Pooling of direct and indirect evidence from randomized trials, known as mixed treatment
comparisons (MTC), is becoming increasingly common in the clinical literature. MTC allows …

Background The results of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on time-to-event outcomes
that are usually reported are median time to events and Cox Hazard Ratio. These do not …

We set out a generalized linear model framework for the synthesis of data from randomized
controlled trials. A common model is described, taking the form of a linear regression for both …

Published evidence suggests that aspects of trial design lead to biased intervention effect
estimates, but findings from different studies are inconsistent. This study combined data from 7 …

Objective To determine the effect of glucosamine, chondroitin, or the two in combination on
joint pain and on radiological progression of disease in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. …

Objective To generate global and regional estimates for the prevalence and incidence of
herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 and type 2 infection for 2016. Methods To obtain data, we …

Inconsistency can be thought of as a conflict between “direct” evidence on a comparison
between treatments B and C and “indirect” evidence gained from AC and AB trials. Like …

This paper sets out a generalised linear model (GLM) framework for the synthesis of data
from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We describe a common model taking the form of a …

Mixed treatment comparison (MTC) (also called network meta‐analysis) is an extension of
traditional meta‐analysis to allow the simultaneous pooling of data from clinical trials …

Objective To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of direct acting oral
anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation. Design Systematic review, network meta-…