(ii) Abstract
Background To prevent nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2, infection control measures are implemented for patients with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 until reliable test results are available. This delay targeted admission to the most appropriate ward based on the medical condition. SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests and point of care (POC) rapid RT-PCR were introduced at emergency departments (EDs) in late 2020, but the consequence on targeted admission is unknown.
Objectives To assess the effect of RAD tests and POC rapid RT-PCR (VitaPCR, Credo Diagnostics, Singapore) on targeted admission.
Methods Patients presenting at the ED of a referral hospital (N = 2,940) between 13-Nov-2020 and 12-Jan-2021 were included. The study period was delimited by introduction of RAD tests and VitaPCR. Participant data was collected retrospectively, and outcome variables were length-of-stay (LoS), intrahospital transfers and targeted admission to COVID-19 ward.
Results RAD tests reduced ED LoS for participants with positive tests or that were not tested. Negative VitaPCR results reduced mean hospital LoS by 1.5 (95%CI: 0.3–2.7) days and admissions to COVID-19 wards from 34.5 (95%CI: 28.9-40.5) to 14.7 (95%CI: 11.1-19.1) per 100 admissions. Introduction of VitaPCR reduced transfers between hospital wards in the first 5 days from 50.0 (95%CI: 45.0-55.0) to 34.0 (95%CI: 30.3-37.9) per 100 admissions.
Conclusion RAD tests enabled rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection which had pronounced effects on LoS at the ED. VitaPCR added the possibility of exclusion of the infection which increased targeted admissions, reduced intrahospital transfers and lead to shorter stay at the hospital.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (MP #2018-06924,), Swedish Society for Medical Research (MP, MI), the Royal Physiographical Society (MP) and Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (MI).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2021-00475).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
