Skip to main content
Log in

Bringing the Real World to Psychometric Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Literacy Assessments with Black, Latina, and Arab Women in Real-World Settings

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research describes the development and evaluation of a new scale for assessing functional cervical cancer health literacy, the Cervical Cancer Literacy Assessment Tool (C-CLAT). In phase 1, 35 items in English, Spanish, and Arabic for C-CLAT were generated, taking into account three content domains—Awareness, Knowledge, and Prevention/Control. After content validation, 24 items were retained for psychometric evaluation. In phase 2, the 24-item C-CLAT was evaluated in three racial/ethnic populations of urban women (N = 543). Psychometric methods included item analysis, multifactor item response theory modeling, and concurrent correlations. The final C-CLAT consisted of 16 items, with an internal consistency reliability of 0.72. C-CLAT reliabilities in Black, Latina, and Arab women were 0.73, 0.76, and 0.60, respectively. The rank order correlations of item difficulties across racial/ethnic groups was high (r's = 0.97 to 0.98). The C-CLAT was positively related to educational level, and Arab women scored significantly higher than the Black and Latina participants. This study presents a psychometrically sound instrument that measures health literacy related to cervical cancer. The C-CLAT is a tool that can be orally administered by a lay person and used in a community-based health promotion intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2011) Global cancer facts and figures, 2nd edn. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aguirre AC, Ebrahim N, Shea JA (2005) Performance of the English and Spanish S-TOFHLA among publicly insured Medicaid and Medicare patients. Patient Educ Couns 56:332–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen L, Manion L (1980) Rsearch methods in education. Croom Helm, Dover

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis TC, Michielutte R, Askov EN, Williams MV, Weiss BD (1998) Practical assessment of adult literacy in health care. Health Educ Behav 25:613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW et al (1993) Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med 25

  6. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gazmararian JA, Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Scott TL, Green DC et al (1999) Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA 281:545–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C (2012) National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health 102:1274–1281

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Cancer Institute (2006) Americans unclear on when to get cancer screening tests. NCI Cancer Bull 3:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, Committee on Health Literacy, Board of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, & Institute of Medicine (2004) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paasche-Orlow MK, Wolf MS (2010) Promoting health literacy research to reduce health disparities. J Health Commun 15:34–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR (1995) The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med 10:537–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pleasant A, Mckinney J, Rikard RV (2011) Health literacy measurement: a proposed research agenda. J Health Commun 16:11–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ratzan SC, Parker RM (2000) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rivera-Vasquez O, Mabiso A, Hammad A, Williams KP (2009) A community-based approach to translating and testing cancer literacy assessment tools. J Cancer Educ 24

  16. Wasserman JD, Bracken BA (2003) Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures. In: Handbook of Psychology. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams KP (2007) Kin keeper: a family-focused cancer prevention model for African-American women. J Hum Behav Soc Environ 15:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams KP, Mullan PB, Fletcher FE (2007) Working with African American women to develop a cancer literacy assessment tool. J Cancer Educ 22:241–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams KP, Templin TN, Hines RD (2013) Answering the call: a tool that measures functional breast cancer literacy. J Health Commun. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.778367

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Nursing Research R21NR010366 and National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities P30AG15281.

Conflict of Interest

We confirm that all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Patricia Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, K.P., Templin, T.N. Bringing the Real World to Psychometric Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Literacy Assessments with Black, Latina, and Arab Women in Real-World Settings. J Canc Educ 28, 738–743 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0549-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0549-y

Keywords

Navigation