skip to main content
10.1145/3195588.3195609acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

GLNet for Target Detection in Millimeter Wave Images

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Millimeter wave imaging can be used to detect objects hidden under clothes and it does no harm to human body, thus it is useful for human body inspection. However, due to limitation of technology, the image is usually noisy, which leads to a great challenge for target detection without human supervision. Based on CNN (convolutional neural network), this paper proposes a Global and Local Network, namely GLNet. The GLNet consists of two convolution neural networks: a global faster and coarse region proposal network (GNet) aiming to extract potential regions containing targets and a local fine network (LNet) for further classification and position calibration. The final results combining the outputs of GNet and LNet shows a better performance than other method. The proposed model achieves 73.5% AP on target detection in our millimeter wave images dataset while keeps 35 frames per seconds for real time detection.

References

  1. Yujiri L, Shoucri M, Moffa P. Passive millimeter wave imaging{J}. IEEE microwave magazine, 2003, 4(3): 39--50Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Yeom S, Lee D S. Multi-Level Segmentation for Concealed Object Detection with Multi-Channel Passive Millimeter Wave Imaging{C}//IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, 2013: 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Haworth C D, De Saint-Pern Y, Clark D, et al. Detection and tracking of multiple metallic objects in millimetre-wave images{J}. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2007, 71(2): 183--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tapia S L, Molina R, de la Blanca N P. Detection and localization of objects in Passive Millimeter Wave Images{C}//Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2016 24th European. IEEE, 2016: 2101--2105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Viola P, Jones M. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features{C}//Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, 2001, 1: I--I.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xiao Z, Lu X, Yan J, et al. Automatic detection of concealed pistols using passive millimeter wave imaging{C}//Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2015: 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, et al. Going deeper with convolutions{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2015: 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016: 770--778.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Girshick R. Fast r-cnn{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2015: 1440--1448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, et al. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks{J}. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6):1137--1149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, et al. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2014: 580--587 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Uijlings J R R, Van De Sande K E A, Gevers T, et al. Selective search for object recognition{J}. International journal of computer vision, 2013, 104(2): 154--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, et al. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016: 779--788.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Redmon J, Farhadi A. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger {C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2017: 6517--6525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, et al. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector{C}//European conference on computer vision. Springer, Cham, 2016: 21--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hosang J, Benenson R, Dollár P, et al. What makes for effective detection proposals?{J}. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2016, 38(4): 814--830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zitnick C L, Dollár P. Edge boxes: Locating object proposals from edges{C}//European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 2014: 391--405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift{C}//International Conference on Machine Learning. 2015: 448--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, et al. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2017: 2980--2988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shrivastava A, Gupta A, Girshick R. Training region-based object detectors with online hard example mining{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016: 761--769.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cai Z, Fan Q, Feris R S, et al. A unified multi-scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection{C}//European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer International Publishing, 2016: 354--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kong T, Yao A, Chen Y, et al. Hypernet: Towards accurate region proposal generation and joint object detection{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016: 845--853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Bell S, Lawrence Zitnick C, Bala K, et al. Inside-outside net: Detecting objects in context with skip pooling and recurrent neural networks{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016: 2874--2883.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. GLNet for Target Detection in Millimeter Wave Images

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICMIP '18: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing
      March 2018
      125 pages
      ISBN:9781450364683
      DOI:10.1145/3195588

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 March 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader