Abstract
Background The ability to flexibly apply rules to novel situations is a critical aspect of adaptive human behavior. Evidence from traditional neuropsychological tests suggest that broad executive function deficits appear early in the course of psychosis, but it is unclear which specific facets are affected. Identifying whether rule learning is impacted at the early stages of psychosis are necessary for truly understanding the etiology of psychosis and may be critical for designing novel treatments. Therefore, we examined rule learning in healthy adolescents and those meeting criteria for clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis.
Methods 24 control and 22 CHR adolescents underwent rapid, high-resolution fMRI while performing a paradigm which required them to apply novel or practiced task rules.
Results Previous work with this task has suggested that practiced rules rely on rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) during task preparation and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during task performance, while novel rules showed the opposite pattern. In controls, we partially replicated this finding with a small effect of greater activity in RLPFC for practiced versus novel tasks; however, the CHR group showed a dysfunctional pattern of results. Not only did the CHR group show alternations in the expected brain dynamics, but they showed weaker effects than controls during both task preparation and task performance.
Conclusions These findings suggest that the critical ability to flexibly apply abstract rules is already disrupted at the clinical high risk stage of psychosis. However, more data is needed to determine whether these deficits predict disease progression.
Competing Interest Statement
VAM is a consultant to Takeda Pharmaceuticals. The other authors have no competing interests
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health R01MH094650 to V.A.M.. J.M.O. was supported by F32DA034412 and by start-up funds from Texas A&M University. J.A.B. was supported by NIH F32MH102898, a Brain & Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Award as the Donald & Janet Boardman Family Investigator, and by start-up funds from Texas A&M University.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.