ABSTRACT
Objectives This study explores the effect of patient clinical history taking, using a digital symptom assessment app, on patient flow.
Design, methods and participants We used a discrete event approach to simulate patient flow in an urgent care center.
Setting The base case: a small center with 2 triage nurses, 2 doctors, 1 treatment/examination nurse and 1 discharge administrator in service.
Intervention/comparator Four scenarios with different numbers of staff and with or without digital symptom assessment.
Outcome Average overall patient waiting time and average queue length is measured to explore the optimality of patient flow.
Results Compared to the base case, a decrease of 4.63 patients in the triage nurse queue length was observed when using a symptom assessment app. This was accompanied with increasing the doctors queue of 1.85 patients. Average overall patient waiting time was 6.61 minutes less than in the base case and the patients waiting time for triage was reduced from 34.06 to 15.54 minutes, a reduction of 54%.
Conclusions Compared to the base case of the UCC, the use of app based intelligent digital symptom taking has the potential to decrease the average patient waiting to a similar degree to the addition of a triage nurse, and also, fewer people wait for examination by the doctors and the patient average overall patient waiting time is reduced. Most importantly, there is the potential to have a 54% reduction in waiting time to see the triage nurse and reducing this time is known to reduce patient anxiety, staff anxiety and to improve patient care. These simulation results have been used for clinical trial hypotheses forming and have the potential, through this, to impact service provision and approaches to digitalisation.
Article Summary
Strengths and limitations of this study
Strengths and limitations of this study This study addresses an important challenge: how digitalisation and AI-powered technology can help increase health care delivery efficiency and potentially ease overcrowding problems through the application of a discrete event simulation approach.
The nature of UCCs varies from facility to facility and from country to country, with some facilities having some planned appointments, and many having only walk-in appointments.
In our model, we only consider the UCC setting without any planned appointments and we considered a first-in-first-out flow of the patients.
All modelling approaches require some degree of estimation of reasonable clinical parameters. Our model none-the-less describes a scenario relevant to many UCCs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Ada Health GmbH.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
"Not applicable as this is a simulation study that does not involve real patients or patient data"
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All the data in this study, are shown in tables and figures. The simulation data will be delivered if asked.