The efficiency in the ordinary hospital bed management in Italy: an in-depth analysis of intensive care unit in the areas affected by COVID-19 before the outbreak

Data

This paper is focused on two main data sources. The first one provides daily data on the diffusion and hospital infrastructure consumption during the COVID-19 outbreak. They are collected by the Italian Civil Protection Department and collected on several web sites [3]. The second information flow concerns data on hospital bed management. Administrative and clinical data produced during the hospitalization process are collected in Discharge Report Forms and sent by the hospital information systems of a single health provider and centrally collected by the Ministry of Health. They describe each service provided to a patient as well as facilities available and staff employed in the relevant structure. This information is aggregated and published in the web site of the Ministry of Health [14]. The data analysed in this study refer to the year 2017, the latest data published by the Ministry of Health. Moreover, data captured for the year 2010 are analysed to examine differences between 2010 and 2017 in terms of resources available across the territory. This study considers both the public and private institutes, excluding the private nursing homes. The datasets gathered from the Ministry of Health website [14] and the relevant analyses performed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository [15].

Methodologies

The overall description of the hospital bed management is assessed using the following indicators computed on the basis of the number of beds, the patient discharged over a specific period of time (i.e. a year) and total number of in-patient days (i.e. the overall number of days that all the patients are hospitalized) [16].

• Beds Occupancy Rate (BOR): percentage of inpatient beds occupied over a specific period;

• Average Length Of Stay (AvLOS): average number of days that an inpatients remained in the hospital;

• Turnover Interval (TOI): number of days that an available bed remains empty between the discharge of a patient and the admission of a next one;

• Beds Turn Over (BTO): average number of patients “passing through” each bed during a specific period.

The authors also adopted reference thresholds for TOI (1<TOI<3) and BOR (BOR>75%). These values have been used to classify each region in the following areas: 1) the red one that identifies regions where both TOI and BOR are outside the reference threshold; 2) the yellow area that reports regions where either TOI or BOR are outside the threshold and 3) the green area that identifies regions where both indicators are within the reference thresholds.

The complexity and the performance of each clinical department in the management of clinical hospitalization cases are described, respectively, by the Case Mix (CMI) and the Performance Index (PI). In particular, the former indicates the degree of complexity in each observed unit with respect to a benchmark level (i.e. the national average), while the PI compares the performance of the observed unit considering the inpatient length of stays compared to the benchmark level.

These indicators are computed according to the following formulas, taking into account the different clinical specialties addressed by the relevant structure.

Where the variables indicate:

• n: number of specialties assessed by the structure;

• : Italian AvLOS of the specialty j;

• : Italian AvLOS of all specialties;

• : number of patient discharges in Italy of the specialty j

• : total number of patient discharges in Italy;

• : AvLOS of the specialty j in the relevant structure;

• : number of patients discharged in the relevant structure for the specialty j;

• : total number of patients discharges in the relevant structure.

A CMI (Equation 1) lower than 1 identifies a structure that manages low-level of complexity clinical cases, whereas a PI (Equation 2) lower than 1 identifies a structure with a high-level of efficacy. Considering the graphical representation, these indicators are analysed adopting a four-quadrant graph where the CMI is reported in the abscissa and the PI is reported in the ordinate compared to the national benchmark.

Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in the hospital bed management in Italy

Since the beginning of the infection through the identification of the first cases in the north of Italy, the number of patients infected closely follows an exponential trend, with a slightly change during the last week turning from an exponential to a linear trend. This tendency is appreciable not only considering the total number cases, but also the number of deaths, healed as well as the number of patients hospitalized in general and in the intensive care units dislocated all over the country. Trends describing the hospitalizations are reported in Figure 1 considering both the country as a whole and the region in particular, that still represents the region with the highest number of cases in Italy. These trends highlight the tremendous amount of work carried out by the healthcare professionals to host the exceptional number of patients to be hospitalized in the health structures.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. Number of patients hospitalized in the Italian and in the region structures in total as well as in the Intensive Care Units [3].

