Abstract
As different SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge and with the continuous evolution of sub-lineages of the delta and other variants, it is crucial that all countries carry out sequencing of at least >1% of their infections, in order to detect emergence of variants with higher transmissibility and with ability to evade immunity. However, as many resource-poor countries are unable to sequence adequate number of viruses, we compared to usefulness of a commercially available multiplex real-time PCR assay to detect important single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the variants and compared the sensitivity, accuracy and cost effectiveness of the Illumina sequencing platform and the Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ (ONT) platform. 138/143 (96.5%) identified as the alpha and 36/39 (92.3%) samples identified as the delta variants due to the presence of lineage defining SNPs by the multiplex real time PCR, were assigned to the same lineage by either of the two sequencing platforms. 34/37 of the samples sequenced by ONT had <5% ambiguous bases, while 21/37 samples sequenced using the Illumina generated <15% ambiguous bases. However, the mean PHRED scores averaged at 32.35 by Illumina reads but 10.78 in ONT. Sub-consensus single nucleotide variations (SNV) were highly correlated between both platforms (R2=0.79) while indels showed a weaker correlation (R2=0.13).
Although the ONT had a slightly higher error rate compared to the Illumina technology, it achieved higher coverage with a lower number of reads, generated less ambiguous bases and was significantly cheaper than Illumina sequencing technology.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
World Health Organization; World bank, Sri Lanka Covid 19 Emergency Response and Health Systems Preparedness Project (ERHSP) of Ministry of Health Sri Lanka funded by World Bank.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the study was obtained by the Ethics Review Committee of the University of Sri Jayewardenepura.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and figures.
