The Role of Vitamin D in The Age of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Along with an Ecological Approach ===================================================================================================================== * Roya Ghasemian * Amir Shamshirian * Keyvan Heydari * Mohammad Malekan * Reza Alizadeh-Navaei * Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh * Hamed Jafarpour * Arash Rezaei Shahmirzadi * Mehrdad Khodabandeh * Benyamin Seyfari * Alireza Motamedzadeh * Ehsan Dadgostar * Marzieh Aalinezhad * Meghdad Sedaghat * Morteza Behnamfar * Anahita Asadi * Bahman Zarandi * Nazanin Razzaghi * Vahid Yaghoubi Naei * Amirhossein Hessami * Soheil Azizi * Ali Reza Mohseni * Danial Shamshirian ## Abstract **Background** Following emerge of a novel coronavirus from Wuhan, China, in December 2019, it has affected the whole world and after months of efforts by the medical communities, there is still no specific approach for prevention and treatment against the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Evidence recommends that vitamin D might be an important supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against COVID-19. Hence, we carried out a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis along with an ecological investigation in order to maximize the use of everything that exists about the role of vitamin D in the COVID-19. **Methods** A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar (intitle) as well as preprint database of medRxiv, bioRxiv, Research Square, preprints.org, search engine of ScienceDirect and a rapid search through famous journals up to August 4, 2020. Studies focused on the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients were entered into the systematic review. Along with our main aim, to find the second objective “*correlation of global vitamin D status and COVID-19 recovery and mortality*” we carried out a literature search in PubMed database to identify the national or regional studies reported the vitamin D status globally. CMA v. 2.2.064 and SPSS *v*. 16 were used for data analysis. **Results** Eleven studies containing 360,972 participants entered into the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis indicated that 37.7% of COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 26.7%-50.1%) and in 32.2% of patients, levels of vitamin D were insufficient (95% CI, 13.8%-58.4%). Also, a significant increased risk of COVID-19 was found in individuals with low levels of vitamin D (OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.75). In regard to our ecological investigation on 51 countries including 408,748 participants, analyses indicated no correlation between vitamin D levels and recovery rate (*r*= 0.041) as well as mortality rate (*r*=-0.073) globally. However, given latitude, a small reverse correlation between mortality rate and vitamin D status was observed throughout the globe (*r*= -0.177). In Asia, a medium direct correlation was observed for recovery rate (*r*= 0.317) and a significant reveres correlation for mortality rate (*r*= -0.700) with vitamin D status in such patients. In Europe, there were no correlations for both recovery (*r*= 0.040) and mortality rate (*r*= -0.035). In Middle East, the recovery rate (*r*= 0.267) and mortality rate (*r*= -0.217) showed a medium correlation. In North and Sought America, surprisingly, both recovery and mortality rate demonstrated a direct correlation respectively (*r*= 1.000, *r*=0.500). In Oceania, unexpectedly, recovery (*r*= -1.000) and mortality (*r*= -1.000) rates were in considerable reverse correlation with vitamin D levels. **Conclusion** In this systematic review and meta-analysis with an ecological approach, we found a high percentage of COVID-19 patients who suffer from vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency as well as **a significant increased risk of COVID-19 infection in patients with low levels of vitamin D**. Our ecological investigation resulted in substantial direct and reverse correlations between recovery and mortality rates of COVID-19 patients with vitamin D status in different countries. Considering latitudes, a small reverse correlation between vitamin D status and mortality rate was found globally. It seems that populations with lower levels of vitamin D might be more susceptible to the novel coronavirus infection. Nevertheless, due to multiple limitations, if this study does not allow to quantify a “value” of the Vitamin D with full confidence, it allows at least to know what the Vitamin D might be and that it would be prudent to invest in this direction through comprehensive large randomized clinical trials. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f11/67f111e144208b2e52008bd311836a515faf5e1d" alt="Figure1" [Figure1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F1) Keywords * Pandemic * 2019-nCoV * Coronavirus Outbreaks * SARS-CoV-2 * Vitamin D * 25-hydroxyvitamin D * 25(OH)D. ## Introduction Following emerge of a novel coronavirus from Wuhan, China, in December 2019, the respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has affected the whole world and declared as a pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) on March 26, 2020(1). According to Worldometer metrics, this novel virus has been responsible for approximately 18,447,759 infections, of which 11,680,369 cases are recovered and 697,245 cases were died worldwide up to August 4, 2020. After months of efforts by the medical communities, there is still no specific approach for prevention and treatment against the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Also, competition of pandemic with infodemic has led to many controversies and challenges globally. In this regard, one of the hottest topics these days is the role of *Vitamin D* in prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Several functions such as modulating adaptive immune system and cell-mediated immunity, as well as increase of antioxidative-related genes expression have been proven for Vitamin D as an adjuvant in the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory infections (2, 3). According to available investigations, it seems that such functions lead to cytokine storm suppression and avoid Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), which has been studied on other pandemics and infectious diseases in recent years (4-6). To best of our knowledge, unfortunately, after several months there is no adequate high-quality data on different treatments regimen, which raises questions about gaps in scientific works. In this occasion, when there is an essential need for controlled randomized trials, it is surprising to see only observational studies without a control group or non-randomized controlled studies with retrospective nature covering a small number of patients. The same issue is debatable for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D); hence, concerning all of the limitations and analyze difficulties, we carried out a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis with great caution and sensitivity in order to try for maximizing the use of everything that exists about the role of this vitamin in the COVID-19. Additionally, along with this systematic review, we also performed an ecological evaluation to find any relations between global status of vitamin D and COVID-19 recovery/mortality rates. To be honest, we know that working on observational studies give an overestimation of the required value. Therefore, whatever the result with the vitamin D we can present that the result, by our approaches, is also an overestimation of reality; which is very fascinating in itself to get in the current situation, especially through what we found in our ecological approach. ## Methods ### Search Strategy The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was considered for study plan. A systematic search through databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar (intitle) as well as preprint database of medRxiv, bioRxiv, Research Square, preprints.org, search engine of ScienceDirect and a rapid search through famous journals was done up to August 4, 2020. Moreover, to obtain more data we considered gray literatures and references of eligible papers. The search strategy included all MeSH terms and free keywords found for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, and Vitamin D. There was no time/location/ language limitation in this search. ### Criteria study selection Four researchers have screened and selected the papers independently and the supervisor solved the disagreements. Studies met the following criteria included into meta-analysis: 1) comparative or non-comparative studies with retrospective or prospective nature; and 2) studies reported the role of vitamin D in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Studies were excluded if they were: 1) *in vitro* studies, experimental studies, reviews; 2) duplicate publications. ### Data extraction & quality assessment Two researchers (H.J and M.M) have evaluated quality assessment of the papers and extracted data from selected papers. The supervisor (D.Sh) resolved any disagreements in this step. Data extraction checklist included the name of the first author, publication year, region of study, number of patients, comorbidity, vitamin D Status, serum 25-hydrovitamin D levels, ethnicity, mean age, medication dosage, treatment duration, adverse effects, radiological results, and mortality. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist for cross-sectional studies was used to value the studies, concerning various aspects of the methodology and study process. ### Hypothetical strategy According to risk factors such as older age, male, obesity, underlying chronic disorders, higher latitudes, darker skin pigmentation etc., which are common between Vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 toward the severity of the condition, despite the various possible explanations, we hypothesize that vitamin D plays a role in severity of responses to COVID-19 and vitamin D deficiency can be in correlation with COVID-19 mortality rate and recovery rate. In this regard, alongside with our main objective, to find the second aim as an ecological investigation we carried out a literature search in PubMed database for identifying the national or regional studies reported the vitamin D status throughout the world. Data of infection, mortality and recovery of COVID-19 cases were gathered from the *Worldometer* metrics. The meta-analysis was done between all of the published studies in each region for pooling vitamin D mean levels. In this case, according to an international conference on “*Controversies in Vitamin* D” (7), vitamin D cut-off points were considered as follows: * *Vitamin D sufficiency: 25(OH)D concentration greater than 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L)* * *Vitamin D insufficiency: 25(OH)D concentration of 12 to 20 ng/mL (30 to 50 nmol/L)* * *Vitamin D deficiency: 25(OH)D level less than 12 ng/mL (30 nmol/L)* * *A “risk” of vitamin D toxicity: 25(OH)D level >100 ng/mL (>250 nmol/mL)* ### Targeted outcomes 1) Frequency of Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in COVID-19 patients; 2) Mortality rates; 3) Recovery rates; 4) Correlation of mortality and recovery rate in COVID-19 patients with vitamin D status; 5) Latitude dependence of the mortality and recovery rate. ### Heterogeneity assessment I-square (*I2*) statistic was used for heterogeneity evaluation. Following Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (8), the *I2* was interpreted as follows: “*0% to 40%: might not be important; 30% to 60%: may represent moderate heterogeneity; 50% to 90%: may represent substantial heterogeneity; 75% to 100%: considerable heterogeneity. The importance of the observed value of I2 depends on (i) magnitude and direction of effects and (ii) strength of evidence for heterogeneity (e.g. P-value from the chi-squared test, or a confidence interval for I2). “* Thus, random-effects model was used for pooling the outcomes in case of heterogeneity; otherwise, the inverse variance fixed-effect model was used. Forest plots were presented to visualize the degree of variation between studies. ### Data analysis Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) *v*. 2.2.064 software. Pooling of effect sizes was done with 95% Confident Interval (CI). Fixed/random-effects model was used according to heterogeneities. In case of zero frequency, the correction value of 0.1 was used. Correlation of mortality and recovery rates in COVID-19 patients with vitamin D status was evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r). According to Cohen’s classification of effect width (9), value of *r*=0.1 was considered as small effect, *r*=0.25 as medium effect and *r*=0.4 as large effect. The P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS software *v*. 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). ### Publication bias & sensitivity analysis Begg’s and Egger’s tests as well as funnel plot was used for publication bias evaluation. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. ## Results ### Study selection process The first search through databases resulted in 717 papers. After removing duplicated papers and first step screening based on title and abstract, 62 papers were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 11 papers entered into the meta-analysis. PRISMA flow diagram for the study selection process presented in Figure 1. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1b4/7a1b47d2dee6cf6801ab6b834993bb8f650f619d" alt="Figure 1." [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F2) Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for the study selection process ### Study characteristics Among the six studies included in meta-analysis, all of them were designed in retrospective nature. The studies’ sample size ranged from 10 to 348,648 including 360,972 participants. Characteristics of studies entered into the systematic review presented in Table 1. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/T1) Table 1. Characteristics of studies entered into the systematic review ### Quality assessment Results of quality assessment for studies entered into meta-analysis based on modified version of NOS tool for cross-sectional studies were fair. ### Publication bias Results of Begg’s and Egger’s tests in effect size meta-analysis showed no significant publication bias (*Pb*=0.92; *Pe*=0.23). The funnel plot for publication bias of studies presented in Fig. 2. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/977a0/977a00c0523bed926650acd23511e422fc68d6f2" alt="Figure 2." [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F3) Figure 2. Funnel plot for publication bias of studies ### Meta-analysis findings The meta-analysis of event rates showed that 37.7% of COVID-19 patients were suffering from vitamin D deficiency (95% CI, 26.7%-50.1%) and in 32.2% of patients, levels of vitamin D were lower than the normal range (95% CI, 13.8%-58.4%) (Fig. 3). data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58bbd/58bbd9843bafc45d38aae786ba6f5db8e8710272" alt="Figure 3." [Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F4) Figure 3. Forest plot for pooling events of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D insufficiency ### Association between Vitamin D insufficiency and COVID-19 The meta-analysis indicated a substantial higher risk of COVID-19 infection in individuals with vitamin D deficiency between two studies with 1231 cases (OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.75) (Fig. 4). data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2149/a2149ad22f7e996a3db5dfc8edfd5abd4706728e" alt="Figure 4." [Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F5) Figure 4. Association between Vitamin D insufficiency and COVID-19 ### Ecological hypothetical strategy In this part of study, available data from 51 countries on vitamin D status including 408,748 participants were collected from 75 papers (21-95). Meta-analysis findings indicated 50.544 ng/mL mean levels of vitamin D globally (95% CI: 47.068-54.021). Details on continents and countries are presented in Table 2. Also, forest plots of pooling Serum 25-Hydrovitamin D concentration as well as recovery/mortality rates are presented in Supplementary File 1. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/T2) Table 2. Worldwide vitamin D status, COVID-19 infection, mortality and recovery rates ### Vitamin D status Vs. Mortality and Recovery rate (Table 2) The world vitamin D distribution map and its relations with recovery rate as well as mortality are presented in Figure 4. Considering mean levels of vitamin D, SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as COVID-19 mortality and recovery data throughout the world, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient analyses indicated no correlation between vitamin D levels and recovery rate (*r*= 0.041) as well as mortality rate (*r*=-0.073) globally. In detail, in Asia with overall mean levels of 57.326 25(OH)D (95% CI, 56.959-57.693) a substantial direct correlation was observed between vitamin D status and recovery rate (*r*= 0.317) as well as a significant reverse correlation for the mortality rate (*r*= -0.700). In Europe, there were no correlations for both recovery (*r*= 0.040) and mortality rate (*r*= -0.035). In Middle East, although there was a direct correlation between recovery rate and vitamin D status (*r*= 0.267); also, mortality rate was mediumly in reverse correlation with vitamin D status (*r*= -0.217). In North America, surprisingly, both recovery (*r*= 1.000) and mortality rates (*r*= 1.000) were highly correlated to the vitamin D levels. In Sought America, both recovery rate (*r*=0.500) and mortality rate (*r*=0.500) were in a significant direct correlation with 25(OH)D levels. In Oceania, unexpectedly, recovery (*r*= -1.000) and mortality (*r*= -1.000) rates were in substantial reverse correlation with 25(OH)D levels. Considering latitude factor as an adjustment for countries in latitudes higher than ±50°, partial correlation analysis showed a small reverse correlation between mortality rate and vitamin D status throughout the globe (*r*= -0.177), but no correlation was observed for recovery rate (*r*= -0.072). This analysis showed a direct correlation in case of mortality rate in Europe *r*= 0.164. ## Discussion Although comparing global statistics of COVID-19 outcomes is difficult, it is clear that the mortality rate is higher in several countries. It seems that various factors such as age, healthcare system quality, general health status, socioeconomic status, etc. Nonetheless, one of the underestimated factors, which might be associated with COVID-19 outcome is the vitamin D status in every populations. Investigations on respiratory infections indicated that 25-hydroxyvitamin D can effectively induce the host defense peptides against bacterial or viral agents and vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency can lead to non-communicable as well as infectious diseases (2, 96, 97). The other potential role of vitamin D is reduction of inflammatory induced following SARS-CoV-2 infection. In fact, vitamin D affects the renin–angiotensin system pathway and promotes the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which downregulates by SARS-CoV-2 (98). Concerning all of the limitations and no adequate high-quality data about relation of vitamin D status and COVID-19 after several months, we have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis in order to maximize the use of every available data, which would give us an overview toward further studies like what we have done recently on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients (99), which have underestimated first, but the value was revealed after a while. We also hypothesize that vitamin D deficiency can be in correlation with COVID-19 mortality rates and recovery rate, which has studied through an ecological strategy. Unfortunately, there were no clinical trials and high-quality data regarding the role of vitamin D in COVID-19. According to available data entered into our meta-analysis, we could find that approximately more than one-third of the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 were suffering from vitamin D deficiency and this vitamin was insufficient in about 32% of them. In addition, meta-analysis of odds ratios showed a significant increased risk of COVID-19 infection in patients with low levels of plasma vitamin D. These findings are in the same line with other studies, which have debated the association of vitamin D and COVID-19 (100-104). In case of vitamin D supplement’s benefits against acute respiratory tract infections, Martineau *et al*. conducted a met-analysis of randomized controlled on 10.933 participants and resulted in inverse association between vitamin D levels and risk of acute respiratory tract infections. Thus, it can be concluded that patients with lower levels of vitamin D or patients with vitamin D deficiency are at higher risk of developing the disease to the severe form (105). Despite the great importance of the issue there is still no results from underway randomized clinical trials (RCTs). To identify the ongoing RCTs, searching clinical trials registry databases resulted in 22 registered trials on the subject of prevention and treatment role of vitamin D in COVID-19 patients. Hence, following the results of these trials will help the medical associations to reach a general agreement regarding the utilization of vitamin D as a preventive and/or treatment option for COVID-19 patients. Ongoing RCTs can be tracked through following registry