Abstract
Objectives To evaluate legibility, comprehension, and clinical usability of visual aids to communicate cancer treatment paths.
Design Questionnaire study. Two open-label, cross-sectional questionnaires, a single-centered, patient questionnaire.
Setting Two online questionnaires, one in-person questionnaire (patients with haematological neoplasms at the University Hospital Dresden, Germany).
Participants Online questionnaires included 306 and 160 participants respectively (18 to >60 yrs). Clinical evaluation included 30 patients (44 to 72 yrs), 11 were re-surveyed, 24 responses from attending physicians.
Main Outcome Measures Participants ability to understand cancer treatment paths with audio information, or supplemented with two formats of visual aids; to comprehend visual representations for key treatment terms; patients ability to understand and recall their cancer treatment path.
Results Visual aids, pictogram- or text-based, significantly improved participants response quality (mean response quality 0.81 pictogram/0.84 text, audio: 0.68, p< 0.001), increased response confidence (mean confidence 0.84 pictogram/0.86 text, audio: 0.66, p< 0.001), and information was rated higher (mean information quality rating 0.85 pictogram/0.82 text, audio: 0.71, p< 0.001). In the visual aids, key terms were encoded with visual representations. 7/8 terms were comprehensible as pictograms (>85% transparency), fewer when encoded as comics or photos (5/8 and 4/8 >85% transparency). Comprehensibility is term-specific, i.e., no pictogram tested significantly more understandable than comic, 3 were more comprehensible than photos (p < 0.001). In clinical questionnaires, patients were able to comprehend information about treatment paths (mean response quality 0.82) and recall this (mean response quality 0.71 after several weeks). Patients (n=30) and physicians (n=24) rated the visual aids as very or partially helpful.
Conclusions Visual aids to communicate cancer treatment path information are legible and increase short- and long-term comprehension. Patients and physicians welcome integration of visual aids to supplement communication about cancer treatments.
Ethics review Patient interviews were reviewed by TU Dresden ethics board (BO-EK-338072022).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The following fundings supported this study: HKJ received a salary from a habilitation award of the Medical Faculty of the Technische Universitaet Dresden. HKJ and MB received project funding from the Hochschulstiftung Medizin Dresden. MB received funding from the MSNZ program of the Deutsche Krebshilfe. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The clinical evaluation, including the patients consent form, was approved by the TU Dresden ethics board (BO-EK-338072022).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
