Abstract
Background Applicants for radiology residency programs consider various factors when completing their ranking lists of programs. However, in making their decision, there is usually minimal objective data that can guide applicants in creating their rank list.
Purpose The goal of the study is to determine which factors in order of importance lead to the decision to rank one residency program over the other.
Methods This study was an anonymous, cross-sectional study conducted through an online survey. Emails were sent out to applicants who had interviewed at the University of Texas Medical Branch’s Diagnostic Radiology department the day after match day. The survey consisted of a single open-ended question asking the survey taker to list four factors in order of importance that guided their program rank list. Results were compiled, tallied, and categorized to find common themes between the applicant’s preferences.
Results Of the 73 surveys sent out, a total of 30 applicants responded for a response rate of 41%. The most common “1st preference” factors were “Reputation,” “Location,” and “Work Environment,” with 23.33%, 20%, and 20% of applicants considering these the most important factors in ranking a program.
Conclusion Despite reputation being the most common “1st preference” factor, “Work Environment” was more commonly mentioned overall, being mentioned in 23.35% of all answers compared to “Reputation” 12.5%. These results, combined with the difficulty in changing a program’s location and reputation, make it clear that programs should focus on building and highlighting a healthy work environment to attract applicants.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB Exempt by UTMB IRB, IRB # 18-0198
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Principal Investigator Biography: Dr. Quan Nguyen attended medical school at the Tulane School of Medicine in New Orleans, LA. He completed his residency at State University of New York, Downstate in Brooklyn, NY, and a breast imaging fellowship at the University of Washington in Seattle, WA. Dr. Nguyen is a radiologist with sub specialization in breast imaging interested in the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
IRB: IRB Exempt by UTMB IRB, IRB # 18-0198
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.
