Meteorological Conditions and Covid-19 in Large U.S. Cities =========================================================== * Hisato Takagi * Toshiki Kuno * Yujiro Yokoyama * Hiroki Ueyama * Takuya Matsushiro * Yosuke Hari * Tomo Ando ## Abstract To determine whether prevalence of Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is modulated by meteorological conditions, we herein conducted meta-regression of data in large U.S. cities. We selected 33 large U.S. cities with a population of >500,000. The integrated numbers of confirmed Covid-19 cases in the country to which the city belongs on 14 May 2020, the estimated population in 2019 in the country, and monthly meteorological conditions at the city for 4 months (from January to April 2020) were obtained. Meteorological conditions consisted of mean temperature (F), total precipitation (inch), mean wind speed (MPH), mean sky cover, and mean relative humidity (%). Monthly data for 4 months were averaged or integrated. The Covid-19 prevalence was defined as the integrated number of Covid-19 cases divided by the population. Random-effects meta-regression was performed by means of OpenMetaAnalyst. In a meta-regression graph, Covid-19 prevalence (plotted as the logarithm transformed prevalence on the y-axis) was depicted as a function of a given factor (plotted as a meteorological datum on the x-axis). A slope of the meta-regression line was significantly negative (coefficient, −0.069; P < 0.001) for the mean temperature and significantly positive for the mean wind speed (coefficient, 0.174; P = 0.027) and the sky cover (coefficient, 2.220; P = 0.023). In conclusion, lower temperature and higher wind speed/sky cover may be associated with higher Covid-19 prevalence, which should be confirmed by further epidemiological researches adjusting for various risk and protective factors (in addition to meteorological conditions) of Covid-19. ## Introduction Higher temperature and ultraviolet (UV) index in Northern Europe have been reported as the most important meteorological protective factors for the transmission of influenza virus.1 On the other hand, a recent study in China suggests that higher temperature and UV radiation may not be associated with a decrease in the epidemics of Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19).2 To determine whether prevalence of COVID-19 is modulated by meteorological conditions, we herein conducted meta-regression of data in large U.S. cities. ## Methods We selected 33 large U.S. cities with a population of >500,000 in 2010 from the U.S. Census Bureau ([http://www.census.gov](http://www.census.gov)). The integrated numbers of confirmed Covid-19 cases in the country to which the city belongs on 14 May 2020 from the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center ([https://coronavirus.jhu.edu](https://coronavirus.jhu.edu)), the estimated population in 2019 in the country from the U.S. Census Bureau, and monthly meteorological conditions at the city for 4 months (from January to April 2020) from the National Weather Service ([https://www.weather.gov](https://www.weather.gov)) were obtained (Table 1). Meteorological conditions consisted of mean temperature (F), total precipitation (inch), mean wind speed (MPH), mean sky cover, and mean relative humidity (%). Monthly data for 4 months were averaged or integrated. The Covid-19 prevalence was defined as the integrated number of Covid-19 cases divided by the population. Random-effects meta-regression was performed by means of OpenMetaAnalyst ([http://www.cebm.brown.edu/openmeta/index.html](http://www.cebm.brown.edu/openmeta/index.html)). In a meta-regression graph, Covid-19 prevalence (plotted as the logarithm transformed prevalence on the y-axis) was depicted as a function of a given factor (plotted as the meteorological data on the x-axis). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/22/2020.05.17.20104547/T1) Table 1. Extracted data in each large U.S. city and country to which the city belongs. ## Results Results of the meta-regression were summarized in **Table 2**. A slope of the metaregression line was significantly negative (coefficient, –0.069; P < 0.001; **Figure 1**, upper panel) for the mean temperature (indicating that Covid-19 prevalence decreased significantly as the mean temperature increased) and significantly positive for the mean wind speed (coefficient, 0.174; P = 0.027; **Figure 1**, middle panel) and the sky cover (coefficient, 2.220; P = 0.023; **Figure 1**, lower panel) (indicating that Covid-19 prevalence increased significantly as the mean wind speed and the sky cover increased). View this table: [Supplementary Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/22/2020.05.17.20104547/T2) Supplementary Table 2. Meta-regression summary ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/05/22/2020.05.17.20104547/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/22/2020.05.17.20104547/F1) Figure 1. Meta-regression graph depicting covid-19 prevalence (plotted as the logarithm transformed prevalence on the y-axis) as a function of the given factors (plotted as the meteorological data on the x-axis). ## Discussion and Conclusion The present meta-regression suggests that temperature may be negatively and wind speed/sky cover may be positively associated with COVID-19 prevalence. Higher sky cover is probably related to lower UV radiation. Our recent preliminary study of Japanese prefectural data suggests that temperature and UV index may be negatively associated with COVID-19 prevalence,3 which could strengthen the present findings. Despite the association of lower temperature and UV index with the influenza transmission,1 no association of temperature and UV radiation with the COVID-19 epidemics has been reported,2 however, which may be denied by the present results of the association of lower temperature and higher sky cover with higher COVID-19 prevalence. In conclusion, lower temperature and higher wind speed/sky cover may be associated with higher Covid-19 prevalence, which should be confirmed by further epidemiological researches adjusting for various risk and protective factors (in addition to meteorological conditions) of Covid-19. ## Data Availability The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. * Received May 17, 2020. * Revision received May 17, 2020. * Accepted May 22, 2020. * © 2020, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission. ## References 1. 1.Ianevski A, Zusinaite E, Shtaida N, et al. Low Temperature and Low UV Indexes Correlated with Peaks of Influenza Virus Activity in Northern Europe during 2010–2018. Viruses 2019; 11: 207. 2. 2.Yao Y, Pan J, Liu Z, et al. No association of COVID-19 transmission with temperature or UV radiation in Chinese cities. Eur Respir J 2020;55:2000517. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiZXJqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiI1NS81LzIwMDA1MTciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMC8wNS8yMi8yMDIwLjA1LjE3LjIwMTA0NTQ3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 3. 3.Takagi H, Kuno T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Higher Air Temperature, Pressure, and Ultraviolet Are Associated with Less Covid-19 Incidence. medRxiv 2002 May 13. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.09.20096321. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoibWVkcnhpdiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoyMToiMjAyMC4wNS4wOS4yMDA5NjMyMXYyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjAvMDUvMjIvMjAyMC4wNS4xNy4yMDEwNDU0Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)