ABSTRACT
Introduction Optimal outcomes in total hip arthroplasty are dependent on appropriate placement of femoral and acetabular components, with technological advances providing a platform for guiding component placement to reduce the risk of malpositioned components during surgery. This study will validate the intraoperative data captured using a handheld imageless THA navigation system against postoperative measurements of acetabular inclination, anteversion, leg length, and femoral offset on CT radiographs.
Methods and analysis This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted within a single-centre, single-surgeon private practice. Data will be collected for 35 consecutive patients (>18years) undergoing elective THA surgery, from the research registry established at the surgeon’s practice. The primary outcome is the agreement between intraoperative component positioning data captured by the navigation system compared to postoperative measurements using computed tomography (CT). A total of ten CT scans will be re-assessed for inter- and intra-observer reliability. The influence of patient and surgical factors on the accuracy of component position will also be examined with multivariable linear regression.
Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval for this study was provided through a certified ethics committee (Bellberry HREC approval number 2017-07-499). The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study will assess the accuracy of an imageless THA navigation system for measurement of component positioning against postoperative computed tomography analysis as gold standard.
A sample size of n=35 participants will ensure adequate power to detect differences between intraoperative navigation results and postoperative CT measurements.
A sample size of n=10 will provide adequate confidence to establish intra and inter-observer reliability of postoperative measurements of component positioning via CT analysis.
This study will enable a mechanism to detect potential discrepancies between the component positioning measurement methods intrinsic to the Naviswiss™ device and postoperative CT analysis method and identify any corrective factors required for direct comparison of the two methods.
Competing Interest Statement
CS, NE and JI declare funding received by Naviswiss AG for the conduct of the study and the preparation of the protocol. AR is employed by ActiveSurgical Pty Ltd, which is the local distributor for the Naviswiss system. JI is a shareholder in the medical technology company and manufacturer, Naviswiss AG.
Clinical Trial
This is a protocol for a trial which has yet to begin recruiting. Registration of this study with the ANZCTR is currently in progress.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by Naviswiss AG.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
As this is a study protocol, there is no data available.
