Abstract
Background Racially and ethnically minoritized autistic individuals face intersectional disparities in access to services and research representation. Prior work tends to overlook individual preferences, lived expertise, and the of language skills in services. To address this gap, this community-based participatory study examines the presence and correlates of services in minoritized autistic adolescents and adults varying in language skills.
Method Participants (N = 73, ages 13-30, >50% with language scores ≤ −1.25 SD and ∼30% with NVIQ < 70 to 84) completed a behavioral assessment protocol. Participants and caregivers completed questionnaires. Descriptive and regression analyses evaluated patterns and predictors of number of services received, unmet needs, and barriers.
Results Participants received multiple services yet had multiple unmet service needs and barriers. Effects of individual differences and social-ecological variables on services received, unmet needs, and barriers varied in presence and magnitude when using a categorical versus continuous approach to individual differences.
Implications While the number of services received and unmet needs were similar to prior work, examination of individual services, unmet needs, and barriers suggested differences. Effects point to nuance in experiences during the transition to adulthood and motivate use of participatory approaches to build the evidence base informing practice and advocacy.
Learning outcomes After reading the article, the learner will be able to: 1) summarize knowledge gaps about access to services; 2) explain why evidence-based practice motivates use of a community-based participatory approach; and 3) describe implications of study findings for clinicians and autistic individuals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by an American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation New Investigators Research Grant (PI: Girolamo).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of University of Connecticut gave ethical approval for this work. IRB of San Diego State University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are unavailable due to participants opting not to share their de-identified data in a dynamic consent process.
