The remaining unknowns: A determination of the current research priorities for COVID-19 by the global health research community =============================================================================================================================== * Alice Norton * Arancha De La Horra Gozalo * Nicole Feune de Colombi * Moses Alobo * Juliette Mutheu Asego * Zainab Al-Rawni * Emila Antonio * James Parker * Wayne Mwangi * Colette Adhiambo * Kevin Marsh * Marta Tufet Bayona * Peter Piot * Trudie Lang ## Abstract **Background** In March 2020 the World Health Organisation (WHO) released a Global Research Roadmap in an effort to coordinate and accelerate the global research response to combat COVID-19 based on deliberations of 400 experts across the world. Three months on, the disease and our understanding have both evolved significantly. As we now tackle a pandemic in very different contexts and with increased knowledge, we sought to build on the work of the WHO to gain a more current and global perspective on these initial priorities. **Methods and findings** We undertook a mixed methods study seeking the views of the global research community to i) assess which of the early WHO roadmap priorities are still most pressing; ii) understand whether they are still valid in different settings, regions or countries; and iii) identify any new emerging priorities. Thematic analysis of the significant body of combined data shows the WHO roadmap is globally relevant, however, new important priorities have emerged, in particular, pertinent to low and lower-middle income countries (less resourced countries), where health systems are under significant competing pressures. We also found a shift from prioritising vaccine and therapeutic development towards a focus on assessing the effectiveness, risks, benefits and trust in the variety of public health interventions and measures. Our findings also provide insight into temporal nature of these research priorities, highlighting the urgency of research that can only be undertaken within the period of virus transmission, as well as other important research questions but which can be answered outside the transmission period. Both types of studies are key to help combat this pandemic but also importantly to ensure we are better prepared for the future. **Conclusions** We hope these findings will help guide decision making across the broad research system including the multi-lateral partners, research funders, public health practitioners, clinicians and civil society. ## Introduction COVID-19 was declared a public health emergency of international concern on 30th January 2020 (1) and then a global pandemic on 11th March 2020 (2). The World Health organisation (WHO) published their Global Research Roadmap (3) on 12th March 2020, within the context of the situation and the epicentre of infection at that time. The Roadmap was built on deliberations of the Global Research Forum, whereby 400 participants from different sectors across the world, identified 3-4 immediate research priorities for the following three months across each of 9 themes. Now, in June 2020 we see the evolution of this pandemic at different points across the globe. We know from our previous experience with Ebola and other outbreaks (4, 5) that it is essential to embed research into the response to an outbreak, and that there is a finite and unknown window where these questions can be answered. COVID-19 is an unprecedented situation and therefore we must take every opportunity to undertake all the possible research that funding and capabilities allow; and high-quality studies should happen everywhere there are cases in order to maximise the evidence generated and ensure that the resultant data and findings are globally applicable. Therefore, it is important to assess now, what are the most key remaining questions that need to be addressed, both to ensure this pandemic can be halted and to learn for future outbreaks of this pathogen or another. This research achieved its aim to determine the current global research priorities at this point in time to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic and to help learn for any future outbreaks. ## Methods An online multi-language survey was developed where ranking questions were coupled with open-ended questions. This was based on a previous survey led by the African Academy of Science (AAS) that was undertaken in March 2020 to assess how well the WHO priorities where applicable to Africa (6). Here we worked from the AAS survey so we could now assess whether the findings remained relevant across the globe, and if they had changed over time. Seventy-three potential priorities (41 from the original WHO document and 32 generated as part the AAS survey and consultations) were arranged under the nine topic headings used in the WHO Research Roadmap. Participants ranked their top three options for both short- and long-term priorities (18 total ranking questions). Free text boxes were provided under each of the broad topics, where participants were asked to list any research priority they felt was not included in the options provided. After the survey closed a virtual workshop was held to seek wider global comment and discussion on the survey findings and to discuss current priorities and unmet research areas. We conducted ten further open access workshops with research teams and health workers across the globe, led by the TGHN COVID-19 Research Implementation and Knowledge Hub between 14th April and 12th June 2020. These workshops meetings were recorded with permission of participants, and comments and questions captured. A thematic content analysis methodology was developed to report the findings of each (7). Here we applied this to the cumulative data of all 11 workshops to add to the survey data and better address the question: *what are the current global research priorities during the COVID19 pandemic?