Abstract
There are currently no disease modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Epidemiological studies have highlighted blood metabolites as potential biomarkers, but possible confounding and reverse causation prevent causal conclusions. Here, we investigated whether nineteen metabolites previously associated with midlife cognitive function, are on the causal pathway to AD.
Summary statistics from the largest Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) for AD and for metabolites were used to perform bi-directional univariable Mendelian Randomisation (MR). Bayesian model averaging MR (MR-BMA) was additionally performed to address high correlation between metabolites and to identify metabolite combinations which may be on the AD causal pathway.
Univariable MR indicated three Extra-Large High-Density Lipoproteins (XL.HDL) to be on the causal pathway to AD: Free Cholesterol (XL.HDL.FC: OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.78-0.94), Total Lipids (XL.HDL.L: OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.80-0.97), and Phospholipids (XL.HDL.PL: OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.81-0.97); significant at an adjusted threshold of p<0.009. MR-BMA corroborated XL.HDL.FC to be amongst the top three causal metabolites, additionally to Total Cholesterol in XL.HDL (XL.HDL.C) and Glycoprotein Acetyls (GP) (posterior probabilities=0.112, 0.113, 0.287 respectively). Both XL.HDL.C and GP also demonstrated suggestive evidence of univariable causal associations (XL.HDL.C:OR=0.88, 95% CI=0.79-0.99; GP:OR=1.2, 95% CI=1.05-1.38); significant at the 5% level.
This study offers insight into the causal relationship between metabolites previously demonstrating association with mid-life cognition, and AD. It highlights GP in addition to several XL.HDLs as causal candidates which warrant further investigation. As the pathological changes underpinning AD are thought to develop decades prior to symptom onset, progressing these findings could hold special value in informing future risk reduction strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was made possible only through generous funding from key funding bodies - PP is funded by Alzheimer’s Research UK and JL is funded by the van Geest endowment fund. This study represents independent research additionally funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data for this work is available within the supplementary material and upon request.