codes: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200401046909N2, IRCT20200401046909N1, IRCT20200411047024N1, IRCT20200319046819N1, IRCT20140305016852N4); Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000029732, ChiCTR2000031163), EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT Number (2020-002274-28, 2020-001363-85, 2020-001602-34, 2020-001717-20); ClinicalTrials.gov ([NCT04386044](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04386044&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04370808](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04370808&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04385940](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04385940&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04334005](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04334005&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04363840](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04363840&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04351490](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04351490&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04344041](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04344041&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04335084](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04335084&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04394390](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access\_num=NCT04394390&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04395768](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link\_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04395768&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom), [NCT04386850](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04386850&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom)). In case of relation between vitamin D levels and mortality/recovery rate of COVID-19 patients, some researchers were reported the dependence of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality to the latitude (106, 107); similarly, our hypothetical strategy and big data analysis resulted several direct and reverse correlations in this regard. A quick look at the Fig. 5 shows that there is no regular relation for mortality or recovery rate by increasing vitamin D levels, but significant fluctuations observe regarding each country. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02a94/02a947c33c406672e25bb04501eb949632d74f4c" alt="Figure 5." [Figure 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F6) Figure 5. Global distribution of vitamin D levels and its association with mortality rate and recovery rate related to COVID-19 patients data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed23f/ed23f6d953a013d8e5af57c7fa0d9244d27e2f52" alt="Figure 6." [Figure 6.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/07/2020.06.05.20123554/F7) Figure 6. Comparison of national mortality and recovery changes by increasing of vitamin D levels in different populations Despite the fluctuation, considering latitudes, showed a small reverse correlation between vitamin D status and mortality rate worldwide, which indicates that populations with lower levels of vitamin D might be in higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, focusing on continents and countries one by one, indicates interesting findings in this case. For example, vitamin D status in Asia, Middle East, Africa and Oceania is correlated to the mortality reversely, whereas, it is in direct correlation with mortality in both North and Sought America. This might attract the considerations to the racial and ethnic aspects of the subject in different regions and populations (108, 109). In case of recovery rate, while most of the continents indicated a direct correlation with vitamin D status, Africa and Oceania are significantly showed a reverse correlation in this regard. Considering Table 2, in Africa, the highest mean levels of vitamin D is related to Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania. This finding might be due to the numerous challenges such as human resource, health care systems budgetary, poor management, etc. in such regions (110-112), which unavoidably affects the subject significantly. About Oceania, it seems that extremely high rate of recovery in both Australia and New Zealand led to this statistical outcome. Ultimately, to best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive systematic review that carried out a meta-analysis for investigating the role of vitamin D in COVID-19 patients along with a wide ecological consideration. However, after releasing outcomes of underway mentioned RCTs, an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on this subject could be more conclusive and reliable. It is worth noticing that the current meta-analysis includes the following limitations:1) studies entered into the meta-analysis were observational and cross-sectional; thus, comparative analyses were not applicable in first part of study; 2) There are inevitable challenges with reliability of data due to different strategies in testing (e.g. vitamin D measurement, COVID-19 test, etc.), various subpopulations, etc. in both first part and ecological part of study; 3) other immunomodulator factors (e.g. vitamin C, zinc, selenium, etc.), which might be effective in the outcome of COVID-19 patients, have not considered in included studies; and 4) type *II* statistical errors following studies with small sample size. Eventually, to overcome the limitations and bias, results of the study should be confirmed by robustly large multicentral randomized clinical trials. ## Conclusion The conditional evidence recommends that vitamin D might be an important supportive agent for the immune system, mainly in cytokine response regulation against pathogens. In this systematic review and meta-analysis along with an ecological approach, we found a high percentage of COVID-19 patients who suffer from vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency as well as a significant increased risk of COVID-19 infection in patients with low levels of vitamin D. More importantly, our ecological investigation resulted in substantial direct and reverse correlations between recovery and mortality rate of COVID-19 patients with vitamin D status respectively in different countries. Considering latitudes, a small reverse correlation between vitamin D status and mortality rate was found throughout the world. Altogether, it seems that populations with lower levels of vitamin D might be in higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, further large clinical trials following comprehensive meta-analysis should be taken into account in order to achieve more reliable findings. Additionally, due to multiple limitations, if this study does not allow to quantify a “value” of the Vitamin D with full confidence, it allows at least to know what the Vitamin D might be and that it would be prudent to invest in this direction through comprehensive RCTs. ## Data Availability N/A ## Conflict of interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. ## Funding None. ## Acknowledgments We would like to express our appreciation to the Student Research Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences for approving this student research proposal with the code 7904. * Received June 5, 2020. * Revision received August 6, 2020. * Accepted August 7, 2020. * © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Organization WH (2020) Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports: Geneva: WHO. 2. 