Abstract
Mandatory energy (calorie) labelling of alcoholic drinks is a public health measure that could be used to address both alcohol consumption and obesity. We used systematic review methodology to assess evidence from studies examining 1) consumer knowledge of the energy content of alcoholic drinks, 2) public support for energy labelling and 3) experiments examining the effect of energy labelling of alcoholic drinks on consumption behaviour. Levels of evidence level were evaluated using the GRADE approach. Eighteen eligible studies (from 16 sources) were included. Among studies examining consumer knowledge of the energy content of alcoholic drinks (N=8) and support for energy labelling (N=9), there was consistent evidence that people tend to be unaware of the energy content of alcoholic drinks, and were more likely to support than oppose energy labelling of alcoholic drinks. The level of evidence supporting these conclusions was rated as moderate due to the majority of studies being of low methodological quality. Six studies examined the effect of energy labelling on outcome measures related to alcohol drinking. Overall, findings were indicative of no likely effect of energy labelling on outcome measures. However, the majority of studies were of low methodological quality, used proxy outcome measures of alcohol drinking and none of the studies were conducted in real-world settings, so the level of evidence supporting this conclusion was classed as very low. Further research is required to determine whether energy labelling of alcoholic drinks affects consumer behaviour and is likely to be an effective public health policy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: No external funding.
Conflicts of Interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest. ER has previously received funding from the American Beverage Association and Unilever for projects unrelated to the present research.
Data Availability
The pre-registered protocol for the review is available at https://osf.io/8gpm5/ and data tables are reported in the appendix.
