Abstract
Objectives To investigate COVID-19 risk by occupational group.
Design Prospective study of linked population-based and administrative data.
Setting UK Biobank data linked to SARS-CoV-2 test results from Public Health England from 16 March to 3 May 2020.
Participants 120,621 UK Biobank participants who were employed or self-employed at baseline (2006-2010) and were 65 years or younger in March 2020. Overall, 29% (n=37,890) were employed in essential occupational groups, which included healthcare workers, social and education workers, and ‘other’ essential workers comprising of police and protective service, food, and transport workers. Poisson regression models, adjusted for baseline sociodemographic, work-related, health, and lifestyle-related risk factors were used to assess risk ratios (RRs) of testing positive in hospital by occupational group as reported at baseline relative to non-essential workers.
Main outcome measures Positive SARS-CoV-2 test within a hospital setting (i.e. as an inpatient or in an Emergency Department).
Results 817 participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 and of these, 206 (0.2%) individuals had a positive test in a hospital setting. Relative to non-essential workers, healthcare workers (RR 7.59, 95% CI: 5.43 to 10.62) and social and education workers (RR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.46) had a higher risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 in hospital. Using more detailed groupings, medical support staff (RR 8.57, 95% CI: 4.35 to 16.87) and social care workers (RR 2.99, 95% CI: 1.71 to 5.24) had highest risk within the healthcare worker and social and education worker categories, respectively. In general, adjustment for covariates did not substantially change the pattern of occupational differences in risk.
Conclusions Essential workers in health and social care have a higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. These findings underscore the need for national and organizational policies and practices that protect and support workers with elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
What is already known on this topic
Essential workers have a higher exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus due to the nature of their work.
In comparison to non-essential workers, healthcare workers have a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
What this study adds
In addition to healthcare workers who have a more than seven-fold higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, those in social care have a three-fold increased risk.
Adjustment for potential confounding and mediating variables did not account for the differences in the observed risk between occupational groups.
Competing Interest Statement
Jill Pell is a member of the UK Biobank Scientific Steering Committee.
Funding Statement
We also acknowledge financial support from the Medical Research Council and Chief Scientist Office (MC_UU_12017/13; SPHSU13). CLN is supported by a Medical Research Council Fellowship (MR/R024774/1) and SVK by a NRS Senior Clinical Fellowship (SCAF/15). The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the above funding bodies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank study received ethical approval from the NHS National Research Ethics Service North West (16/NW/0274) and all participants provided written informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos