On the Front (Phone) Lines: Results of a COVID-19 Hotline in Northeast Ohio

Introduction

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a novel pathogen (SARS-CoV-2) first detected in Wuhan, China in December 2019.[1] This pathogen has since spread worldwide with >3 million infected and >900,000 cases and >50,000 deaths in the United States[2] before the end of April 2020. Although only a minority of patients with COVID-19 develop severe disease [3], researchers and clinicians have struggled to adapt to the cascade of disruptions to health care practice and to employ systems that effectively manage the demand for services. Local, national and international policymakers and health system leaders around the globe are urgently in need of evidence to guide decision making on effective clinical care strategies as a component of pandemic response.

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, nurse triage lines reduced in-person visits for influenza-like symptoms, were cost effective, had a high degree of satisfaction among callers, and were able to reach rural and uninsured populations.[4,5,6,7] Reaching vulnerable populations and those of lower socioeconomic status (SES) during a pandemic is of particular importance as individuals of lower SES have greater barriers to information access and are more likely to adopt incorrect protective behaviors.[8]

To further promote telehealth in the COVID-19 era, throughout March and April of 2020 federal and state policies have been altered to remove or ease geographic restrictions and other regulatory barriers to telehealth visits.[10] Telehealth is well-suited for use during pandemics as clinicians can provide care and consultation to isolated populations and counter the surge in demand for medical care while using telehealth as a form of electronic personal protective equipment.[9, 11, 12, 13] Telehealth in the COVID19 era is, thus, theorized as a useful strategy in “forward triage,” the sorting of patients prior to their arrival in the emergency department[13,14] and as a means to provide patient guidance and reassurance[11].

On Monday, March 9^th, the first 3 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were diagnosed in Northeast Ohio.[15] On March 13^th, our health care system launched a RN triage-linked, 24-hour availability, physician-staffed hotline to assess, advise and treat individuals who called with symptoms that could be COVID-19 related. Over the next five weeks, the RN triage line received more than 12,000 calls resulting in more than 5,000 physician telehealth visits. While other institutions have reported on the establishment of triage system protocols within their electronic health records (EHRs) and have updated patient portals to provide patients with self-triage and self-scheduling abilities[15-17], to our knowledge this is the first study to examine use of a COVID-19 hotline that provides patients with direct physician care.

Methods

Intervention

All individuals in Northeast Ohio with questions or concerns about COVID-19 were invited to call a dedicated hotline if they had questions or concerns about COVID-19 (Figure 1). Callers are prompted to press 1 to hear information about COVID-19 or press 2 to speak with a nurse about questions or signs and symptoms of COVID-19. Using standard protocols based on the caller’s symptoms, the nurse determined if further evaluation for COVID-19 was warranted and, if so, scheduled the patient for a same-day telehealth visit with a physician. A total of 91 physicians from family medicine, medicine-pediatrics, general internal medicine, pediatrics, and otolaryngology have staffed the hotline. Physicians evaluate the patient’s condition over the phone and recommend a treatment plan. Patients who completed a physician telehealth visit received a follow-up call from a care coordinator within 24 hours to assess for any change in symptoms. During the follow-up call, the care coordinator also assessed the patient for limitations in basic living needs and offered to connect them with services provided by the MetroHealth Institute for H.O.P.E. (Health, Opportunities, Partnerships, Empowerment), including home delivery of food and prescriptions, behavioral health visits, and spiritual care.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

FIGURE 1:

COVID-19 Hotline Patient Flow

Results

The complete study flow and most common visit dispositions are represented in Figure 1. Between March 13 and April 20, 2020, there were a total of 12,512 calls to the RN triage line from 10,112 unique individuals. A total of 5,027 RN triage calls from 4,213 patients were referred for a telehealth physician visit. An additional 96 physician telehealth visits had no preceding RN triage call. Demographic characteristics of the nurse triage-only and the physician COVID-19 line patients are presented in Table 1. Daily call volume was steady throughout the five-week study period and the cumulative increase continued almost parallel to growth in confirmed COVID-19 cases for Cuyahoga County (Figure 2). For all calls, common reasons for the call were cough (22.3%), advice/health education (15.6%), difficulty breathing (6.1%), fever (4.7%), and flu-like illness (4.0%). Similarly, the most common RN protocols used were for cough (11.0%), chest pain (4.8), sore throat (4.0%), abdominal pain (3.4%), and fever (3.3%). Among all calls to the RN triage line, 38% were referred for a same-day physician telehealth visit. 10% were advised to go immediately to the emergency room, and 52% were not COVID19-related or required no additional care. Of the hotline callers, 482 (5%) had one or more COVID tests reported with 69 (14%) testing positive. A total of 287 (7%) telehealth patients had a subsequent ED visit, and 44 (1%) were hospitalized with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Among those patients advised to stay at home at their first physician hotline visit, 83% recorded no further face-to-face clinical encounters.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

FIGURE 2:

COVID-19 Cases (Hotline and Cuyahoga County) and Hospitalizations (County)

For the patients with a physician phone visit, common visit diagnoses included respiratory symptoms (43.0%), URI unspecified type (5.7%), cough (5.5%), viral URI with cough (3.6%), and sore throat (2.1%). Less than 2% of scheduled phone calls were “no show.” Among all physician telephone visits, 79% were advised to stay at home, self-isolate, and continue monitoring symptoms. In 14% of visits, physicians felt the patient was unlikely to have a COVID-related problem. 5% were advised to go to the emergency department or seek additional non-emergency care or testing.

