Background The limitations of traditional forms of systematic review in making optimal use of
all forms of evidence are increasingly evident, especially for policy-makers and practitioners…

The selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial when designing clinical trials in order to
compare the effects of different interventions directly. For the findings to influence policy and …

Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising
and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the …

Objective: Qualitative research is increasingly valued as part of the evidence for policy and
practice, but how it should be appraised is contested. Various appraisal methods, including …

The Health Development Agency (www. hda. nhs. uk) is the national authority and information
resource on what works to improve people’s health and reduce health inequalities in …

Much research on the experiences of parents of children with cancer has been conducted
within a discourse of psycho-pathology, or has tended to see parents mostly as a proxy source …

Objective To use a quantitative approach to evaluate the literature for quantity, quality, and
consistency of studies of maternal and infant characteristics in association with breastfeeding …

Feasibility studies are increasingly undertaken in preparation for randomised controlled
trials in order to explore uncertainties and enable trialists to optimise the intervention or the …

Background Despite significant investment in infrastructure many trials continue to face
challenges in recruitment and retention. We argue that insufficient focus has been placed on the …

Background Qualitative research makes an important contribution to our understanding of
health and healthcare. However, qualitative evidence can be difficult to search for and identify, …