Standard methods for indirect comparisons and network meta-analysis are based on
aggregate data, with the key assumption that there is no difference between the trials in the …

Standard network meta-analysis (NMA) and indirect comparisons combine aggregate data
from multiple studies on treatments of interest, assuming that any effect modifiers are …

Background Various treatments for acne vulgaris exist, but little is known about their comparative
effectiveness in relation to acne severity. Objectives To identify best treatments for mild‐…

Standard network meta‐analysis and indirect comparisons combine aggregate data from
multiple studies on treatments of interest, assuming that any factors that interact with treatment …

ObjectivesIndirect comparisons via a common comparator (anchored comparisons) are
commonly used in health technology assessment. However, common comparators may not be …

Guideline development requires the synthesis of evidence on several treatments of interest,
typically by using network meta-analysis (NMA). Because treatment effects may be …

… David Phillippo reports grants from the Medical Research Council during the conduct of the
study, personal fees from the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry and personal …

Aim To determine how varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and
electronic cigarettes compare with respect to their clinical effectiveness and safety. Method …

A network meta-analysis combines the evidence from existing randomised trials about the
comparative efficacy of multiple treatments. It allows direct and indirect evidence about each …

Network meta-analysis (NMA) pools evidence on multiple treatments to estimate relative
treatment effects. Included studies are typically assessed for risk of bias; however, this provides …