess deaths than predicted by our model. Results based on structural factors show a coherent pattern related to socioeconomic disadvantage: excess deaths are highest in counties with high income inequality, low median income, low homeownership, and high percentages of non-Hispanic Black residents.

![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F3)

Figure 3. 
Demographic and structural factors associated with higher or lower than predicted excess mortality, across high to low decilesa,b,c,d

Figure 4 shows the states with higher than predicted Covid-19 excess mortality not directly assigned to Covid-19. In order, these states are Arkansas, West Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Missouri, Mississippi, Kansas, New Mexico, Wisconsin, and Iowa. These states are predominantly in the Midwest or in the South.

![Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F4.medium.gif)

[Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20184036/F4)

Figure 4. 
States with higher or lower than predicted excess mortalitya,b,c,d,e

## Discussion

We estimated that 20.4% of excess deaths attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic were not assigned to Covid-19 on death certificates. Prior estimates of excess mortality not assigned to Covid-19 have varied. An analysis by Woolf et al., based on data from March 1 through April 25, 2020, found that of 87,001 excess deaths, 30,755 excess deaths or 35% were not assigned to Covid-19.22 Weinberger et al. identified 95,235 directly coded Covid-19 deaths through May 30, and 122,300 total excess deaths attributable to the pandemic.21 This indicated that 27,605 deaths or 22% of excess deaths were excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19. As of August 27, 2020, the NCHS identified 165,946 directly coded Covid-19 deaths and between 183,392 to 245,305 total excess deaths.27 This data suggests that between 9.5% and 32.4% of excess deaths were not directly assigned to Covid-19.

Our estimates of excess deaths may be lower than estimates by Weinberger et al. and Woolf et al. for several reasons. First, our analysis extends to August 26, 2020 while their analyses pertain to earlier periods. Weinberger et al. show that their estimates of excess deaths decline sharply as time advances.21 Our estimates are in the middle of the range suggested by NCHS, whose analysis also extends to August. Second, our estimates directly attempt to separate Covid-19 mortality from levels and trends in causes of death unrelated to Covid-19 while the other estimates do not incorporate such a direct separation. Third, our analytic approach is affected by measurement error in Covid-19 mortality in a way that differs from its effect on other estimates. In general, random measurement error in an independent variable (such as Covid-19 mortality in our analysis) is expected to bias the coefficient of that variable towards the null, or zero.28 If our estimate of *β*2 is biased downwards, then we will have underestimated the magnitude of excess deaths.

Our estimates predict that mortality would have risen between 2013-18 and 2020 even in the absence of the Covid-19 pandemic. This prediction is consistent with a rising trend in national crude death rates between 2013 and 2019. The crude death rate rose from 821.5 deaths per 100,000 people in the year 2013 to 867.8 deaths per 100,000 people in 2018.29 This increase is likely attributable primarily to population aging.

As noted earlier, excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19 could include deaths involving Covid-19 that were misclassified to other causes of death and deaths indirectly related to the Covid-19 pandemic. The NCHS has made an effort to examine excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19 by cause of death. As of August 27, 2020, NCHS has attributed 25,037 excess deaths to Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, 13,690 excess deaths to hypertensive diseases, 9,073 excess deaths to ischemic heart disease, 8,869 excess deaths to diabetes, and 2,942 excess deaths to influenza and pneumonia.27 These estimates suggest that the majority of excess deaths identified in this study were likely assigned to Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias or various circulatory diseases and diabetes. It is possible that a substantial fraction of the deaths of individuals with pre-existing chronic conditions who acquire Covid-19 and die as a result are ascribed to the pre-existing condition. These may constitute many of the excess deaths not attributed to Covid-19.

Areas with an exceptionally high number of excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19 may reflect a lack of testing facilities or co-morbidities that acquire priority in the assignment of cause of death. Indirect deaths, such as suicide or drug overdose and deaths related to reduced use of health care services, may also be higher in these areas. The frequency of excess deaths not attributed to Covid-19 was higher in some midwestern and southern states, in states with less Covid-19 testing, with Republican governors, and which issued stay-at-home orders later. These political distinctions may be associated with testing, diagnostic, and coding differences that have yet to be identified. They could also relate to how governors of different political affiliations have approached the reopening of the economy and enforcement of public health provisions such as social distancing and mask wearing.30,31 Analyses of multiple cause-of-death data, when available, will help shed additional light on the contribution of Covid-19 to US mortality.

