Abstract
Objective This study therefore examines the role knowledge on legal abortion and other factors play in the choice of abortion methods among women within a ten-year period.
Design The study use data from the 2007 and 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Surveys. A total sample of 2,432 women aged 15-49 whose activities related to their most recent induced abortion were selected. This study, however, limits the analysis to a subpopulation of women who have terminated a pregnancy between 2002 to 2007 and 2012 to 2017. The made use of binary logistic regression analysis to show the relationship between choice of abortion methods and knowledge of legality of abortion.
Setting Ghana
Participants Women who had practice induce abortion
Main outcome measure Choice of Abortion methods
Results Likelihood of unsafe abortion practices was high among women who had knowledge on legality of abortion, women with no formal education, single women, rural women and women whose partners did not know about the pregnancy.
Conclusion Increasing knowledge of legal status on abortion among women corresponded with an increased in the use of unsafe abortion methods over the decade has implication for poor reproductive health outcome and increased maternal mortality among women in Ghana.
Strengths and limitations of the study
► Use of two rounds of nationally representative data to show knowledge of women on legality abortion that can be generalized.
► Measurement of Safe and Unsafe Abortion methods which involved combination safe and safe provider, place of abortion and methods of abortion which reflect a robust measurement of abortion.
► Interesting outcome of high unsafe abortion practices among women who have good knowledge on the legality of abortion under some circumstances
► The use of secondary data prevented us from including other important variables in our study to was one major limitation of our study
► Another limitation includes the inability to explore further using qualitative methods that will provide detailed explanation to the reasons of high unsafe abortion practices among highly knowledgeable women of legality of abortion
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research form any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ICF Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the protocol for the 2007 and 2017 GMHSs.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data relevant to the study uploaded as supplementary information. Data is however openly available and can be accessed via https://dhsprogram.com/