ABSTRACT
Pyrexia is a frequent adverse event of BRAF/MEK-inhibitor combination therapy in patients with metastasized malignant melanoma (MM). The study’s objective was to identify laboratory changes which might correlate with the appearance of pyrexia. Initially, data of 38 MM (14 with pyrexia) patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib were analysed retrospectively. Graphical visualization of time series of laboratory values suggested that a rise in C-reactive-protein, in parallel with a fall of leukocytes and thrombocytes, were indicative of pyrexia. Additionally, statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and pyrexia. An algorithm based on these observations was designed using a deductive approach in order to calculate a pyrexia score (PS) for each laboratory assessment in treated patients. A second independent data set with 28 MM patients (8 with pyrexia) was used for the validation of the algorithm. PS based on the four parameters CRP, LDH, leukocyte and thrombocyte numbers, were statistically significantly higher in pyrexia patients, differentiated between groups (F=20,8; p=<0,0001) and showed a significant predictive value for the development of pyrexia (F=6,24; p=0,013). We provide first evidence that pyrexia in patients treated with BRAF/MEK-blockade can be identified and predicted by an algorithm that calculates a score.
SUMMARY STATEMENT Pyrexia is a severe side effect of BRAF/MEK-inhibitor therapy of malignant melanoma. An algorithm based on the four laboratory values, leukocyte and thrombocyte counts, CRP and LDH, was designed for detecting pyrexia. The used heuristic approach might serve as a blueprint for analysing unevenly sampled or even incomplete clinical data.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. A.R. has received travel grants and consulting remunerations from Roche, MSD, BMS, Amgen and Novartis as well as a research grant from Novartis unrelated to the presented study.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, gave ethical approval for this work(ethic vote 257/19). Due to the purely retrospective nature of the performed data analysis, patient informed consent was not deemed necessary by the Ethics Commitee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* These authors share last authorship
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
