ABSTRACT
Objective This study assessed the risk perception and preventive behavioral practice towards COVID-19 just prior to the second wave of corona, as well as the impact of perceived risk on preventive practices.
Design, setting, participants, and outcome measures A cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2020 and January 2021, involving 1382 respondents aged 18 years and above from all eight divisions in Bangladesh. We used multiple linear regression to identify sociodemographic predictors of risk perception and multiple logistic regression to determine the relationship between risk perception and preventive practice.
Results Low risk perception regarding COVID-19 was present among one-fifth of the respondents (19.8%). Younger age, being male, low education, single marital status, and rural residence were significantly associated with a low perceived risk of COVID-19. Hand washing and wearing mask were practiced by 80% and 67% of respondents, respectively. A low prevalence was noticed for social distancing (31%), avoiding social gathering (31%), and covering face while coughing/sneezing (18%). Furthermore, respondents with a high risk perception were found to be more likely than those with a low risk perception to practice all recommended COVID-19 preventive behaviors-hand washing (OR=2.4, 95% CI=1.5, 3.7), mask use (OR=3.4, 95% CI=2.3, 5), social distancing (OR=3.7, 95% CI=2.4, 5.6), sanitizer use (OR=2.7, 95% CI=1.8, 4.1), avoiding gathering (OR=2.3, 95% CI=1.6, 3.5), avoid touching face and mouth (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.5, 5.3), and covering mouth while coughing/sneezing (OR=7, 95% CI=3.6, 13.4).
Conclusion Considerable number of Bangladeshi adults had low risk perception and low practice of some vital COVID-19 preventive behaviors before the onset of second wave of corona. All preventive practices were also influenced by respondent’s risk perception. This highlights the importance of strengthening and optimizing risk communication strategy even when the number of corona cases are low.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
The study explored the perceived risk and preventive practices for COVID-19 in Bangladesh right before the recent onset COVID-19 second wave in the South Asian region, and included a larger sample size than previous studies.
Unlike most other studies on COVID-19 risk perception that used online surveys, this study administered a face-to-face data collection from both urban and rural settings across all the eight divisions of Bangladesh.
This is the first study in Bangladesh that investigated the effect of perceived risk of COVID-19 on the practice of a range of preventive behaviors, and used an analytical approach to quantify risk perception.
Respondents’ self-reported information on COVID-19 preventive behavior practice is subject to be influenced by recall and desirability bias.
The study was unable to explore the respondents’ frequency and adherence to preventive practices, as well as the influence of psychological factors on preventive behaviors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB) funded this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Ethical Review Committee (IRC) of Centre for Injury Prevention and Research Bangladesh (CIPRB) provided the ethical approval of this study [Ref: ERC/CIPRB/08052020].
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is publicly available.
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/C19_Risk_perception_Preventive_Practice_sav/14661588