2.Greiller CL & Martineau AR (2015) Modulation of the immune response to respiratory viruses by vitamin D. Nutrients 7, 4240–4270. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/nu7064240&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26035247&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 3. 3.Zdrenghea MT, Makrinioti H, Bagacean C et al. (2017) Vitamin D modulation of innate immune responses to respiratory viral infections. Reviews in medical virology 27. 4. 4.Aranow C (2011) Vitamin D and the immune system. Journal of investigative medicine: the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research 59, 881–886. 5. 5.Goncalves-Mendes N, Talvas J, Dualé C et al. (2019) Impact of Vitamin D Supplementation on Influenza Vaccine Response and Immune Functions in Deficient Elderly Persons: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Frontiers in immunology 10, 65. 6. 6.Grant WB & Giovannucci E (2009) The possible roles of solar ultraviolet-B radiation and vitamin D in reducing case-fatality rates from the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in the United States. Dermato-endocrinology 1, 215–219. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4161/derm.1.4.9063&link_type=DOI) 7. 7.Giustina A, Adler RA, Binkley N et al. (2019) Controversies in Vitamin D: Summary Statement From an International Conference. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 104, 234–240. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1210/jc.2018-01414&link_type=DOI) 8. 8.Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J et al. (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.0, 2nd Edition ed: John Wiley & Sons. 9. 9.Karadağ E (2015) Leadership and organizational outcomes: Meta-analysis of empirical studies: Springer. 10. 10.Raharusuna P, Priambada S, Budiarti C et al. (2020) Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality and Vitamin D: An Indonesian Study. 11. 11.De Smet D, De Smet K, Herroelen P et al. (2020) Vitamin D deficiency as risk factor for severe COVID-19: a convergence of two pandemics. medRxiv, 2020.2005.2001.20079376. 12. 12.Lau FH, Majumder R, Torabi R et al. (2020) Vitamin D Insufficiency is Prevalent in Severe COVID-19. *medRxiv*, 2020.2004.2024.20075838. 13. 13.Cuãat T, Ojeda A Calvo A (2020) Vitamin D Supplementation Could Possibly Improve Clinical Outcomes of Patients Infected with Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Research Square. 14. 14.Pinzon RT, Angela A Pradana AW (2020) Vitamin D Defciency Among Patients with COVID-19: Case Series and Recent Literature Review. Research Square. 15. 15.Meltzer DO, Best TJ, Zhang H et al. (2020) Association of Vitamin D Deficiency and Treatment with COVID-19 Incidence. *medRxiv*, 2020.2005.2008.20095893. 16. 16.Hastie CE, Mackay DF, Ho F et al. (2020) Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank. Diabetes & metabolic syndrome 14, 561–565. 17. 17.Alipio M (2020) Vitamin D Supplementation Could Possibly Improve Clinical Outcomes of Patients Infected with Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Available at SSRN 3571484. 18. 18.Merzon E, Tworowski D, Gorohovski A et al. (2020) Low plasma 25(OH) vitamin D level is associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection: an Israeli population-based study. The FEBS Journal n/a. 19. 19.Panagiotou G, Tee SA, Ihsan Y et al. (2020) Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 are associated with greater disease severity. Clinical Endocrinology n/a. 20. 20.Carpagnano GE, Di Lecce V, Quaranta VN et al. (2020) Vitamin D deficiency as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Research Square. 21. 21.Krieg M-A, Cornuz J, Jacquet A et al. (1998) Influence of anthropometric parameters and biochemical markers of bone metabolism on quantitative ultrasound of bone in the institutionalized elderly. Osteoporosis international 8, 115–120. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9666933&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000078768900004&link_type=ISI) 22. 22.Bettica P, Bevilacqua M, Vago T et al. (1999) High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among free-living postmenopausal women referred to an osteoporosis outpatient clinic in northern Italy for initial screening. Osteoporosis international 9, 226–229. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s001980050141&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10450411&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000080177200007&link_type=ISI) 23. 23.Theiler, Stähelin. Tyndall et al. (1999) Calcidiol, calcitriol and parathyroid hormone serum concentrations in institutionalized and ambulatory elderly in Switzerland. International journal for vitamin and nutrition research 69, 96–105. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1024/0300-9831.69.2.96&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10218146&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 24. 24.Pehlivan I, Hatun S, Aydogan M et al. (2003) Maternal vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D supplementation in healthy infants. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 45, 315–320. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14768796&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 25. 25.Bolland M, Grey A, Ames R et al. (2006) Determinants of vitamin D status in older men living in a subtropical climate. Osteoporosis international 17, 1742–1748. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00198-006-0190-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16932872&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000241452000005&link_type=ISI) 26. 26.Lappe JM, Davies KM, Travers-Gustafson D et al. (2006) Vitamin D status in a rural postmenopausal female population. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 25, 395402. 27. 27.Omrani G, Masoompour S, Sadegholvaad A et al. (2006) Effect of menopause and renal function on vitamin D status in Iranian women. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 12 (1–2), 188-195, 2006. 28. 28.González G, Alvarado JN, Rojas A et al. (2007) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Chilean healthy postmenopausal women with normal sun exposure: additional evidence for a worldwide concern. Menopause 14, 455–461. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/GME.0b013e31802c54c0&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17290161&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 29. 29.Roddam AW, Neale R, Appleby P et al. (2007) Association between plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and fracture risk: the EPIC-Oxford study. American journal of epidemiology 166, 1327–1336. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwm210&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17716981&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 30. 30.Masoumpour S, Sadegh AA Ranjbar OGH (2008) Effects of age and renal function on vitamin D status in men. 31. 31.Van Schoor N, Visser M, Pluijm S et al. (2008) Vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures. Bone 42, 260–266. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.002&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18289505&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000252914600003&link_type=ISI) 32. 32.Mehta S, Hunter DJ, Mugusi FM et al. (2009) Perinatal outcomes, including mother-to-child transmission of HIV, and child mortality and their association with maternal vitamin D status in Tanzania. The Journal of infectious diseases 200, 1022–1030. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1086/605699&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19673647&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000269475000003&link_type=ISI) 33. 33.Orwoll E, Nielson CM, Marshall LM et al. (2009) Vitamin D deficiency in older men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 94, 1214–1222. 34. 34.Snellman G, Melhus H, Gedeborg R et al. (2009) Seasonal genetic influence on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: a twin study. PloS one 4. 35. 35.Wejse C, Gomes VF, Rabna P et al. (2009) Vitamin D as supplementary treatment for tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 179, 843–850. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1164/rccm.200804-567OC&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19179490&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000265665000014&link_type=ISI) 36. 36.Bermudez OI, Sud S, Montenegro-Bethancourt G et al. (2010) Vitamin D status of elderly Mayan residents of the western highlands of Guatemala: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 37. 37.Chee W, Chong P, Chuah K et al. (2010) Calcium Intake, Vitamin D and Bone Health Status of Post-menopausal Chinese Women in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition 16. 38. 38.Hekimsoy Z, Dinç G, Kafesçiler S et al. (2010) Vitamin D status among adults in the Aegean region of Turkey. BMC Public Health 10, 782. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21176241&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 39. 39.Laktasic-Zerjavic N, Korsic M, Crncevic-Orlic Z et al. (2010) Vitamin D status, dependence on age, and seasonal variations in the concentration of vitamin D in Croatian postmenopausal women initially screened for osteoporosis. Clinical rheumatology 29, 861867. 40. 40.Melhus Hk, Snellman G, Gedeborg R et al. (2010) Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and fracture risk in a community-based cohort of elderly men in Sweden. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 95, 2637–2645. 41. 41.Oren Y, Shapira Y, Agmon-Levin N et al. (2010) Vitamin D insufficiency in a sunny environment: a demographic and seasonal analysis. IMAJ-Israel Medical Association Journal 12, 751. 42. 42.Sud SR, Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Bermúdez OI et al. (2010) Older Mayan residents of the western highlands of Guatemala lack sufficient levels of vitamin D. Nutrition research 30, 739–746. 43. 43.Viljakainen HT, Saarnio E, Hytinantti T et al. (2010) Maternal vitamin D status determines bone variables in the newborn. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 95, 1749–1757. 44. 44.Chan R, Chan CCD, Woo J et al. (2011) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, bone mineral density, and non-vertebral fracture risk in community-dwelling older men: results from Mr. Os, Hong Kong. Archives of osteoporosis 6, 21–30. 45. 45.Choi HS, Oh HJ, Choi H et al. (2011) Vitamin D insufficiency in Korea—a greater threat to younger generation: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2008. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 96, 643–651. 46. 46.Kaykhaei MA, Hashemi M, Narouie B et al. (2011) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Zahedan, southeast Iran. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 58, 37–41. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000323749&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21304235&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 47. 47.Marwaha R, Tandon N, Chopra S et al. (2011) Vitamin D status in pregnant Indian women across trimesters and different seasons and its correlation with neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. British journal of nutrition 106, 1383–1389. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S000711451100170X&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21736816&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 48. 48.Moy FM (2011) Vitamin D status and its associated factors of free living Malay adults in a tropical country, Malaysia. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 104, 444–448. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21636288&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 49. 49.Shea MK, Houston DK, Tooze JA et al. (2011) Correlates and prevalence of insufficient 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in black and white older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59, 1165–1174. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03476.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21668915&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 50. 50.Shivane VK, Sarathi V, Bandgar T et al. (2011) High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in young healthy adults from the western part of India. Postgraduate medicaljournal 87, 514518. 51. 51.Steinvil A, Leshem-Rubinow E, Berliner S et al. (2011) Vitamin D deficiency prevalence and cardiovascular risk in Israel. European journal of clinical investigation 41, 263–268. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02403.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20955219&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 52. 52.Ardawi M-S, Sibiany A, Bakhsh T et al. (2012) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy Saudi Arabian men: relationship to bone mineral density, parathyroid hormone, bone turnover markers, and lifestyle factors. Osteoporosis International 23, 675686. 53. 53.Daly RM, Gagnon C, Lu ZX et al. (2012) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its determinants in Australian adults aged 25 years and older: a national, population-based study. Clinical endocrinology 77, 26–35. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04320.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22168576&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 54. 54.El Maghraoui A, Ouzzif Z, Mounach A et al. (2012) Hypovitaminosis D and prevalent asymptomatic vertebral fractures in Moroccan postmenopausal women. BMC women’s health 12, 11. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1472-6874-12-11&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22531050&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 55. 55.El-Menyar A, Rahil A, Dousa K et al. (2012) Low vitamin D and cardiovascular risk factors in males and females from a sunny, rich country. The open cardiovascular medicine journal 6, 76. 56. 56.Mayer O, Filipovský J, Seidlerova J et al. (2012) The association between low 25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased aortic stiffness. Journal of human hypertension 26, 650655. 57. 57.Rajah J, Haq A Pettifor JM (2012) Vitamin D and calcium status in urban children attending an ambulatory clinic service in the United Arab Emirates. Dermato-endocrinology 4, 39–43. 58. 58.Saliba W, Barnett O, Rennert HS et al. (2012) The risk of all-cause mortality is inversely related to serum 25 (OH) D levels. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 97, 2792–2798. 59. 59.Chao Y-S, Brunel L, Faris P et al. (2013) Vitamin D status of Canadians employed in northern latitudes. Occupational medicine 63, 485–493. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/occmed/kqt106&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24027218&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 60. 60.Friis H, Range N, Changalucha J et al. (2013) Vitamin D status among pulmonary TB patients and non-TB controls: a cross-sectional study from Mwanza, Tanzania. PloS one 8. 61. 61.Gernand AD, Bodnar LM, Klebanoff MA et al. (2013) Maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and placental vascular pathology in a multicenter US cohort. The American journal of clinical nutrition 98, 383–388. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpjbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI5OC8yLzM4MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzA4LzA3LzIwMjAuMDYuMDUuMjAxMjM1NTQuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 62. 62.Hirani V, Cumming R, Blyth F et al. (2013) Vitamin D status among older community dwelling men living in a sunny country and associations with lifestyle factors: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project, Sydney, Australia. The journal of nutrition, health & aging 17, 587–593. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12603-013-0013-z&link_type=DOI) 63. 63.Korchia G, Amitai Y, Moshe G et al. (2013) Vitamin D deficiency in children in Jerusalem: the need for updating the recommendation for supplementation. Isr Med Assoc J 15, 333338. 64. 64.Olama SM, Senna MK, Elarman MM et al. (2013) Serum vitamin D level and bone mineral density in premenopausal Egyptian women with fibromyalgia. Rheumatology international 33, 185–192. 65. 65.Song SJ, Zhou L, Si S et al. (2013) The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its related maternal factors in pregnant women in Beijing. PLoS One 8. 66. 66.Alfawaz H, Tamim H, Alharbi S et al. (2014) Vitamin D status among patients visiting a tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective review of 3475 cases. BMC public health 14, 159. 67. 67.Buchebner D, McGuigan F, Gerdhem P et al. (2014) Vitamin D insufficiency over 5 years is associated with increased fracture risk—An observational cohort study of elderly women. Osteoporosis International 25, 2767–2775. 68. 68.Buyukuslu N, Esin K, Hizli H et al. (2014) Clothing preference affects vitamin D status of young women. Nutrition research 34, 688–693. 69. 69.Gill TK, Hill CL, Shanahan EM et al. (2014) Vitamin D levels in an Australian population. BMC public health 14, 1001. 70. 70.Golbahar J, Al-Saffar N, Diab DA et al. (2014) Predictors of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in adult Bahrainis: a cross-sectional study. Public health nutrition 17, 732738. 71. 71.Karagüzel G, Dilber B, Çan G et al. (2014) Seasonal vitamin D status of healthy schoolchildren and predictors of low vitamin D status. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 58, 654–660. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/MPG.0000000000000274&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24787093&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 72. 72.Kim SH, Oh MK, Namgung R et al. (2014) Prevalence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency in Korean adolescents: association with age, season and parental vitamin D status. Public health nutrition 17, 122–130. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S1368980012004703&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23098327&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 73. 73.Lacroix M, Battista M-C, Doyon M et al. (2014) Lower vitamin D levels at first trimester are associated with higher risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta diabetologica 51, 609–616. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00592-014-0564-4&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24526261&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 74. 74.Li S, Ou Y, Zhang H et al. (2014) Vitamin D status and its relationship with body composition, bone mineral density and fracture risk in urban central south Chinese postmenopausal women. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 64, 13–19. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24642634&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 75. 75.Pludowski P, Grant WB, Bhattoa HP et al. (2014) Vitamin D status in central Europe. International Journal of Endocrinology 2014. 76. 76.Sayed-Hassan R, Abazid N Alourfi Z (2014) Relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, serum calcium, and parathyroid hormone in apparently healthy Syrian people. Archives of osteoporosis 9, 176. 77. 77.Cadario F, Savastio S, Magnani C et al. (2015) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in native versus migrant mothers and newborns in the north of Italy: a call to act with a stronger prevention program. PLoS One 10. 78. 78.Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Skrabáková Z et al. (2015) Standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data from four Nordic population samples using the Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols: Shedding new light on vitamin D status in Nordic individuals. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation 75, 549–561. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/00365513.2015.1057898&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26305421&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 79. 79.Junaid K, Rehman A, Jolliffe DA et al. (2015) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among women of child-bearing age in Lahore Pakistan, associating with lack of sun exposure and illiteracy. BMC women’s health 15, 83. 80. 80.Ke L, Mason R, Mpofu E et al. (2015) Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status in a representative population living in Macau, China. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 148, 261–268. 81. 81.Loy SL, Lek N, Yap F et al. (2015) Association of maternal vitamin D status with glucose tolerance and caesarean section in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort: the growing up in Singapore towards healthy outcomes study. PloS one 10, e0142239. 82. 82.Mehboobali N, Iqbal SP Iqbal MP (2015) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in a low income peri-urban community in Karachi. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 65, 946. 83. 83.Nakamura K, Kitamura K, Takachi R et al. (2015) Impact of demographic, environmental, and lifestyle factors on vitamin D sufficiency in 9084 Japanese adults. Bone 74, 10–17. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bone.2014.12.064&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25576673&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 84. 84.Pratumvinit B, Wongkrajang P, Wataganara T et al. (2015) Maternal vitamin D status and its related factors in pregnant women in Bangkok, Thailand. PloS one 10. 85. 85.Willix C, Rasmussen S, Evans S et al. (2015) A comparison of vitamin D levels in two antenatal populations in regional Western Australia:’Tjindoo Ba Thonee Thurra’: Sunshine for the pregnant belly. Australian family physician 44, 141. 86. 86.Zhen D, Liu L, Guan C et al. (2015) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among middle-aged and elderly individuals in northwestern China: its relationship to osteoporosis and lifestyle factors. Bone 71, 1–6. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.024&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25284157&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 87. 87.Al Shaikh AM, Abaalkhail B, Soliman A et al. (2016) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and calcium homeostasis in Saudi children. Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology 8, 461. 88. 88.Ayadi ID, Nouaili EB, Talbi E et al. (2016) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in mothers and their newborns in a Tunisian population. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 133, 192–195. 89. 89.Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Skrabáková Z et al. (2016) Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? The American journal of clinical nutrition 103, 1033–1044. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpjbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiMTAzLzQvMTAzMyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzA4LzA3LzIwMjAuMDYuMDUuMjAxMjM1NTQuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 90. 90.Fohner AE, Wang Z, Yracheta J et al. (2016) Genetics, diet, and season are associated with serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration in a Yup’ik study population from southwestern Alaska. The Journal of nutrition 146, 318–325. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToibnV0cml0aW9uIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjE0Ni8yLzMxOCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzA4LzA3LzIwMjAuMDYuMDUuMjAxMjM1NTQuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 91. 91.Issa CTMI, Silva AS, Toscano LT et al. (2016) Relationship between cardiometabolic profile, vitamin D status and BsmI polymorphism of the VDR gene in non-institutionalized elderly subjects: Cardiometabolic profile, vitamin D status and BsmI polymorphism of the VDR gene in non-institutionalized elderly subjects. Experimental gerontology 81, 56–64. 92. 92.Smith G, Wimalawansa SJ, Laillou A et al. (2016) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Cambodian women: a common deficiency in a sunny country. Nutrients 8, 290. 93. 93.Souberbielle J-C, Massart C, Brailly-Tabard S et al. (2016) Prevalence and determinants of vitamin D deficiency in healthy French adults: the VARIETE study. Endocrine 53, 543550. 94. 94.Torkaman M, Abolghasemi H, Amirsalari S et al. (2016) Comparison of the vitamin D status of children younger and older than 2 years in Tehran: are supplements really necessary? International journal of endocrinology and metabolism 14. 95. 95.Naseh A, Ashrafzadeh S Rassi S (2018) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in pregnant mothers in Tehran and investigating its association with serum glucose and insulin. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 31, 2312–2318. 96. 96.Hansdottir S, Monick MM, Hinde SL et al. (2008) Respiratory epithelial cells convert inactive vitamin D to its active form: potential effects on host defense. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 181, 7090–7099. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6ODoiamltbXVub2wiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTE6IjE4MS8xMC83MDkwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDgvMDcvMjAyMC4wNi4wNS4yMDEyMzU1NC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 97. 97.Olliver M, Spelmink L, Hiew J et al. (2013) Immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D on innate and adaptive immune responses to Streptococcus pneumoniae. The Journal of infectious diseases 208, 1474–1481. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/infdis/jit355&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23922371&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2020%2F08%2F07%2F2020.06.05.20123554.atom) 98. 98.Mitchell F (2020) Vitamin-D and COVID-19: do deficient risk a poorer outcome? The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 99. 99.Shamshirian A, Hessami A, Heydari K et al. (2020) Hydroxychloroquine Versus COVID-19: A Periodic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2020.2004.2014.20065276. 100.100.Carter SJ, Baranauskas MN Fly AD (2020) Considerations for Obesity, Vitamin D, and Physical Activity Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Obesity 28, 1176–1177. 101.101.Ilie PC, Stefanescu S Smith L (2020) The role of vitamin D in the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 infection and mortality. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 32, 11951198. 102.102.Jakovac H (2020) COVID-19 and vitamin D—Is there a link and an opportunity for intervention? American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 318, E589-E589. 103.103.Molloy E & Murphy (2020) Vitamin D, Covid-19 and Children. Ir Med J 113, 64. 104.104.Zemb P, Bergman P, Camargo CA, Jr.. et al. (2020) Vitamin D deficiency and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of global antimicrobial resistance 22, 133–134. 105.105.Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL et al. (2017) Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 356, i6583. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjE3OiIzNTYvZmViMTVfNC9pNjU4MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIwLzA4LzA3LzIwMjAuMDYuMDUuMjAxMjM1NTQuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 106.106.Braiman M (2020) Latitude Dependence of the COVID-19 Mortality Rate—A Possible Relationship to Vitamin D Deficiency? Available at SSRN 3561958. 107.107.Laird E, Rhodes J Kenny R (2020) Vitamin D and Inflammation: Potential Implications for Severity of Covid-19. Irish Medical Journal. 108.108.Chawla D, Daniels JL, Benjamin-Neelon SE et al. (2019) Racial and ethnic differences in predictors of vitamin D among pregnant women in south-eastern USA. Journal of nutritional science 8, e8. 109.109.Correia A, Azevedo Mdo S, Gondim F et al. (2014) Ethnic aspects of vitamin D deficiency. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia 58, 540–544. 110.110.Moszynski P (2006) WHO report highlights Africa’s health challenges. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 333, 1088. [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMzMvNzU3OC8xMDg4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDgvMDcvMjAyMC4wNi4wNS4yMDEyMzU1NC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 111.111.Oleribe OO, Momoh J, Uzochukwu BS et al. (2019) Identifying Key Challenges Facing Healthcare Systems In Africa And Potential Solutions. International journal of general medicine 12, 395–403. 112.112.Organization WH (2014) The African regional health report 2014: The health of the people.