Abstract
Background Sensory tricks (SeT) are various maneuvers that can alleviate dystonic contractions and are a characteristic feature of cervical dystonia (CD). The neurophysiology underlying SeT, however, remains largely unknown. Reducing the abnormal cortical facilitation and modulating the abnormal cortical and subcortical oscillatory activity are mechanisms that have been proposed. The supplementary motor area (SMA) and primary sensorimotor cortices are thought to be relevant to this phenomenon.
Objective In the current study, using concurrent EEG recording during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the SMA and primary motor cortex (M1), we aimed at determining the changes in cortical reactivity and oscillatory changes induced by SeT.
Methods We recruited 13 patients with CD who exhibited SeT and equal number of age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Single TMS pulses were delivered over the SMA and M1 either at rest or during SeT. 32-channel EEG was recorded, and TMS-evoked potentials (TEP) were obtained. Further, time-frequency analysis was performed on the induced data. Correlation analysis for significant neurophysiological parameters was done with clinical measures.
Results We found that SeT induced a significant decrease in the amplitude of TEP elicited from M1 stimulation at ∼210-260ms in patients, which correlated with symptom duration. Post hoc analysis of EMG activity in the neck muscles revealed that this effect on TEP was present only in the subset of patients with effective SeT.
Conclusion Our results suggest that SeT reduces cortical reactivity over M1 approximately 200ms after stimulation. This adds support to the idea that reduced cortical facilitation underlies the phenomenon.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the NINDS intramural research program.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Combined NeuroScience Institutional Review Board, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be made available on the NIH repository after the acceptance of manuscript for publication.
