Which continuous positive airway pressure system is best for the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome?

J Jane Pillow

doi:10.1016/j.clp.2012.06.007

Which continuous positive airway pressure system is best for the preterm infant with respiratory distress syndrome?

Clin Perinatol. 2012 Sep;39(3):483-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.06.007.

Author

J Jane Pillow¹

Affiliation

¹ The Centre for Neonatal Research and Education, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6009. jane.pillow@uwa.edu.au

PMID: 22954264
DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.06.007

Abstract

Various commercial and home-made continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) systems are described in this article. CPAP may be delivered via a range of device-patient interfaces; nasal CPAP is most common, and short binasal prongs impose the least extrinsic load impedance on the infant. The source of pressure generation is categorized as either constant pressure or constant flow. The efficacy of different systems may vary according to whether lung volume recruitment, airway patency, minimization of work of breathing, or central nervous system stimulation are the primary goal of the clinical decision to use CPAP therapy.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review

MeSH terms

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure / adverse effects
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure / instrumentation
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure / methods*
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature*
Lung Volume Measurements
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / physiopathology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / therapy*
Work of Breathing / physiology