* ### Quantitative Data Analysis Methods Responses from the survey were download in excel format, all data was fully anonymised, password protected and access restricted to the study team. Descriptive analyses were undertaken within excel to provide a ranking score for each research priority for immediate and longer term, as per the survey. Priorities ranked as first were given a score of 3, those ranked second were given a score of 2 and those ranked third were given a score of 1. This analysis was conducted within the category headings from the WHO roadmap and included both the original WHO priorities and new priorities suggested in the AAS report. Therefore, these data show us how responders currently rank the priorities set within the WHO roadmap and the AAS report. The data were split for comparison between the global researcher responses and those originating from less-resourced settings. Within the less-resourced setting category, we include low and lower-middle countries as defined by the World Bank. ### Qualitative Data Analysis Method The aim of the open-ended survey was to determine whether there are new priorities that were not included in the original WHO roadmap or the AAS survey findings. These written comments were imported into NVivo qualitative data analysis package and we undertook a pragmatic thematic content analysis. Analysing the data from the workshops allowed a further open consideration of current research priorities as this step expanded beyond the limitation that the survey had of asking questions within the framework of the WHO roadmap. Following the methodology established after the first workshop (7) we compiled a dataset by transcribing the spoken and written comments from each workshop. A coding framework was generated through an inductive and then deductive approach, following the same categories used in the survey. ## Results In total, 1,528 individuals completed the online survey and 2,559 attended the workshops, from across 137 countries, ensuring representation from all of the WHO regions (African region = 612 (40%); Americas region = 279 (18%); Eastern Mediterranean region = 32 (2%); European region = 460 (30%); South East Asia region = 87 (6%); Western Pacific region = 58 (4%)). Participants were most commonly employed in academia (47%), hospitals (14%) research organisations (11%) and non-government organisations (10%). ### Current Global Ranking of the WHO Roadmap Priorities The survey results (Table 1) shows how priorities were ranked across the immediate and longer term within the WHO categories. We present these globally, along with a sub-group analysis of less resourced countries to understand whether there are differences in priorities for less resourced countries. View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/24/2020.06.24.20138198/T1) Table 1: Survey Results: Top three research priorities from the WHO Roadmap categories showing less resources countries as a sub-set of the global responses. The ranking of these priorities broadly indicates what researchers feel to be the most important research areas from the WHO roadmap at this point within this pandemic. The qualitative data from the survey and the workshops then provides further insight to guide where emphasis should be placed, particularly in low-resourced nations. The qualitative data analysis from the survey, workshops and working groups supported the existing WHO Roadmap and highlights where greater research emphasis is needed at this later point in the pandemic. However, most importantly new priorities have also come through from this study (Table 2). View this table: [Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/24/2020.06.24.20138198/T2) Table 2: Existing priorities now requiring greater research emphasis and new priorities not in the WHO Roadmap or AAS list ## Discussion These data suggest that that original WHO COVID-19 Research Roadmap remains broadly globally applicable. Here we also show which research questions require the most emphasis and also that potential new priorities have emerged that were not within the initial roadmap. Some new suggested priorities reflect the progress of the pandemic and acquisition of knowledge as to where the gaps lie; notably research in children, pregnancy, long-term health impacts of the disease and that there is a strong call for research that assesses the effectiveness of public health measurers put into place across the globe to reduce transmission of this virus. These were alongside a demand for greater social science research to determine public perception, and better ways to change behaviours and build trust. We also identified a range of new priorities relating to addressing COVID-19 in lower resource settings, where multiple pressures including ongoing endemic infectious diseases and other co-morbidities are competing within the health and policy systems for limited resources. Limitations of our approach include the fact that we built the questions to align with the original WHO broad priority headings, and this meant that some headings (for example the animal human interface) had relatively few suggested priorities while others (for example social sciences in the outbreak response) had much larger numbers. We also retained the original order of priorities from the WHO Research Roadmap and the AAS survey and this may have influenced the ranking given by respondents. The workshops however were open and purposefully invited researchers to make whatever comments they wanted in regard to where current research priorities lie. Therefore, taken together we suggest that these data support the importance of the WHO research roadmap approach and highlights where funders and researcher should be placing emphasis as well as identifying potential new areas that should be tackled within this pandemic. Given that no really effective antivirals have yet been identified, and with the prospect of a globally