Previous research has shown that counties with a higher percentage of Black residents have reported more mortality attributable to Covid-19.25,32 According to underlying cause of death data, Black people are 2.5 times more likely to die from Covid-19 than white people.33 Racial inequities in Covid-19 mortality relate to structural racism that has made Black people more likely to be exposed to Covid-19 at work, in transportation, and in housing during the pandemic.25,32,34,35 Another factor is racial health inequities in asthma, COPD, hypertension and diabetes, which are risk factors for Covid-19.36,37 The presence of these comorbidities may also reduce the likelihood of assigning Covid-19 as a cause of death. In fact, our analysis suggests that the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the Black population is understated when studying data reporting deaths assigned to Covid-19 alone, since counties with higher proportion of Black residents also have more excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19. Such excess mortality goes beyond the 26 excess deaths not attributed to Covid-19 for every 100 directly assigned Covid-19 deaths. When considering the addition of excess mortality not directly attributed to Covid-19, our work suggests that racial inequities in excess deaths attributable to Covid-19 may be even greater than currently understood.

A major limitation of this analysis is that the 2020 all-cause mortality and Covid-19 mortality data used were provisional. Counties may have differential delays in reporting death certificate data that vary by county, state, rurality, or other area-level factors. In particular, counties that are currently reporting lower all-cause mortality in 2020 than in the historical period likely have incomplete data. Another challenge was that the majority of counties in the study had fewer than 50 directly assigned covid-19 deaths. Although NCHS excluded counties with under 10 directly assigned Covid-19 deaths, this only partially addressed the uncertainty caused by small numbers. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis in which we excluded counties in the lower 25% of Covid-19 deaths. While the coefficient of *β*2 did drop in this scenario, the confidence intervals still overlapped with our primary estimate calculated without the exclusions. Furthermore, the demographic, structural, and policy factors examined in this analysis were based on data from 2012 through 2018. County-level distribution of these factors may have changed between that time and 2020 when the mortality data was gathered and analyzed.

Although lower than some previously published studies, our findings suggest that the overall mortality burden of Covid-19 considerably exceeds reported Covid-19 deaths. Using provisional vital statistics county-level data on Covid-19 and all-cause mortality in 2020 from the NCHS, we estimate that 20.4% of all excess deaths in the United States from February 1 to August 26, 2020 were excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19. We also found that the number of excess deaths not assigned to Covid-19 differed by county-level factors including socioeconomic disadvantage and structural racism. As the impact of Covid-19 spreads over a broader swath of U.S. counties, many of which re-opened early and have struggled with testing and their overall response, the analysis of excess deaths will continue to be a valuable proxy measure for assessing the overall mortality burden of Covid-19. This study highlights the importance of considering excess deaths beyond those directly assigned to Covid-19 within the overall assessment of the mortality impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and provides a new method for doing so.

## Data Availability

All data used in this manuscript are publicly available with the exception of the 2020 county population data, which are available through a special request to the U.S. Census Bureau. Further details about the data used in this analysis are provided at the linked GitHub repository.

[https://github.com/pophealthdeterminantslab/covid-19-county-analysis](https://github.com/pophealthdeterminantslab/covid-19-county-analysis) 

## Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Stokes reported receiving grants from Ethicon Inc outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

## Disclaimer

The interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

## Acknowledgements

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation supported the research reported in this publication. Elo was also supported by National Institute on Aging R01 AG060115 “Causes of Geographic Divergence in American Mortality Between 1990 and 2015: Health Behaviors, Health Care Access and Migration.”

The authors would like to thank Dana Glei, Jennifer Weuve, Wubin Xie, and Jacob Bor for their valuable feedback on the manuscript.

*   Received August 31, 2020.
*   Revision received August 31, 2020.
*   Accepted September 2, 2020.


