Abstract
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and the beta variant virus neutralization capacity between 2 and 3 mRNA vaccine series in nursing home residents, and between nursing home and assisted living residents strongly supports 3rd dose vaccine recommendations, and equivalent polices for nursing homes and assisted living settings. Findings suggest that residents mount a robust humoral response to a 3rd mRNA vaccination, and have greater neuralization capacity compared to a 2 dose series.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by a grant from Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force and Public Health Agency of Canada.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All protocols were approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board, and informed consent was obtained (HiREB #13059).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding Sources: This work was funded by a grant from Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force and Public Health Agency of Canada awarded to APC and DMEB. DMEB is the Canada Research Chair in Aging & Immunity. APC is the Schlegel Chair in Clinical Epidemiology and Aging. Funding support for this work was provided by grants from the Ontario Research Foundation, COVID-19 Rapid Research Fund, and by the Canadian COVID-19 Immunity Task Force awarded to IN. MSM is supported, in part, by an Ontario Early Researcher Award.
Additional Information: Data in this study were collected by the COVID-in-LTC Study Group. Members of the COVID-in-LTC Study Group include Jonathan L. Bramson, PhD; Eric D. Brown, PhD; Kevin Brown, PhD; David C. Bulir, MD, PhD; Judah A. Denburg, MD; George A. Heckman, MD, MSc; Michael P. Hillmer, PhD; John P. Hirdes, PhD; Aaron Jones, PhD; Mark Loeb, MD, MSc; Janet E. McElhaney, MD; Ishac Nazy, PhD; Nathan M. Stall, MD; Parminder Raina, PhD; Marek Smieja, MD, PhD; Kevin J. Stinson, PhD; Ahmad Von Schlegell; Arthur Sweetman, PhD; Chris Verschoor, PhD; Gerry Wright, PhD. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. The authors have no financial relationship with any organization that may have an interest, and have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