accessible vaccine being still some way off, the only interventions that have been deployable by countries are public health measures to prevent transmission. It is therefore unsurprising then that the survey respondents and workshop participants ranked highly the need for further studies to evaluate the value of such measures as well as studies on other potential interventions as they arise. These studies must be undertaken as quickly as possible if we are to gain evidence now on just how effective measures such as lockdown, handwashing and social distancing are on reducing transmission. These studies are needed in highly varied social contexts to understand the relative risks and benefits. The need for social science research and mixed methods came through very strongly, with an emphasis on determining how to gain the trust and successfully deliver public health messages. This needs evidence-based community engagement strategies; tested and evaluated everywhere. Consideration of both immediate and long-term priorities is important to address this specific pandemic and to better prepare for the future. There are studies that need ongoing transmission, at a high enough rate to answer the question they set. These might be essential for this pandemic, for example clinical trials to determine the efficacy of drugs or vaccines, or address questions to guide future outbreaks, such as evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions. Other studies do not need circulating virus, and could still guide the effort to address COVID-19 or might help for future pandemics. Fig 1 shows these four situations and gives examples. ![Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/06/24/2020.06.24.20138198/F1.medium.gif) [Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/24/2020.06.24.20138198/F1) Fig 1. Priority assessment matrix for research within the COVID-19 pandemic Consideration of these findings in the context of where we are now with the global shifting and evolution of the pandemic requires both research teams and funders to ensure research across all these key areas within this finite window. Here we have suggested a matrix that groups these priorities which might help guide resource allocation and research planning (Fig 1). This complements ongoing work by the UK Collaborative on Development Research and Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness to map research funding against the WHO roadmap priorities to enable funders and researchers identify gaps and opportunities and inform future research investments or coordination needs (8). Finally, we want to highlight both the importance of fully involving the global research community in priority setting, as well as the ongoing need to review priorities where knowledge and practice is advancing rapidly. Here we have shown that the global research community support the recommendations of the WHO research roadmap, but that important new priorities have emerged both due to the transition through the pandemic and consideration of differing global epidemiological, health system, policy and research contexts. ## Data Availability All data will be fully available without restriction. URLs/accession numbers/DOIs will be available only after acceptance of the manuscript for publication so that we can ensure their inclusion before publication. ## Acknowledgments We acknowledge and thank all survey and workshop participants for their contributions. * Received June 24, 2020. * Revision received June 24, 2020. * Accepted June 24, 2020. * © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s statement on IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) [cited 2020 June 6]. [Internet]]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov](https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov))). 2. 2.World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 [cited 2020 June 11]. [Internet]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19](https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19) 11-march-2020. 3. 3.World Health Organization. A COORDINATED GLOBAL RESEARCH ROADMAP: 2019 NOVEL CORONAVIRUS Geneva: World Health Organization; [cited 2020 June 11]. [Internet]]. Available from: [https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/Coronavirus\_Roadmap\_V9.pdf?ua=1](https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/Coronavirus_Roadmap_V9.pdf?ua=1). 4. 4.Lang T. Ebola: Embed research in outbreak response. Nature. 2015;524(7563):29–31. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/524029a&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26245565&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F06%2F24%2F2020.06.24.20138198.atom) 5. 5.Piot P, Soka MJ, Spencer J. Emergent threats: lessons learnt from Ebola. Int Health. 2019;11(5):334–7. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F06%2F24%2F2020.06.24.20138198.atom) 6. 6.The African Academy of Sciences. Research and Development goals for COVID-19 in Africa - The African Academy of Sciences Priority Setting Exercise [cited 2020 June 11]. Available from: [https://www.aasciences.africa/sites/default/files/2020-04/Research%20and%20Development%20Goals%20for%20COVID-19%20in%20Africa.pdf](https://www.aasciences.africa/sites/default/files/2020-04/Research%20and%20Development%20Goals%20for%20COVID-19%20in%20Africa.pdf). 7. 7.Tibenderana J, Alia J, Hamade P, Walker R, Feune De Colombi N, Al-Rawni Z, et al. Malaria and COVID-19: A rapid determination of unknowns and call for research. Paper submitted to MedRxiv Pre-print server on the 24th June 2020 - reference to be confirmed. 8. 8.The UK Collaborative on Development Research. COVID-19 Research Project Tracker by UKCDR & GloPID-R [cited 2020 June 11]. Internet]. Available from: [https://www.ukcdr.org.uk/funding-landscape/covid-19-research-project-tracker/](https://www.ukcdr.org.uk/funding-landscape/covid-19-research-project-tracker/).