Abstract
Prone position ventilation has been shown to decrease mortality and improve oxygenation in ARDS patients. With best of our knowledge, no study reported physiological effect of prone position in SARS-CoV-2 infected ARDS patients. In this prospective observational study, data of n=20 consecutive laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients with severe ARDS as per Berlin definition was included. Data of 20 patients analyzed with a median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of 56 (45.5-67) y and median (IQR) P/F ratio of 56 (54-66) with a median (IQR) PEEP of 12 (12-14) before initiation of prone position. Seventy-five percentage (95% CI 53.1-88.8) patients were prone responders at 16h prone session and 50 (95% CI 29.9-70.1) % patients were sustained responders. There was a significant decrease in plateau airway pressure (p<0.0001), peak airway pressure (p<0.0001) and driving pressure(p<0.0001) and increase in static compliance (p=0.001), P/F ratio (p<0.0001), PaO2 (p=0.0002)and SpO2 (p=0.0004) at 4h and 16h since initiation of prone session and also after return of supine position. Prone position in SARS-CoV-2 infected severe ARDS patients is associated with improvement in lung compliance and oxygenation in two-third of the patients and persisted in half of the patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institute Ethics Committee, AIIMS, New Delhi
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymous data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.