Abstract
Objectives To determine any change in referral patterns and outcomes in children (0-18) referred for child protection medical examination (CPME) during the covid-19 pandemic compared to previous years.
Design Retrospective observational study, analysing routinely collected clinical data from CPME reports in a rapid response to the pandemic lockdown.
Setting Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, which provides all routine CPME for Birmingham, England, population 1.1 million including 288,000 children.
Participants Children aged under 18 years attending CPME during an 18 week period from late February to late June during the years 2018, 2019, and 2020.
Main Outcome Measures Numbers of referrals, source of disclosure and outcomes from CPME
Results There were 78 CPME referrals in 2018, 75 in 2019 and 47 in 2020, this was a 39.7% (95%CI 12.4-59.0) reduction in referrals from 2018 to 2020, and a 37.3% (95%CI 8.6-57.4) reduction from 2019 to 2020. There were fewer CPME referrals initiated by school staff in 2020, 12(26%) compared to 36 (47%) and 38 (52%) in 2018 and 2019 respectively. In all years 75.9% of children were known to social care prior to CPME, and 94% of CPME concluded that there were significant safeguarding concerns.
Conclusions School closure due to covid-19 may have harmed children as child abuse has remained hidden. There needs to be either mandatory attendance at schools in future or viable alternatives found. There may be a significant increase in safeguarding referrals when schools fully re-open as children disclose the abuse they have experienced at home.
Article summary: Strengths and Limitations of the Study
This is a highly robust study: we obtained CPME reports for 97% of CPME referrals during the study period.
We ensured consistency of data extraction by double reviewing every report, with further consensus discussions for the few cases that raised uncertainties.
The team extracting the data comprised highly experienced paediatricians with expertise in child abuse.
One weakness is that we only considered minor injuries from outpatient CPME, excluding those admitted to hospital, so our findings do not include those with more serious NAI, however they would be taken to hospital for treatment due to the severity of their injuries.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was not funded. JG is funded by West Midlands Clinical Research Network (NIHR) as a Clinical Trials Scholar. MP is supported by the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The University of Birmingham funded the article processing charge.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study involved clinicians analysing routinely collected patient data, from patients within their own clinical service, it therefore does not require HRA ethical approval. The study was approved by the Research and Innovation Department in Birmingham Community Healthcare Trust.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Joanna.garstang{at}nhs.net, g.debelle{at}nhs.net, indu.anand{at}nhs.net, jane.armstrong2{at}nhs.net, emily.botcher{at}nhs.net, helenchaplin{at}nhs.net, N.N.Hallett{at}bham.ac.uk, cmorgans{at}nhs.net, m.price{at}bham.ac.uk, e.tan{at}nhs.net, emily.tudor{at}nhs.net
Data Availability
Data are drawn from clinical child protection reports of individual children and cannot be shared. The disaggregated and anonymised abstraction files may be shared at reasonable request from the first author
