ICU admissions and in-hospital deaths linked to covid-19 in the Paris region are correlated with previously observed ambient temperature

Introduction

The ongoing major epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) infection is mainly located in cold areas of temperate countries of the northern hemisphere,¹ which raises the question of weather influence.

Continental France has been severely hit by this outbreak of covid-19, with around 30 000 deaths, including more than 19 000 in-hospital deaths (as of 15 June 2020). The main affected regions being hit were its eastern region (mainly Alsace) and the Paris region (Île de France) with, respectively, more than 3500 and 7200 in-hospital deaths.

Monitoring the outbreak of covid-19 with biological testing is imprecise as the infection can be asymptomatic.² Data such as deaths or intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (reflecting critically ill patients) are more reliable, especially in highly developed countries. In the natural course of infection with covid-19, a pulmonary worsening may appear around 5 to 9 days after infection onset,^2,3 with an immunological mechanism known as “cytokine storm”¹ that may lead to a hospitalization. Subsequently, death may occur at different moments (depending on hospitalization, ICU admission, and ventilation). The median duration of hospitalization before death is around 9 days³ in covid-19 critically ill patients in a highly developed country, therefore death should occur around 14 to 18 days after the onset of infection, although it can of course happen much later. Weather effect, if existing, could influence a patient’s ICU admission or death the same day of occurrence, and the days before. Once a patient is hospitalized, no weather effect should be seen in highly developed countries if hospital ambient air is regulated (which is the case in France).

To study the hypothesis of a weather effect on severity indicators of covid-19, we tested the correlation between these indicators and weather characteristics in a single area with a high-density population and a heavy burden.

Methods

Statistical analysis

Hospital data were correlated to meteorological factors of Paris midtown. A bivariate analysis was performed and Pearson’s correlation coefficients calculated. The significance level was set at 5%. A correlation coefficient >0.7 was considered as very strong, 0.7 to 0.5 as strong, 0.5 to 0.3 as mild, and <0.30 as weak. Meteorological factors were correlated against hospital data on the same day, as death or iCU admission can happen on arrival at the hospital. As weather may have influenced the prognosis of patients before hospitalization, we sequentially tested daily hospital data with the weather observed from 1 to 19 day(s) before ICU admission or death. The period from 31 March 31 to 10 May 2020 was chosen because it corresponds to stabilization of the outbreak following the national lockdown. During this 41-day period, they were 4355 ICU admissions and 5641 deaths in the Paris region (Figure 1). Weather characteristics were therefore observed from 12 March until 10 May. We also assessed a longer period (62 days), with hospital data from 31 March to 31 May and weather data from 12 March to 31 May (a total of 4689 ICU admissions and 6299 deaths).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 1. Paris-Region daily covid-19 ICU-Admissions and in-Hospital-Deaths Curves.

The statistical analyses were performed with R software version V4.0.0.

Results

No statistical correlations were found between sunshine or rain and ICU admissions or in-hospital deaths during the 41-day study period. There was a negative correlation with minimal, mean, and maximal temperatures with both outcomes (Figure 2). This correlation was considered strong/very strong (with all three temperatures) for ICU admissions from day –12 to day –6, with the highest correlation at day –8. This correlation was considered strong/very strong for in-hospital deaths from day −16 to day −11 (with all three temperatures) with the highest correlation at day −15. Correlations were statistically significant for most of the considered period Table 1), even more so for correlations between ICU admissions and temperature (Table 2).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 2. Correlation coefficients of midtown Paris temperatures and (A) daily ICU admissions and (B) in-hospital deaths in the Paris region. In ordinate is Correlation coefficient (0 to –1), in abscissa (days D –19 to 0).

A temperature drop preceded the peak of ICU admissions and in-hospital deaths (Figure 3), with the highest correlation coefficients (−0.767 and −0.736, respectively, for mean temperature) corresponding to a time lag of 8 and 15 days, respectively. There was a second, smaller peak for ICU admissions at day –2, and a second peak of correlated in-hospital deaths at day –8.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 3. Evolution of (A) ICU admissions and (B) daily death tolls superimposed with mean environmental temperatures observed 8 days before ICU admission and 15 days before death (as these showed the highest correlation coefficients). Left ordinate is daily toll (0–350), right ordinate is temperature (0–25 °C).

The longer study period (62 days) also showed a negative correlation between severity indicators and all three temperatures (maximal correlation coefficients at around –14 to –15 days for deaths and –8 days for ICU admissions) with significant P values, but with weaker correlation coefficients (data not shown).