*   © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.Fauci AS, Lane HC, Redfield RR. Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted. New Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMe2002387
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMe2002387&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32109011&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

2.  2.Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10239):1763–1770. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32442528&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

3.  3.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;3099(20):19–20. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32087114&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

4.  4.Banerjee A, Pasea L, Harris S, et al. Estimating excess 1-year mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic according to underlying conditions and age: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1715–1725. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30854-0
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30854-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

5.  5.Leon DA, Shkolnikov VM, Smeeth L, Magnus P, Pechholdová M, Jarvis CI. COVID-19: a need for real-time monitoring of weekly excess deaths. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):e81. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30933-8
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30933-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

6.  6.Gill JR, DeJoseph ME. The Importance of Proper Death Certification During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. 2020;06032. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.9536
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2020.9536&link_type=DOI) 

7.  7.Del Pinto R, Ferri C, Mammarella L, et al. Increased cardiovascular death rates in a COVID-19 low prevalence area. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). August 2020. doi:10.1111/jch.14013
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jch.14013&link_type=DOI) 

8.  8.Boukhris M, Hillani A, Moroni F, et al. Cardiovascular Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Perspective. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(7):1068–1080. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.018
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.018&link_type=DOI) 

9.  9.Driggin E, Madhavan M V, Bikdeli B, et al. Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients, Health Care Workers, and Health Systems During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(18):2352–2371. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.031
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo0OiJhY2NqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI3NS8xOC8yMzUyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDkvMDIvMjAyMC4wOC4zMS4yMDE4NDAzNi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

10. 10.Noymer A. Twitter Thread, March 22. [https://twitter.com/andrewnoymer/status/1241620288825167874?lang=en](https://twitter.com/andrewnoymer/status/1241620288825167874?lang=en). Published 2020. Accessed June 24, 2020.
    
    

11. 11.Baum A, Schwartz MD. Admissions to Veterans Affairs Hospitals for Emergency Conditions During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. 2020;324(1):96–99. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.9972
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2020.9972&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32501493&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

12. 12.Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A, DeVies J, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(23):699–704. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32525856&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

13. 13.Raker EJ, Zacher M, Lowe SR. Lessons from Hurricane Katrina for predicting the indirect health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(23):12595–12597. doi:10.1073/pnas.2006706117
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTE3LzIzLzEyNTk1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDkvMDIvMjAyMC4wOC4zMS4yMDE4NDAzNi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

14. 14.Sher L. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide rates. QJM. June 2020. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa202
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/qjmed/hcaa202&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

15. 15.Dubey MJ, Ghosh R, Chatterjee S, Biswas P, Chatterjee S, Dubey S. COVID-19 and addiction. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):817–823. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.008
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.008&link_type=DOI) 

16. 16.Wolfson JA, Leung CW. Food Insecurity and COVID-19: Disparities in Early Effects for US Adults. Nutrients. 2020;12(6). doi:10.3390/nu12061648
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/nu12061648&link_type=DOI) 

17. 17.Mann FD, Krueger RF, Vohs KD. Personal economic anxiety in response to COVID-19. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;167:110233. doi:[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110233](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110233)
    
    

18. 18.Prime H, Wade M, Browne DT. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am Psychol. 2020;75(5):631–643. doi:10.1037/amp0000660
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037/amp0000660&link_type=DOI) 

19. 19.Shilling F, Waetjen D. Special Report (Update): Impact of COVID19 Mitigation on Numbers and Costs of California Traffic Crashes. 2020.
    
    

20. 20.National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19: Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm). Published 2020. Accessed June 21, 2020.
    
    

21. 21.Weinberger DM, Chen J, Cohen T, et al. Estimation of Excess Deaths Associated With the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States, March to May 2020. JAMA Intern Med. July 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3391
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3391&link_type=DOI) 

22. 22.Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Sabo RT, Weinberger DM, Hill L. Excess Deaths From COVID-19 and Other Causes, March-April 2020. JAMA. July 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.11787
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2020.11787&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32609307&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom) 

23. 23.Kontis V, Bennett JE, Parks RM, et al. Age- and sex-specific total mortality impacts of the early weeks of the Covid-19 pandemic in England and Wales: Application of a Bayesian model ensemble to mortality statistics. *medRxiv*. 2020.
    
