Identification of a super-spreading chain of transmission associated with COVID-19

Patients and data collection

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (No. WDRY2020-K019). Oral consent was obtained from the patients or their family members, whereas written informed consent was waived by the Provincial and National Health Commissions in China under the exceptional circumstances for investigation of an ongoing disease outbreak. In this cohort, we identified a super-spreading chain of transmission involving 52 linked patients with COVID-19 in three separate hospitals in Wuhan, the epicenter of an outbreak of COVID-19 across China. The data we retrieved from the electronic medical records included demographic features, comorbidities, clinical presentation, laboratory investigation, RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2, serum specific IgM and IgG antibodies, chest computed tomographic (CT) scan, and the disease outcome. The contact and exposure history were also collected through communications with the patients and/or their family members.

Case definition

All patients with COVID-19 enrolled in this study were diagnosed and classified according to World Health Organization interim guidance and the “Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of the Novel Coronavirus Infected Pneumonia” developed by the National Health Commission of People’s Republic of China^26,27. The severe cases showed at least one of the following presentations: (1) Respiratory distress, Respiratory rate (RR)⩾30 times/min; (2) At rest, oxygen saturation⩽93%; (3) Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) /Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO₂) 300mmHg (1mmHg=0.133kPa). Patients who had close contact with the index patient were defined as secondary cases. Patients who contracted the disease from the secondary cases were classified as tertiary cases.

Laboratory investigations

The routine laboratory investigations were performed by the certified clinical diagnostic laboratories inside the designated hospitals. The RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 were conducted by the Standard Operation Procedures published previously^28,29. Serum specific IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected using the immunoassay kit provided by the YHLO Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China) and the fully-automated chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer (UniCel DxI800, Beckman Coulter, Inc., USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturers. The immune activities were measured as a relative light unit (RLU). The analyzer automatically converts the RLU from the immunoassay into an absolute unit by fitting the standard master calibration curve. A cutoff value of ⩾10.0 AU/ml is considered as positive for both antibodies.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, all of the continuous variables were performed by Shaprio-wilk test and Levene test to analyze normality and homogeneity. Continuous variables were expressed as median (IQR) and compared with T test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were expressed as number (n/N%) and compared by χ² test, continuity-adjusted χ² test or Fisher’s exact test. A two-sided α of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were done using the SPSS 22.0 software.

Identification of the index patient (C-1)

On January 3, 2020, a male patient in his 50s developed fever (38.8°C), headache, chest pain and myalgias when he visited his relative in a ward room (Ward-X in Figure 1) shared by four female cancer patients at Hospital A. He initially thought that he had a “cold” and continued to visit this ward until he was admitted to hospital B on January 10, 2020. His Chest CT-scan findings showed a rapid progression of bilateral infiltrates in the lungs (Figure 2). He received antibiotics treatment for one week but was ineffective. On January 18, he was tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and diagnosed with COVID-19. He died of severe respiratory failure on January 26, 2020. While the exact exposure history of this patient remained unclear, he did not visit the “Huanan Wet Market”, the suspected origin for this outbreak in Wuhan. Of note, the “Huanan Wet Market” is located in the Hankou District of Wuhan city, which is separated from the Wuchang District by the Yangtse River. The two hospitals (A and B) where the index patient visited were located in Wuchang District.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Representative chest CT images of the index patient (C-1) showing rapid progression of bilateral infiltrating shadows in the lungs.

A. An image taken on 01/10/2020 (the admission day);

B. An image taken on 01/13/2020 (three days after admission);

C. An image taken on 01/16/2020 (6 days after admission).

A super-spreading event initiated by the index patient

Eleven people presented fever and abnormal CT-scan findings after close contacts with the index patient C-1 between January 3 and January 10, 2020 (Figure 1 and Table 1). Below was a timeline for the initial transmission events. (1) C-1 visited his relative C-2 in Ward-X that was shared by other three cancer patients (C-3, C4, and C-5) at the Department-I of hospital A when he first developed fever and other symptoms on January 3. All four cancer patients had close contacts with C-1 and subsequently developed fever (38°C-40°C) and abnormal CT-scan findings between January 4 and January 15. All were RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2, but the assays for the serum specific antibodies were not available at that time. All four patients did not have other exposure records and epidemiological history before their disease onsets. Three of them died of severe respiratory failure within 9-20 days after the onsets. C-2 developed symptoms on January 9 (6 days after the onset of C-1) and died on January 17. C-3 developed symptoms on January 4 (one day after her close contact with C-1) and died on January 24. C-4 developed symptoms on January 15 and transferred to a designated hospital on January 30, where she remained at a stable condition after the treatment. C-5 developed symptoms on January 15 and died on January 29.

On January 3, C-1 also visited the office area of the health care workers at the Department-I of hospital A to discuss the treatment plan for his relative C-2. Four doctors (C-6, C-7, C-8 and C-9) and one nurse (C-10) developed fever and abnormal CT-scan findings between January 9 and January13 (within 10 days after close contacts with C-1). In addition, a cluster of eleven health care workers (C-17 to C-27) from the same department who had close contact with their co-workers (C-6 to C-10) presented fever and abnormal CT-scan findings between January 16 and January 21 (within 3-12 days after their exposure to the secondary cases). All the health care workers were previously healthy and did not have other exposure records and epidemiological history (Figure 1 and Table 1).