Although all hospital wards are struggling with an exceptional workload due to the COVID-19 outbreak, the intensive care units are particularly stressed given that the majority of the hospitals in the northern part of the country are saturating the hospital beds generally located in this department. Figure 2 summarized the actual occupancy rate of the ICU beds to date (29^th of March 2020). It is important to note that both the number of beds and the number of inpatients is purely indicative: the number of beds refer to the availability of each region in 2019 and does not take into account the epidemic, the number of patients hospitalized refers exclusively to patients affected by COVID-19 and does not take into account patients with other pathologies. As highlighted by the colour, different regions have had already saturated the hospital beds ordinarily available in their intensive care units (Lombardy, Piemonte, Val d’Aosta, Trento, Bolzano), with other regions that are worryingly approaching this threshold (Marche, Emilia Romagna, Toscana, Liguria). To be noted that, as highlighted in the map, all of them are located in the northern part of Italy.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Percentage of beds occupied in the relevant regions considering the number of routinely available hospital beds and the number of patient hospitalized affected by COVID-19. Colours span from green to red depending on the percentage of beds occupied in the intensive care units.

Analysis of the Italian structural components

In this paragraph data collected in the years 2010 and 2017 are compared to capture difference in terms of beds availability, number of hospitalizations and total number of inpatient days. A highlighted in Table 1, an important reduction of the hospital beds is evident all over the Italian regions. This reduction on the same time matches with a reduction of both number of patients hospitalized and number of days spent in the hospital. Differences across the country can be highlighted with the highest reductions in the southern regions. Considering the northern region heavily affected by the COVID-19, the reduction ranges from −5% in Bolzano and Val d’Aosta to −23% in Trento, while Lombardy cuts around the 7% of hospital beds.

A different picture is shown focusing on the intensive care unit. Table 2 highlights that the availability of the number of beds in this department did not change across years with an increasing number of beds around 6% all over the territory. Of course, also in this analysis differences across regions can be detected. However, only five regions have reduced the number of beds in this department with the highest cut found in Lazio, Liguria and Piemonte (5%).

A focus on the reduction of the hospital beds in the different wards is reported in Table 3 highlighting the disciplines that cover the 90% of the hospitalization complexity in terms of the average length of stay. As reported in the Table only oncology and intensive care unit wards have had an increase in the number of beds in Italy, while in other clinical specializations the reduction was even more than 20%, among which surgery, paediatrics and otolaryngology. This indicates that, among the wards that manage complex hospital cases, the availability of hospital beds was not affected by the funding cuts to public health. However, these crude differences may take into account that, in the last years, many European countries have adopted policies to strongly shift the organization and provision of health and social services from formal institutional facilities (e.g. hospitals) to home care [17]. Moreover, recently the provision of different scheduled procedures (e.g. diagnostic test, clinical examinations, treatments) are mainly provided in a day hospital, reducing the number of beds needed to treat the patients.

Other differences that can be detected analysing the availability of hospital beds refers to their distribution in the 21 regions and autonomous provinces. Figure 3 reports the number of beds per 100.000 inhabitants both considering all disciplines (A) and focusing on the intensive care unit departments (B). The proportions vary across the country spanning from Molise that counts the highest values for both categories to Calabria that displays the lowest proportions. In this overall picture, while, generally, the south of Italy suffers the lack of hospital beds, lays in the middle of the rank with 279 beds in total and 8 intensive care unit beds per 100000 inhabitants.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Number of total and intensive care unit beds per 100000 inhabitants in the different Italian regions

Hospital bed management

Table 4 reports the results obtained for each region highlighting the classification in the areas of hospital bed management as well as case-mix and performance indicators. Green cells highlight region where the indicators are above the relevant threshold. Note that while BOR and TOI thresholds are captured in the literature, those for the AvLOS and BTO are computed on the basis of the national average value. Considering the hospital bed management all regions fall within the threshold values both for the BOR and the TOI, with the exception of Molise, Basilicata and Sardegna. Instead, regional differences can be captured considering the AvLOS which highlights which are the regions that tend to extend the patient’s hospital stays comparing to a national benchmarking value (i.e. Lombardy and Liguria) and the BTO that provides an overview of the regions that have a low number of patients as a percentage of available beds (i.e. Lombardy and Molise). The difference in the AvLOS across the country can determine the level of performance of each region also on the basis of the complexity of cases. On the basis of these analyses, regions have been classified in the following four macro-clusters, that mainly represent the classification of the complex and performance indicators as reported in Figure 4:

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4.

Overall classification of each Italian region considering both the hospital bed management indicators and the complexity and performance indicators. In both figures the colour of the marker captures the hospital bed management classification. In the Italian map, regions are coloured on the basis of the ratio between the CMI and PI.

1. Six regions (Abruzzo, Emilia Romagna, Trento, Toscana, Umbria e Basilicata) reported positive results in the management of hospital beds. Moreover, these regions report high performances in the treatment of complex cases, mainly due to short hospitalization with respect to the national average length of stay.

2. The second group of regions (Calabria, Campania, Bolzano e Puglia) has similar results compared to the above cluster, with hospitalizations efficiently managed with high performances. Differently from the above-mentioned group, these regions tend to manage cases that are less complex.

3. Six regions (Friuli Venezia Giulia, Piemonte, Valle D’Aosta, Veneto, Liguria e Lombardy) manage the hospital beds with a high turnover and beds that remain scarcely empty during the year. However, this is mainly due to a high length of stay that result in a low level of performance with respect to the national level, even if these regions mainly manage complex cases.

4. The last group is composed by four regions (Lazio, Marche, Sicilia e Sardegna). Even if they have positive values in the hospital bed turnover and turnover interval, the performance is lower than the national reference value also considering that these regions tend to manage less complex cases.

In this classification the Molise represents an interesting outlier given that it is the only region with both BRO and TOI outside the efficiency thresholds. These features contribute also to the performance of the regional hospitals even if this region tend to manage complex cases.

The analysis reported above is presented in the following, taking into account exclusively the intensive care unit beds and hospitalization flow. Table 5 reported the results of the hospital bed management, complexity and performance indicators. Also in this case, green cells identify efficient regions. In this analysis the thresholds for the four hospital bed management indicators are all defined on the basis of the national average values, given that no reference values are available in the literature. The macro-clusters detected on the basis of both analyses are summarized in the following (Figure 5):

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5.

Overall classification of each Italian region considering both the hospital bed management indicators and the complexity and performance indicators of intensive care units. In both figures the colour of the marker captures the hospital bed management classification. In the Italian map, regions are coloured on the basis of the ratio between the CMI and PI.

1. In three regions (Calabria, Sardegna e Sicilia) all indicators report positive values with respect to the national average ones. They manage complex cases with high performance results. Moreover, the quick turnover and a high percentage of bed occupancy make these regions efficient also in the management of hospital beds.

2. A consistent number of regions (Basilicata, Campania, Molise, Sicilia, Abruzzo, Puglia e Lazio) belong to the second cluster. As reported for the previous group also these regions have a high bed turnover and the number of days between two hospitalization are relatively low. However, differently from the above mention group, these results are mainly due to the high number of days that patients spend in the intensive care unit. Also for this reason, even if these regions tend to cope with complex cases and pathologies, their performance is lower than the national one.

3. In three regions (Liguria, Toscana e Veneto) hospital beds are not efficiently managed with a low performance in the management of not so complex cases. This is mainly due to the low complexity of cases hospitalized with a length of stay higher than the national average value.

4. In the last group of regions (Emilia Romagna, Lombardy, Piemonte, Trento, Umbria, Val D’Aosta, Bolzano) the majority of the hospitalization cases are not efficiently managed with a high value of length of stay for not complex cases.

In this classification Marche represents an outlier in the management of hospital beds. Differently from the last reported cluster it manages complex cases with a relative high performance.