    

24. 24.National Center for Health Statistics. Technical Notes: Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/tech_notes.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/tech_notes.htm). Published 2020. Accessed August 27, 2020.
    
    

25. 25.Chen JT, Krieger N. Revealing the unequal burden of COVID-19 by income, race/ethnicity, and household crowding: US county vs. ZIP code analyses. Harvard Cent Popul Dev Stud Work Pap Ser. 2020;19(1).
    
    

26. 26.Office of National Statistics. Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by occupation, England and Wales: deaths registered up to and including 20 April 2020. 2020;(April):1-12. [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19relateddeathsbyoccupationenglandandwales/deathsregistereduptoandincluding20april2020](https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19relateddeathsbyoccupationenglandandwales/deathsregistereduptoandincluding20april2020).
    
    

27. 27.National Center for Health Statistics. Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19. [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess\_deaths.htm](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm). Published 2020. Accessed June 17, 2020.
    
    

28. 28.Davies RB, Hutton B. The Effect of Errors in the Independent Variables in Linear Regression. Biometrika. 1975;62(2):383–391. doi:10.2307/2335377
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/biomet/62.2.383&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1975AM41200019&link_type=ISI) 

29. 29.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Underlying Cause of Death 1999-2018 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released in 2020. WONDER Online Database. [http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html](http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html). Published 2020. Accessed July 13, 2020.
    
    

30. 30.Adolph C, Amano K, Bang-Jensen B, Fullman N, Wilkerson J. Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19. *medRxiv*. January 2020:2020.03.30.20046326. doi:10.1101/2020.03.30.20046326
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoibWVkcnhpdiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoyMToiMjAyMC4wMy4zMC4yMDA0NjMyNnYxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDkvMDIvMjAyMC4wOC4zMS4yMDE4NDAzNi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

31. 31.Painter M, Qiu T. Political beliefs affect compliance with covid-19 social distancing orders. Available SSRN 3569098. 2020.
    
    

32. 32.Chen JT, Waterman PD, Krieger N. COVID-19 and the unequal surge in mortality rates in Massachusetts, by city/town and ZIP Code measures of poverty, household crowding, race/ethnicity,and racialized economic segregation. Harvard Cent Popul Dev Stud Work Pap Ser. 2020;19(2). [https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/05/09/nation/disparities-push-coronavirus-death-rates-](https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/05/09/nation/disparities-push-coronavirus-death-rates).
    
    

33. 33.The Covid Tracking Project. The COVID Racial Data Tracker. [https://covidtracking.com/race](https://covidtracking.com/race). Published 2020. Accessed July 14, 2020.
    
    

34. 34.Goldstein JR, Atherwood S. Indirectly Standardization of Covid-19 Mortality Disparities by Race/Ethnicity. Work Pap. 2020.
    
    

35. 35.Bassett M, Chen JT, Krieger N. Working Paper, The Unequal Toll of Covid-19 Mortality by Age in the United States: Quantifying Racial/Ethnic Disparities.; 2020.[https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1266/2020/06/20\_Bassett-Chen-Krieger\_COVID-19\_plus\_age\_working-paper\_0612\_Vol-19\_No-3\_with-cover.pdf](https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1266/2020/06/20\_Bassett-Chen-Krieger\_COVID-19\_plus\_age\_working-paper\_0612_Vol-19_No-3_with-cover.pdf).
    
    

36. 36.Mendy A, Apewokin S, Wells AA, Morrow AL. Factors Associated with Hospitalization and Disease Severity in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population of COVID-19 Patients. medRxiv Prepr Serv Heal Sci. June 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.06.25.20137323
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoibWVkcnhpdiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoyMToiMjAyMC4wNi4yNS4yMDEzNzMyM3YyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDkvMDIvMjAyMC4wOC4zMS4yMDE4NDAzNi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

37. 37.Price-Haywood EG, Burton J, Fort D, Seoane L. Hospitalization and Mortality among Black Patients and White Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):2534–2543. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa2011686
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMsa2011686&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F09%2F02%2F2020.08.31.20184036.atom)

 [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif