Facemask shortage and the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak: Reflection on public health measures

Introduction

An increasing number of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia cases were initially identified in Wuhan, Hubei province, China in December 2019. The Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (NCP) was mainly transmitted via respiratory droplets and can be transmitted between humans ^1-3. Common symptoms include fever, cough, dyspnoea, and myalgia or fatigue while less common symptoms include sputum production, headache, haemoptysis, and diarrhoea ⁴. In the early February 2020, the reported incidence of NCP cases exceeded 40,000 in China, of which more than 70% was in Hubei province ^5,6. Globally, Thailand, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Malaysia, France, Canada, Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States and 12 other countries had reported cases infected by 2019-nCoV ⁷. Most of the confirmed cases are travellers from or ever been to Wuhan or other Chinese cities; however, locally transmitted cases outside of China have also been reported ⁶.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) guidance on prevention and control of the NCP outbreak recommends hand and respiratory hygiene and the use of appropriate personal protective equipment for healthcare workers in practice and patients with suspected 2019-nCoV infection should be offered a medical mask ⁸. Regarding the respiratory hygiene measures, facemask wearing has been considered as one of the most cost-effective and important measures to prevent the NCP infection, but it has become a social concern due to the recent facemask shortage in China ^9-11.

In the past few years, China had been the major facemask producer in the world, contributing to 50% of the global production ⁹. At the usual time, China can produce about 20 million facemasks per day while the productivity during the Chinese New Year holiday was lower (12 million facemasks per day) ¹². However, even if the full productivity could be achieved, 20 million facemasks per day do not seem to meet the need of a population of 1·4 billion in China. Thus, between 24 Jan and 30 Jan, the Chinese government imported more than 56 million facemasks ¹². To control the NCP epidemic, the Chinese government also extended the Chinese New Year holiday to allow for home quarantine and reduce the need for facemasks and other medical resources.

In this study, we simulated the facemask availability during the NCP outbreak using a mathematical model based on the actual development of the outbreak and public health intervention introduced by the Chinese government. We aim to investigate the situation of the facemask shortage and provide insight into the development of emergency plans for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Method

Results

Figure 1 shows the cumulative numbers of confirmed cases and deaths of the NCP and the public health intervention introduced by the Chinese government from 31 Dec 2019 to 9 Feb 2020, e.g., identification of pathogen, activation of different levels of emergency response, announcement of protocols and guidelines for healthcare workers and the general population to follow, legislation facemask wearing in public, and lockdown of about 13 cities in Hubei province. From municipal level, provincial level, to national level, the Chinese government had implemented various strategies to control and prevent the spread of NCP.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Timeline of public health intervention during the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (NCP) outbreak in China. (Publicly available data from official websites of the National Health Commission (NHC), the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the People’s Republic of China.)

Figure 2 shows our prediction of the facemask availability during the NCP outbreak. Specifically, if the NCP outbreak only occurred in Hubei province (Scenario 1), the supplies of facemasks in the whole of China would have been sufficient for the daily consumption in this region. However, if the NCP outbreak occurred in Hubei and Guangdong provinces (Scenario 2), facemasks available in the whole of China could supply these two provinces for about 34 days (from 31 Dec 2019 to 1 Feb 2020) with the implementation of existing public health intervention. After the release of the first NHC technical protocol on 15 Jan 2020, we estimated the duration of sufficient facemask supplies in this scenario would be 18 days. By mid-February, there would be a shortage of about 480 million facemasks in these provinces. In Scenario 3, in which we assumed the NCP outbreak occurred in the whole of China, facemasks supplies could only last for about 16 days (from 31 Dec 2019 to 16 Jan 2020). The shortage would appear only one day after the release of the first NHC technical protocol. By mid-February, there would be a shortage of approximate 11·5 billion facemasks in China.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Facemask availability during the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (NCP) outbreak in China.

Discussion

In this study, we summarized the public health intervention introduced by the Chinese government during the NCP outbreak and simulated the facemask shortage in three scenarios. Our results suggested that if the NCP outbreak only occurred in Hubei province, a facemask shortage would not have happened. However, if the outbreak spreads to Guangdong province or even the whole of China, a shortage of facemask would appear in less than a month and could be substantial assuming the current public health intervention being maintained and no additional intervention.

Since the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and H7N9 in the early 21^th century, China has established and strengthened local and national emergency response systems and collaborations with WHO and international scientific communities ¹⁶. Chinese government has taken rapid and various actions to control the NCP outbreak, such as lockdown of cities, temporary shutdown of the transportation system, and legislation on mandatory facemasks wearing in public ¹⁷. However, the controlling a novel infectious disease outbreak can still be challenging. Research on infectious disease epidemic has been focusing mostly on predicting diseases spread and determining original infection source, and public health intervention to reduce transmission ^18-21, while studies investigating the burden on medical resources are lacking. Our findings showed that facemask shortage is very likely to occur when a novel infectious diseases outbreak occurred in a wide range of areas in China. A full daily productivity of facemasks cannot meet the needs of the huge population if the outbreak occurred in Hubei and Guangdong provinces. If the outbreak spreads to the whole of China, the facemask shortage would not relieve in a short time even by importing globally and increasing productivity, which can lead to panic buying ²². Therefore, governments should consider the productivity, import, and storage of facemasks when planning for public health intervention, so as to maintain the availability and affordability of facemasks on the market. In addition, the need for other medical supplies, such as medical protective textiles and home-use disinfectant, could increase if the epidemic did not fade out. Meanwhile, timely and effective communication with the public is essential to mitigate social anxiety and panic buying, and alternative public health intervention are necessary, such as transport shutdown, school closure, and arrangement for effective home quarantine ^10,22,23.

Although our analysis was based on the NCP outbreak in China, infectious disease outbreak could occur in other countries as well. Lessons could be learned from the experience during the NCP outbreak in China (Table 2). Government in each country should revisit their emergency response plan for controlling infectious disease outbreak in the local context. To avoid massive shortage of medical resources, the supply and demand should be closely monitored, and a certain amount of storage based on past experience should be maintained. The emergency plan should also include strategies to increase supply (production and import) and reduce demand during the critical period. In order to prevent the development of a global pandemic from a regional epidemic, a global collaboration to ease the medical resources crisis in the affected countries during an infectious disease outbreak should be established. With the shared information within the collaborated countries, the WHO could evaluate the severity of the outbreak and the availability of medical resources. Timely actions, such as increasing global productivity and distributing global storage, could be taken to minimize the risk of shortage.

Strengths and Limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the facemask availability during the NCP outbreak in China. We have summarized in detail the management strategies implemented by the Chinese governments and considered three scenarios for the outbreak development. Nevertheless, there are some limitations in this study. First, our estimation relied on the assumption of the effectiveness of public health intervention which was limited by the data availability during the outbreak. Our assumption that each healthcare worker would consume two facemasks per day (α) was conservative. In the early stage of the outbreak, facemask supplies were sufficient and healthcare workers could have used several facemasks each day for better protection. Second, we did not take into account logistics cost that could limit the supplies on the markets. Thus, our analysis is likely to underestimate the severity of the facemask shortage experiencing by the healthcare workers and the general population. Third, we didn’t consider the types of facemasks that should be used by individuals at different risk levels ²⁴. Considering the gap between the production of surgical masks, KN95/N95 respirators and medical protective masks (totally 2,200,000¹² per day) and the number of healthcare workers (about 12 million in 2018¹⁴) in China, the MIIT suggested to reserve as many as the KN95/N95 respirators and medical protective masks for frontline healthcare workers ²⁵. The situation of facemasks shortage might be more severe when considering the demand for different types of facemasks from healthcare workers and the general population. Fourth, our prediction ended in mid-February considering the epidemic peak was predicted to be at about the same time ¹³. However, if the transmissibility of the epidemic could be reduced, the peak would be delayed ²⁶, the daily incidence and the demand for facemasks and other medical supplies would also decrease. Nevertheless, the anxiety in the population may result in a constant demand for facemasks even when the epidemic is under controlled.

Conclusion and policy implication

In light of the novel coronavirus outbreak in China, insufficient medical resources (e.g., shortage of facemasks) can considerably compromise the efficacy of public health measures. An effective public health intervention should also consider the adequacy and affordability of existing medical resources. Governments across the world should revisit their emergency response plans for controlling infectious disease outbreaks so as to avoid medical resource crisis. Global collaboration should be strengthened to prevent the development of a global pandemic from a regional epidemic via easing the medical resources crisis in the affected countries.

Declaration of interests

No conflicts of interest

Data sharing statement

All data used in this study are publicly available. Data sources are described in the method section.

Funding of source

No funding in this study

Contributor statement