Of the 4,213 patients with a physician phone visit, 3,713 (88%) received one or more care-coordinator follow-up calls. At follow-up, 92% of patients reported their symptoms had not worsened and 67% reported having connected with the follow-up recommended on the initial physician phone visit. Some patients (16%) reported feeling overwhelmed, anxious, or isolated due to COVID-19, and 3% reported needing help to manage their basic needs. Those requiring help with basic needs were offered services from the MetroHealth Institute for H.O.P.E., which has provided these patients with multiple services including food deliveries, prescription deliveries, social work support, behavioral health telephone visits, and faith-based comfort calls from pastoral care personnel.

Findings from multivariable logistic regression models including patient demographics, smoking status and physician telephone disposition are presented in Table 2. Emergency department visits and hospitalizations were positively associated with a telehealth visit disposition indicating that the patient was high risk and should seek emergency care. Receipt of COVID-19 testing was associated with older age, current smoking status, employee health insurance, and a telephone visit disposition of high risk or self-isolation. Finally, among those who received testing, a positive test result was associated with older age.

Discussion

In this report, we demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of a large-scale physician-staffed hotline in providing care and disseminating information to the general public of a large metropolitan area amidst a global pandemic. Strengths of our study include a large sample consisting of many individuals who were not tested despite concerns about having COVID-19, care process data from standardized protocols, and outcome data collected from the electronic health records from multiple care systems.

Recent reports have focused on use of a self-administered survey as a mechanism for conserving PPE, citing the difficulty of rapidly creating robust telehealth infrastructure.[21] In contrast, our results indicate that robust, comprehensive, and hospital-integrated telehealth are an effective form of health services during the acute phase of a pandemic and beyond. Telephone hotlines require a minimum of technological capabilities, can be implemented rapidly, and are accessible to those who may not have internet access, especially when facilities with public internet access such as libraries are closed. Past research has indicated that telephone calls yield similar patient health outcomes when compared to video-based appointments [20].

Although some communities have described higher rates of infection, hospitalization, and death among low income and racial and ethnic minority patients, data from our hospital system in Northeast Ohio does not indicate any observed racial or socioeconomic disparities in care process or outcome. Our results indicate that employees of the health care system who called the hotline were more likely to be tested, but this is a function of system policies which referred employees with suspect or proven COVID-19 exposure to call the hotline as well as the need to protect patients from potentially infected care personnel. In our population, we found no association between current smoking status and emergency room visits or hospitalization after a telephone encounter for patients with COVID-19-related symptoms. This finding is consistent with a review of several prior studies outside the United States which found little evidence for the influence of tobacco smoking on COVID-19 outcomes.[22] However, prior investigations and reviews have been confined to case series designs derived from data reported to public health agencies or to hospitalized patients which limit the ability to include important covariates and excludes untested patients reporting acute respiratory illness.[22-25]

The results of our study have several important limitations. We report on a hotline from a single, large health care system serving an urban area of Northeast Ohio. Our findings may not be generalizable to other health systems or areas due to variation in COVID-19 government and public health response. Although we included data available through Epic’s Care Everywhere health information exchange, we may not have captured all data from other regional care systems, and some patients may have received services at other hospitals or emergency rooms that are not available for our analyses. However, two of the three major health systems in Cuyahoga County use the Epic EHR, and COVID-19 test results from all three systems (covering more than 90% of all acute care) were captured in our data, suggesting any missed utilization may be minimal.

Prior research has demonstrated that telephone hotlines are a convenient and efficient mode of information distribution from health care providers to a large population, and our data indicates that a significant number of our study population sought advice or information as the primary reason for calling. [8]. Readily accessible information and medical care during a pandemic is a crucial public health function as it can directly reduce demand for emergency services and efficiently provide large numbers of symptomatic and potentially infected persons guidance about how to stay at home and protect themselves and others. The vast majority of patients with telehealth visits in our population were advised to seek home care, avoiding the need to seek care at a walk-in clinic or the emergency room.

We did not find evidence of disparities by race and ethnicity or insurance type, which leads us to conclude that telephone hotline services are an accessible and equitable form of care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Services that depend on internet access, such as patient portals, have been shown have lower usage among older adults, racial and ethnic minorities and older people, the very populations most affected by COVID-19 severe disease in the United States. Further, results of our multivariable models indicate that primary care physicians assessing patients over the phone make effective decisions about which patients will require use of emergency services and which can be safely managed at home. By transforming a large number of potential in-person visits to telephone visits our study demonstrates that it is possible to conserve increasingly scarce personal protective equipment, appropriately limit testing, and potentially prevent the further spread of infection to patients and health care workers in otherwise busy in-person care settings. DeVoe and colleagues recently published a plea for a regional telehealth primary care extension infrastructure to address the demands being placed on care systems.[28] Our findings provide evidence for the effectiveness of such an approach, and suggest that policymakers and medical and public health leaders should consider widespread implementation of physician-staffed telehealth services as a key component of effective, equitable pandemic response.

Funding

The MetroHealth System