A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies

Commun Biol. 2019 Jan 7:2:9. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0261-x. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

This scientometric review of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from 2005 to 2018 (3639 studies; 3508 traits) reveals extraordinary increases in sample sizes, rates of discovery and traits studied. A longitudinal examination shows fluctuating ancestral diversity, still predominantly European Ancestry (88% in 2017) with 72% of discoveries from participants recruited from three countries (US, UK, Iceland). US agencies, primarily NIH, fund 85% and women are less often senior authors. We generate a unique GWAS H-Index and reveal a tight social network of prominent authors and frequently used data sets. We conclude with 10 evidence-based policy recommendations for scientists, research bodies, funders, and editors.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Authorship
  • Capital Financing
  • Female
  • Genetic Research*
  • Genome, Human / genetics
  • Genome-Wide Association Study / trends*
  • Humans
  • Journalism, Medical
  • Male
  • Medical Laboratory Personnel*
  • Research Personnel*
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Whole Genome Sequencing