Abstract
Background Psychotic disorders are associated with reductions in brain volume, but the timing and causes of these reductions remain unclear. In particular, the effects of antipsychotic medication and illness have been difficult to disentangle due to a lack of prospective, longitudinal, randomized placebo-controlled designs.
Methods We conducted a triple-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial where 62 antipsychotic naïve patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) received either an atypical antipsychotic or a placebo pill over a treatment period of 6 months. Both FEP groups received intensive psychosocial therapy. A healthy control group (n=27) was also recruited. Structural MRI scans were obtained at baseline, 3-months and 12-months. Our primary aim was to differentiate illness-related brain volume changes from medication-related changes within the first 3 months of treatment. We secondarily investigated long-term effects at the 12-month timepoint.
Outcome From baseline to 3 months, we observed a significant group × time interaction in the pallidum, such that patients receiving atypical antipsychotics showed increased volume, patients on placebo showed decreased volume, and healthy controls showed no change. In patients, a greater increase in pallidal grey matter volume over 3 months was associated with a greater reduction in symptom severity, consistent with a neuroprotective effect of atypical antipsychotics. We additionally found preliminary evidence for illness-related volume reductions in prefrontal cortices at 12 months and putative antipsychotic-related neurotoxicity in cerebellum at both 3-months and 12-months.
Interpretation Our findings indicate that psychotic illness and antipsychotic exposure exert distinct and spatially distributed effects on brain volume. Our results align with prior work in suggesting that the therapeutic efficacy of antipsychotics may be primarily mediated through their effects on the basal ganglia.
Trial registration ACTRN12607000608460.
Competing Interest Statement
Conflict of interest disclosures None reported - to be finalised
Clinical Trial
ACTRN12607000608460
Funding Statement
Funding and medication support that was provided to this study by Janssen-Cilag, Australia (2007-2012) as an unrestricted investigator-initiated grant. The study was supported by grant 1064704 from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Role of the Funder/Sponsor The funding source had no role in the design or conduct of the study: collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.