Abstract
Introduction Underreporting of prior HIV diagnosis and antiretroviral therapy (ART) use based on self-report is well-documented in national surveys. Antiretroviral (ARV) testing has been used to improve survey estimates, by reclassifying respondents with ARVs detected in blood as previously-diagnosed and on ART. Viral load testing, which is more affordable and more routinely available than ARV testing, is also an indicator of ART use. We examined the impact of adjusting estimated knowledge of HIV-positive status and antiretroviral therapy (ART) use based on self-report with biomarkers for antiretroviral (ARV) drug detection and undetectable viral load (UVL).
Methods We reclassified HIV-positive participants aged 15-64 years in the 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey (KAIS) that were unaware of their HIV-positive status by self-report as aware and on ART if either ARVs were detected or viral load was undetectable (<550 copies/mL) on dried blood spots. We compared self-report to adjustments for ARVs measurement, UVL, or both. We calculated measures of accuracy for UVL and UVL & ARV-adjusted versions of knowledge of status and ART use versus ARV-adjusted self-report as a reference standard.
Results Among 235 of 648 HIV-positive respondents with UVL, self-reported status was: 65 unaware (28.7%), 25 aware, not on ART (9.9%) and 145 aware, on ART (61.3%). Treatment coverage among all HIV-positive respondents increased from 31.8% for self-report to 42.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37.4-47.8] based on ARV detection alone, to 42.8% (95% CI 37.9-47.8) when ARV-adjusted, 46.2% (95% CI 41.3-51.1) when UVL-adjusted and 48.8% (95% CI 43.9-53.8) when adjusted for ARV and UVL. Awareness of positive status increased from 46.9% for self-report to 56.2% (95% CI 50.7-61.6) when ARV-adjusted, 57.5% (95% CI 51.9-63.0) when UVL-adjusted, and 59.8% (95% CI 54.2-65.1) when adjusted for ARV and UVL. Sensitivity and specificity of UVL-adjusted known HIV-positive status were 95.8% and 91.3%, and of UVL-adjusted ART use were 93.0% and 88.8% respectively, versus ARV-adjusted self-report.
Conclusions Undetectable viral load may be a useful adjunct or alternative to ARV detection for adjusting knowledge of status and ART use indicators in population-based surveys.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey has been supported by the President?s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the terms of #PS001805, GH000069, and PS001814. The survey was also funded in part by support from the Global Fund, World Bank, and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Attribution of support: The 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey has been supported by the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the terms of #PS001805, GH000069, and PS001814. The survey was also funded in part by support from the Global Fund, World Bank, and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.
A portion of this analysis has been accepted as an abstract to the 2019 International AIDS Society (IAS) conference.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other funding institutions.
Data Availability
Data for KAIS 2012 are available upon request from NASCOP by emailing head@nascop.or.ke, or from the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics by requesting at http://statistics.knbs.or.ke/nada/index.php