Discussion

The findings of this study suggest that severity indicators of the covid-19 outbreak strongly correlated with ambient temperatures in the Paris region. France has a mainly oceanic climate, which is shared by most of Western Europe (UK, Belgium, Netherlands, and Germany).

Many early studies,^6-9 from different continents and settings, have linked severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) transmission to meteorological factors. Each 1 °C increase in average ambient temperature and in diurnal temperature range reduced the number of daily cases in China,⁶ whereas a specific absolute humidity of around 6 g/m³ favoured transmission. Prata et al.⁷ described a significant linear negative relationship between confirmed cases of covid-19 and ambient temperature from 16.8 °C to 25.8 °C (with a threshold above 25.8 °C where the infection curve became flat). Also, the epidemic intensity decreased following days at a higher temperature (with a time lag), and the peak of infections was at approximately 10 °C.⁸ This finding does not necessarily suggest that lower temperature per se affects the virus, as it also modifies human activities. The interactions between ambient temperature, humidity, wind, and hours of sunshine are complex, and are not the purpose of this article. Sajadi et al.⁹ found that relative humidity (44% to 84%) and mean temperature (5 °C to 11 °C) before the first deaths were similar in February in eight different cities (which later became the main hotspots of the outbreak at that time). Most of these studies, however, relied on biologically confirmed infections, which are known to depend widely on the biological testing policy and the ability to do it. In France, as elsewhere, biological testing was very limited at the beginning of the pandemic, and only approximately 200 000 patients were confirmed positive, whereas between 3 and 6 million patients were likely to have been infected.

Ma et al.,¹⁰ in a study from Wuhan, reported a significant negative association with ambient temperature and absolute humidity on daily deaths from covid-19. However, although they tested a lagged effect, the maximum lag was only 5 days between the environmental factors tested and the day of death. This does not fit with the course of pathology from this disease, as death often occurs later (and much later in case of hospitalization, which extends patient survival, at least in highly developed countries). They did not find any effect of air pollutants on death, but some authors hypothesized that pollution could favour spread of the virus.¹¹ Death monitoring may also be imprecise, but is quite reliable in highly developed countries and we sought to work on reliable data from France. With regards to the death toll, we chose to focus on in-hospital deaths, which are more precise for the date of occurrence and the cause. Hospital admission thresholds differ among countries, and depend on hospital beds per capita, ventilator availability, and access to healthcare. Within a country, it depends on patient categorization (mainly age and disease severity). Consistent with this, we found different day peaks of death, consistent with the course of hospitalization and the different types of patients. Between 34.6% and 55.9% of patients with covid-19 are hospitalized, but are not admitted to the ICU or have to undergo mechanical ventilation.¹² The smaller peak observed at day –8 for deaths likely corresponds to fragile hospitalized patients who die early. Some patients are not even admitted to the ICU for ventilation therapy, which is often a single “yes or no” decision. We found that ambient temperatures at day –8 correlated most strongly with ICU admissions, whereas temperatures at day –15 correlated most closely with in-hospital deaths. The difference of 7 days therefore corresponds to the median time between ICU admission and in-hospital death in Paris region.

Humidity and temperature influence survival of influenza virus, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV, as well as droplet stabilization, propagation in nasal mucosa, human immunity,^9,13 and human way-of-life (i.e. indoor and outdoor activities). Therefore, a respiratory outbreak has multifactorial drivers and the number and importance of each of these factors is not only unknown, but may also vary between countries and climes. Models show that while climate may influence this outbreak and/or its severity in a particular location, other factors such as population immunity¹³ are crucial for a potential seasonality. Also, public health controls (school closures, restricting mass gatherings, social distancing) play a major role and likely have a greater effect compared with climate.¹⁴

Although our results clearly indicate a link between temperature and severity indicators of covid-19, our study does not provide clear answers to the precise effect of temperature. It may be responsible for a greater number of infections that eventually lead to a greater number of deaths, or it may only be responsible for more severe infections, or it may affect both.

Conclusion

Across Europe and the rest of the world, several factors potentially contribute to the severity of this pandemic. Our findings suggest that weather may contribute to the rise and fall of this outbreak in temperate countries of the northern hemisphere and this could indicate a likely resurgence next winter. Therefore, social distancing should be maintained on a long-term basis. Temperature is a strong driver of this outbreak and may influence both viral spread and case fatality. Our results also indicate that covid-19 deaths may increase soon in the southern hemisphere, with an austral winter.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Credit authorship contribution statement

Mehdi Mejdoubi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing -- original draft. Xavier Kyndt: Methodology, review editing. Mehdi Djennaoui: Methodology, Software, Data curation, review editing.