On January 10, C-1 was admitted to hospital B, where he was diagnosed with COVID-19. Two doctors (C-51 and C-52) had close contacts with C-1 when they met with him on a medical consultation meeting to discuss his treatment plan. They presented fever and abnormal CT-scan findings on January 21 and January 26, respectively. Both of them were previously healthy and did not have other exposure records and epidemiological history. Our findings suggested that C-1 was the source patient and considered as a “super-spreader” who initiated this super-spreading chain of transmission.

Another super-spreading event initiated by a doctor from Department-II in hospital A

Between January 14 and January 20, 2020, a total of twelve doctors and nurses (C-29 to C-40) from Department-II in hospital A developed fever and abnormal CT-scan findings (Figure 1 and Table 1). All twelve individuals were previously healthy, and none of them except C-29 had other exposure records and epidemiological history. C-29, a male doctor in his 50s, attended medical consultation meetings between January 3 and January 8 at the Department-I to discuss treatment plans for two lung cancer patients (C-2 and C-3). Of note, Department-I and Department-II were located at two separate buildings in hospital A. C-29 had close contact with the health care workers (C-6 to C-10) on the consultation meetings before he developed fever and abnormal CT-scan findings, and was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 14. All eleven co-workers (C-30 to C-40) had close contacts with C-29 before his disease onset. In addition, C-29’s relative (C-41) was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 25. Our findings indicated that C-29 was likely the source patient who was responsible for introduction of COVID-19 into this cluster, and therefore was considered as a “super-spreader”.

A cluster of tertiary cases linked to a gastric cancer patient

C-13, a female with gastric cancer, was initially hospitalized in Ward-Y at Department-I in hospital A. She was transferred to Department-III on January 10 and had surgical operation on January 12. She had close contacts with C-9 and C-10 who were in charge of her treatment at Department-I, However, she did not present fever and other symptoms until January 15 (i.e. 3 days after her surgical operation). She was transferred to a designated hospital after her confirmation with COVID-19 on January 23 and remained at a stable condition. Two Doctors (C-14 and C-15) who conducted the operation procedures were diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 21 and January 22, respectively. In addition, C-16 (C-15’s relative) showed fever and other symptoms on January 23 after close contact with C-16 at home.

A cluster of tertiary cases linked to a colon cancer patient

C-42, a female colon cancer patient, was admitted to the same hospital ward room (Ward-Y) as C-13 on January 10 and treated by the same medical team (C-9 and C-10). She developed fever (39.9°C) and other symptoms on January 16, and died of severe respiratory failure on January 18. She did not take CT-scan and RT-PCR testing due to her sudden death. C-43, a male doctor from Department-V examined C-42 on January 15, and was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 23 (8 days after his close contact with C-42). Moreover, C-44 was accompanying his relative C-42 in hospital A and diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 17 (one day after the disease onset of C-42). Two doctors (C-45 and C-46) who conducted the medical treatment on C-44 at Department-V in hospital A were diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 24 and January 25, respectively. Furthermore, C-44 was transferred to hospital C on January 17. Four doctors (C-47, C-48, C-49, and C-50) at hospital C had close contacts with C-44, and developed fever and other symptoms between January 24 and January 27. Our findings also suggested that C-44 was a potential “super-spreader” since he transmitted the disease to six people who had direct contacts with him.

Additional tertiary cases

(1) C-11 was diagnosed with COVID-19 after direct contact with his relative C-10 at home. (2) C-12, a male doctor from the Department-VI, conducted medical treatment on C-4 and C-5 on January 14, and was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 19 (5 days after direct contacts with C-4 and C-5). (3) C-28, a male liver cancer patient in his 60s (Ward-Z), was diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 20 (4 days after the disease onset of his doctor C-17) and died of respiratory failure on January 23, 2020.

Clinical features and laboratory findings

(Figure 1, Table 1, and Table 2). There were 31 female and 21 male patients in this cohort, and the median age was 37 years (range: 22-79 years). None of them were linked to the “Huanan Wet Market”, the suspected origin for this outbreak in Wuhan. Each of them, however, had a contact history with the index patient C-1 or his close contacts. Approximately 87% (45/52) of the patients had fever or other symptoms, 96% (50/52) had abnormal chest CT-scan findings, 86% of the tested patients (39/45) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the nasopharyngeal or throat swab specimen, 85% of the tested patients (29/34) were positive for SARS-CoV-2-specific IgM and/or IgG, 15% of the RT-PCR positive patients were tested negative for the specific IgM and/or IgG at the convalescent phase, and 15% of the RT-PCR negative patients were tested positive for the specific IgM and/or IgG. The severe patients experienced a significant decrease in oximetry saturation, lymphocyte, and platelet counts, along with a significant increase in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase. Five of the seven cancer patients (71%) died within 2-20 days of the disease onset. All six fatal cases had comorbidities, whereas all the health care workers were previously heathy individuals.