skip to main content
10.1145/2910896.2910909acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Academic publishers claim that they add value to scholarly communications by coordinating reviews and contributing and enhancing text during publication. These contributions come at a considerable cost: U.S. academic libraries paid $1.7 billion for serial subscriptions in 2008 alone. Library budgets, in contrast, are flat and not able to keep pace with serial price inflation. We have investigated the publishers' value proposition by conducting a comparative study of pre-print papers and their final published counterparts. This comparison had two working assumptions: 1) if the publishers' argument is valid, the text of a pre-print paper should vary measurably from its corresponding final published version, and 2) by applying standard similarity measures, we should be able to detect and quantify such differences. Our analysis revealed that the text contents of the scientific papers generally changed very little from their pre-print to final published versions. These findings contribute empirical indicators to discussions of the added value of commercial publishers and therefore should influence libraries' economic decisions regarding access to scholarly publications.

References

  1. B.-C. Björk. Have the "mega-journals" reached the limits to growth? PeerJ, 3:e981, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B.-C. Björk, P. Welling, M. Laakso, P. Majlender, T. Hedlund, and G. Guðnason. Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6):e11273, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. L. Bornmann and R. Mutz. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Jaccard. Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura. Impr. Corbaz, 1901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. R. Jamali and M. Nabavi. Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics, 105(3):1635--1651, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. V. I. Levenshtein. Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8):707--710, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Mabe. (Electronic) Journal Publishing. The E-Resource Management Handbook, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Office of Management and Budget (U.S.). Fiscal Year 2014 Analytical Perspectives: Budget of the U.S. Government. Office of Management and Budget, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Pang-Ning, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar. Introduction to Data Mining. Pearson Addison Wesley, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. F. Porter. An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 14(3):130--137, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Sørensen. A Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant Sociology Based on Similarity of Species and its Application to Analyses of the Vegetation on Danish Commons. Biol. Skr., 5:1--34, 1948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. University of California. Accountability Report 2015. http://accountability.universityofcalifornia.edu/2015/chapters/chapter-9.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Ware and M. Wabe. The STM Report - An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Published Scientific Journal Articles to Their Pre-print Versions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      JCDL '16: Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
      June 2016
      316 pages
      ISBN:9781450342292
      DOI:10.1145/2910896

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      JCDL '16 Paper Acceptance Rate15of52submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader