Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genes as instruments for studying risk behavior effects: an application to maternal smoking and orofacial clefts

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses instrumental variable (IV) models with genetic instruments to assess the effects of maternal smoking on the child’s risk of orofacial clefts (OFC), a common birth defect. The study uses genotypic variants in neurotransmitter and detoxification genes relateded to smoking as instruments for cigarette smoking before and during pregnancy. Conditional maximum likelihood and two-stage IV probit models are used to estimate the IV model. The data are from a population-level sample of affected and unaffected children in Norway. The selected genetic instruments generally fit the IV assumptions but may be considered “weak” in predicting cigarette smoking. We find that smoking before and during pregnancy increases OFC risk substantially under the IV model (by about 4–5 times at the sample average smoking rate). This effect is greater than that found with classical analytic models. This may be because the usual models are not able to consider self-selection into smoking based on unobserved confounders, or it may to some degree reflect limitations of the instruments. Inference based on weak-instrument robust confidence bounds is consistent with standard inference. Genetic instruments may provide a valuable approach to estimate the “causal” effects of risk behaviors with genetic-predisposing factors (such as smoking) on health and socioeconomic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The variant rs1051730 is also related to quitting and intensity of smoking during pregnancy (Freathy et al. 2009).

  2. Cleft lip only and cleft lip with palate are commonly grouped in the literature given their similarities in development and recurrence risks.

  3. The specific questions on smoking and other survey questions can be found on http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/atniehs/labs/epi/studies/ncl/question.cfm.). We do not have direct data on changes in smoking amounts within these periods, but these may be partly reflected in the responses to average smoking intensity as described above. We focus on estimating the overall average effects of cigarette quantity per day for the days when the women smoked in these periods.

  4. About 27% of the mothers in the study sample reported that the pregnancy was unplanned.

  5. These SNPs pass the Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) test at P = 0.34–0.9. The HWE test evaluates whether the genotypic proportions at each SNP express deviations from an equilibrium/constant distribution due to non-random mating and other factors that may result in such deviations. Higher P values suggest more confidence in not rejecting the random mating hypothesis and in lack of deviation from the HWE equilibrium.

  6. We include one indicator because we find that the effects of the two indicators for each SNP are in the same direction and generally insignificant from each other, except for SNP rs1435252, for which these two effects are significantly different at P < 0.05. Therefore, we keep two indicators for SNP rs1435252. Another advantage of reducing the number of instruments is that in the presence of “weak instruments”, which is the case for these instruments as described below, the bias in the IV estimate increases with the number of instruments (Hahn and Hausman 2003).

  7. The Norway sample had also been genotyped independently of the CIDR project for several other variants in GABAB2 as well as DDC, and CHRNA4, which are genes that have also been implicated in smoking behaviors (Ma et al. 2005; (Li et al. 2005). However, these variants had insignificant effects on smoking during the first pregnancy trimester. Supplementary Table S2 reports the results for the relationship between these additional variants and first trimester smoking.

  8. We evaluate the over-identification restrictions based on Newey’s (1987) minimum chi-square distance estimator of the IV probit model (Newey 1987).

  9. Some studies report that maternal alcohol consumption, mainly excessive consumption, increases the risk of OFC (e.g. (Grewal et al. 2008; Romitti et al. 1999). However, other studies report insignificant (e.g. (Bille et al. 2007; Meyer et al. 2003). Some studies also report that maternal obesity increases OFC risk (e.g. (Stothard et al. 2009; Villamor et al. 2008) but others do not find significant effects (Shaw et al. 2000). Food insecurity may also increase cleft palate risk (Carmichael et al. 2007). Low socioeconomic resources may increase OFC risk (Clark et al. 2003; Durning et al. (2007); Yang et al. 2008). We include pregnancy intendedness as it reflects maternal preferences for risk taking and may proxy for some unobserved confounders.

  10. This approach averages the predicted probabilities from Eq. 3 across all observations i (so that the predicted effects are averaged across ei).

  11. In models that include only smoking and no covariates, the OR as defined in Eq. 4 that is obtained from a probit function is identical to that from a logistic function, which is the standard regression model used in case–control or case–cohort designs. For example, both logistic regression and probit regression of OFC on smoking participation (yes/no) in the first trimester provide an OR estimate of 1.54. When the model includes additional covariates, the odds ratio from the probit model is expected to differ slightly from the logistic regression OR, because unlike the logistic regression OR, the probit OR is dependent on the covariate values. However, the ORs from the two models are still expected to be very close to each other. For example, when adding the covariates described above into the model, the OR for first trimester smoking participation is 1.379 and 1.370 in the probit and logistic regressions, respectively.

  12. For the bootstraps, we set the maximum number of iterations for each IV-probit CML regression to 10. Using the full study sample, The CML model converged at five iterations with cigarettes before pregnancy and six iterations for first trimester cigarettes.

  13. The “threshold” for weak instruments varies with several parameters including sample size, number of instruments, and other parameters. However, F-statistics below 10 are generally considered to suggest weak-instruments in linear models (Staiger and Stock 1997). There are no rules of thumb for instrument strengths in the CML model, but the instruments may also be weak in that model.

  14. The weak-instrument robust confidence bounds are only available for the Newey’s IV probit estimator and are not available for the other IV probit models (CML IV-Probit or the two-stage IV probit with residual substitution).

  15. Table S3 in the Supplementary Material reports the full CML regression results for the OFC functions in (Eq. 1). Table S4 reports the full regression results for the cigarette functions in the CML model (Eq. 2).

  16. We interpret the smoking effects using odds ratios based on the estimated cigarette number regression coefficients by simulating the effects of smoking the average number of cigarettes among smokers relative to not smoking. The average cigarette numbers (9 cigarettes per day before pregnancy and 6 cigarettes per day during the first trimester) used in this simulation are conditional on being a smoker. Note that these effects may not be directly compared to odds ratios for smoking participation (yes/no) effects. One reason is that cigarette number is likely to be measured with some error, which attenuates the effect towards zero. We do not use binary smoking status or categorical indicators for cigarette number because of the limited instrument effects on these measures. Therefore, these effects should not be contrasted with odds ratio effects reported in previous studies using this sample (Lie et al. 2008). For instance, adjusting for the model covariates described above, we estimate an odds ratio of any smoking during the first trimester of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.02; 1.88) for OFC and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.1, 2.17) for cleft lip without palate.

  17. Table S5 in the Supplementary Material reports the full regression results for the OFC function excluding cleft palate only. Table S6 reports the full regression results for the cigarette function.

  18. The regression coefficients cannot be directly compared between these models as they require transformation to obtain the variable effects.

  19. Recent studies have provided several additional candidates for smoking, with confirmed associations for the gene encoding cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha 5 (CHRNA5 on chr 15q24) in multiple, independent studies (Hung et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2010; Saccone et al. (2010); Thorgeirsson et al. 2008, 2010). Additional susceptibility loci have been identified through recent genome-wide association studies, including acetylcholine receptor genes CHRNB3 and CHRNA6 on chr 8p11, egl nine homolog 2 (EGLN2) on chr 9q13, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) on chr 11p13, CHRNA3 on chr 15q24, and cytochrome P450 genes CYP2A6 and CYP2B6 on chr 19q13 (2010; McKay et al. 2008; Thorgeirsson et al. 2010).

  20. Unlike for the local average treatment effect of two stage least squares (2SLS), this is not a strict but rather an intuitive interpretation of the effects in the CML and other IV probit models.

References

  • Agrawal, A., Pergadia, M.L., Saccone, S.F., et al.: Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor genes and nicotine dependence: evidence for association from a case–control study. Addiction 103(6), 1027–1038 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D.W.K., Moreira, M.J., Stock, J.H.: Optimal two-sided invariant similar tests for instrumental variables regression. Econometrica 74(3), 715–752 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J.D., Imbens, G.W., Rubin, D.B.: Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91(434), 444–455 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, C.F.W., Stillman, V., Schaffer, S., M. E. OVERID: Stata Module to Calculate Tests of Overidentifying Restrictions after ivreg, ivreg2, ivprobit, ivtobit, reg3. Statistical Software Components S396902. Department of Economics, Boston College, Boston (2007)

  • Berrettini, W., Yuan, X., Tozzi, F., et al.: Alpha-5/alpha-3 nicotinic receptor subunit alleles increase risk for heavy smoking. Mol Psychiatry 13(4), 368–373 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beuten, J., Ma, J.Z., Payne, T.J., Dupont, R.T., Crews, K.M., Somes, G., Williams, N.J., Elston, R.C., Li, M.D.: Single- and multilocus allelic variants within the GABA(B) receptor subunit 2 (GABAB2) gene are significantly associated with nicotine dependence. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76(5), 6 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, C., Olsen, J., Vach, W., et al.: Oral clefts and life style factors—a case-cohort study based on prospective Danish data. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 22(3), 173–181 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, C., Winther, J.F., Bautz, A., et al.: Cancer risk in persons with oral cleft—a population-based study of 8,093 cases. Am. J. Epidemiol. 161(11), 1047–1055 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boulet, S.L., Grosse, S.D., Honein, M.A., et al.: Children with orofacial clefts: health-care use and costs among a privately insured population. Public Health Rep. 124(3), 447–453 (2009)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, N., Gu, F., Chatterjee, N., et al.: Genome-wide and candidate gene association study of cigarette smoking behaviors. PLoS One 4(2), e4653 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carmelli, D., Swan, G.E., Robinette, D., et al.: Genetic influence on smoking—a study of male twins. N. Engl. J. Med. 327(12), 829–833 (1992)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, S. L., Shaw, G. M., Ma C. et al.: Maternal corticosteroid use and orofacial clefts. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 197(6), 585.e1–85.e7 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C.H., Meyer, R., Daniels, J.: Health care expenditures among Medicaid enrolled children with and without orofacial clefts in North Carolina, 1995–2002. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 82(11), 785–794 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects—United States, 1999–2001. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 54(51), 1301–1305 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K.: The 20th century Danish facial cleft population—epidemiological and genetic-epidemiological studies. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 36(2), 96–104 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K., Juel, K., Herskind, A.M., et al.: Long term follow up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth. BMJ 328(7453), 1405 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, K., Mortensen, P.B.: Facial clefting and psychiatric diseases: a follow-up of the Danish 1936–1987 Facial Cleft cohort. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J 39(4), 392–396 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K.C., Kowalski, C.P., Kim, H.M., et al.: Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and the risk of having a child with cleft lip/palate. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105(2), 485–491 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.D., Mossey, P.A., Sharp, L., et al.: Socioeconomic status and orofacial clefts in Scotland, 1989 to 1998. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 40(5), 481–485 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D.E., Ferry, L., Bradshaw-Robinson, S., Burchette, R., Chiu, C., Muhleman, D.: The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene: a genetic risk factor in smoking. Pharmacogenetics 6(1), 73–79 (1996)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comings, D.E., Wu, S., Gonzalez, N., et al.: Cholecystokinin (CCK) gene as a possible risk factor for smoking: a replication in two independent samples. Mol. Genet. Metab. 73(4), 349–353 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dina, C., Meyre, D., Gallina, S., et al.: Variation in FTO contributes to childhood obesity and severe adult obesity. Nat. Genet. 39(6), 724–726 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W., Lehrer, S.F., Rosenquist, J.N., et al.: The impact of poor health on academic performance: new evidence using genetic markers. Journal of Health Economics 28(3), 578–597 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durning, P.C.I., Morgan, M.Z., Lester, N.J.: The relationship between orofacial clefts and material deprivation in wales. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 44(2), 5 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenberg, H.J., Foroud, T.: The genetics of alcoholism: identifying specific genes through family studies. Addict Biol. 11(3–4), 386–396 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W.N., Ringel, J.S.: Can higher cigarette taxes improve birth outcomes? J. Public Econ. 72(1), 135–154 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finaly, K., Magnusson, L.M.: Implementing weak-instrument robust tests for a general class of instrumental-variables models. Stata J. 9(3), 398–421 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flegal, K.M., Carroll, M.D., Ogden, C.L., et al.: Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303(3), 235–241 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J.M., Lehrer, S.F.: The effects of adolescent health on educational outcomes: causal evidence using genetic lotteries between siblings. Forum Health Econ. Policy 12(2) (2009a)

  • Fletcher, J.M., Lehrer, S.F.: Using genetic lotteries within families to examine the causal impact of poor health on academic achievement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 15148 (2009b)

  • Frayling, T.M., Timpson, N.J., Weedon, M.N., et al.: A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science 316(5826), 889–894 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freathy, R.M., Ring, S.M., Shields, B. et al.: A common genetic variant in the 15q24 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene cluster (CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4) is associated with a reduced ability of women to quit smoking in pregnancy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 2922–2927 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, J., Carmichael, S.L., Ma, C., et al.: Maternal periconceptional smoking and alcohol consumption and risk for select congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 82(7), 519–526 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., Joyce, T.J.: Unobservables, pregnancy resolutions, and birth weight production functions in New York City. J. Polit. Econ. 98(5), 983 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, J., Hausman, J.: Weak instruments: diagnosis and cures in empirical econometrics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(2), 118–125 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harville, E.W., Wilcox, A.J., Lie, R.T., et al.: Epidemiology of cleft palate alone and cleft palate with accompanying defects. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 22(6), 389–395 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harville, E.W., Wilcox, A.J., Lie, R.T., et al.: Cleft lip and palate versus cleft lip only: are they distinct defects? Am. J. Epidemiol. 162(5), 448–453 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A.C., Martin, N.G.: Genetic models for the natural history of smoking: evidence for a genetic influence on smoking persistence. Addict. Behav. 18(1), 19–34 (1993)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J.J.: Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153–161 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honein, M.A., Rasmussen, S.A., Reefhuis, J., et al.: Maternal smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure and the risk of orofacial clefts. Epidemiology 18(2), 226–233 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, R.J., McKay, J.D., Gaborieau, V., et al.: A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature 452(7187), 633–637 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jugessur, A., Farlie, P.G., Kilpatrick, N.: The genetics of isolated orofacial clefts: from genotypes to subphenotypes. Oral Dis. 15(7), 437–453 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, M.J., Gomez-Farias, M., Mulinare, J.: Does maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy cause cleft lip and palate in offspring? Am. J. Dis. Child. 143(3), 333–337 (1989)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, D.A., Harbord, R.M., Sterne, J.A., et al.: Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat. Med. 27(8), 1133–1163 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L.-F.: Amemiya’s generalized least squares and tests of overidentification in simultaneous equation models with qualitative or limited dependent variables. Econ. Rev. 11(3), 319–328 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Caporaso, N.E., Bush, A., et al.: Tryptophan hydroxylase gene variant and smoking behavior. Am. J. Med. Genet. 105(6), 518–520 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lessov, C.N., Martin, N.G., Statham, D.J., et al.: Defining nicotine dependence for genetic research: evidence from Australian twins. Psychol. Med. 34(5), 865–879 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M.D.: The genetics of nicotine dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 8(2), 158–164 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M.D., Beuten, J., Ma, J.Z., et al.: Ethnic- and gender-specific association of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha4 subunit gene (CHRNA4) with nicotine dependence. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(9), 1211–1219 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M.D., Mangold, J.E., Seneviratne, C., et al.: Association and interaction analyses of GABBR1 and GABBR2 with nicotine dependence in European- and African-American populations. PLoS One 4(9), e7055 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lidral, A.C., Moreno, L.M.: Progress toward discerning the genetics of cleft lip. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 17(6), 731–739 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidral, A.C., Moreno, L.M., Bullard, S.A.: Genetic factors and orofacial clefting. Semin Orthod 14(2), 103–114 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lie, R.T., Wilcox, A.J., Taylor, J., et al.: Maternal smoking and oral clefts: the role of detoxification pathway genes. Epidemiology 19(4), 606–615 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieff, S., Olshan, A.F., Werler, M., et al.: Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and risk of oral clefts in newborns. Am. J. Epidemiol. 150(7), 683–694 (1999)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, D.S., Evans, W.N.: Estimating the impact of large cigarette tax hikes: the case of maternal smoking and infant birth weight. J. Hum. Resour. 40(2), 373–392 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J., Cardy, A., Arslan, M.T., et al.: Smoking and orofacial clefts: a United Kingdom-based case–control study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 41(4), 381–386 (2004a)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J., Cardy, A., Munger, R.G.: Tobacco smoking and oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Bull. World Health Organ. 82(3), 213–218 (2004b)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J.Z., Tozzi, F., Waterworth, D.M., et al.: Meta-analysis and imputation refines the association of 15q25 with smoking quantity. Nat. Genet. 42(5), 436–440 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loos, R.J.C.M., Lindgren, S., Li, E., et al.: Common variants near MC4R are associated with fat mass, weight and risk of obesity. Nat. Genet. 40(6), 768–775 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Kranzler, H.R., Zuo, L., et al.: Diplotype trend regression analysis of the ADH gene cluster and the ALDH2 gene: multiple significant associations with alcohol dependence. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78(6), 973–987 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J.Z., Beuten, J., Payne, T.J., et al.: Haplotype analysis indicates an association between the DOPA decarboxylase (DDC) gene and nicotine dependence. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(12), 1691–1698 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLehose, R.F., Olshan, A.F., Herring, A.H., et al.: Bayesian methods for correcting misclassification: an example from birth defects epidemiology. Epidemiology 20(1), 27–35 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, H.H., Sullivan, P.F., Bulik, C.M., et al.: A twin study of genetic and environmental influences on tobacco initiation, regular tobacco use and nicotine dependence. Psychol. Med. 34(7), 1251–1261 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J.D., Hung, R.J., Gaborieau, V., et al.: Lung cancer susceptibility locus at 5p15.33. Nat. Genet. 40(12), 1404–1406 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, E.F., Walton, R.T., Yudkin, P., et al.: Association between polymorphisms in dopamine metabolic enzymes and tobacco consumption in smokers. Pharmacogenetics 10(6), 483–491 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.A., Werler, M.M., Hayes, C., et al.: Low maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy and oral clefts in offspring: the Slone Birth Defects Study. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 67(7), 509–514 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mossey, P.A., Little, J., Munger, R.G., et al.: Cleft lip and palate. Lancet 374(9703), 1773–1785 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahy, J.: Instrumental-variable estimation of count data models: applications to models of cigarette smoking behavior. Rev. Econ. Stat. 79(4), 586–593 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W.K.: Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables. J. Econ. 36(3), 231–250 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • NIEHS: Norway Facial Cleft Study (NCL) (2009)

  • Noble, E.P., St. Jeor, S.T., Ritchie, T., et al.: D2 dopamine receptor gene and cigarette smoking: a reward gene? Med. Hypotheses 42(4), 257–260 (1994)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Permutt, T., Hebel, J.R.: Simultaneous-equation estimation in a clinical trial of the effect of smoking on birth weight. Biometrics 45(2), 619–622 (1989)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pianezza, M.L., Sellers, E.M., Tyndale, R.F.: Nicotine metabolism defect reduces smoking. Nature 393(6687), 750 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, L., Kraft, P., Hunter, D.J., et al.: The common obesity variant near MC4R gene is associated with higher intakes of total energy and dietary fat, weight change and diabetes risk in women. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17(22), 3502–3508 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, D., Vuong, Q.H.: Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. J. Econ. 39(3), 347–366 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Romitti, P.A., Lidral, A.C., Munger, R.G., et al.: Candidate genes for nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate and maternal cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption: evaluation of genotype-environment interactions from a population-based case–control study of orofacial clefts. Teratology 59(1), 39–50 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M., Schultz, T.P.: Estimating a household production function: heterogeneity, the demand for health inputs, and their effects on birth weight. J. Polit. Econ. 91(5), 723–746 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarikoski, S.T., Sata, F., Husgafvel-Pursiainen, K., et al.: CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer genotype as a potential modifier of smoking behaviour. Pharmacogenetics 10(1), 5–10 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saccone, N.L., Culverhouse, R.C., Schwantes-An, T.H., et al.: Multiple independent loci at chromosome 15q25.1 affect smoking quantity: a meta-analysis and comparison with lung cancer and COPD. PLoS Genet 6(8) (2010)

  • Sellers, E.M., Kaplan, H.L., Tyndale, R.F.: Inhibition of cytochrome P450 2A6 increases nicotine’s oral bioavailability and decreases smoking. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 68(1), 35–43 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, G., Todoroff, K., Schaffer, D.M., Selvin, S.: Maternal height and prepregnancy body mass index as risk factors for selected congenital anomalies. Paediatr. Perinatal Epidemiol. 14(3), 234–239 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, G.M., Carmichael, S.L., Vollset, S.E., et al.: Mid-pregnancy cotinine and risks of orofacial clefts and neural tube defects. J. Pediatr. 154(1), 17–19 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, M., Wehby, G.L., Murray, J.C.: Review on genetic variants and maternal smoking in the etiology of oral clefts and other birth defects. Birth Defects Res. (Part C). 84(1), 16–29 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.D., Lawlor, D.A., Harbord, R., et al.: Clustered environments and randomized genes: a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology. PLoS Med 4(12), e352 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, G.: Formation of the primary palate. In: Wyszynski DF (ed) Cleft Lip and Palate: From Origin to Treatment, pp 5–13, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

  • Spitz, M.R., Shi, H., Yang, F., et al.: Case–control study of the D2 dopamine receptor gene and smoking status in lung cancer patients. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 90(5), 358–363 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, D., Stock, J.H.: Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3), 557–586 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stothard, K.J., Tennant, P.W., Bell, R., et al.: Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301(6), 636–650 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P.F., Jiang, Y., Neale, M.C., Kendler, K.S., Straub, R.E.: Association of the tryptophan hydroxylase gene with smoking initiation but not progression to nicotine dependence. Am. J. Med. Genet. 105(5):479–484 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgeirsson, T.E., Geller, F., Sulem, P., et al.: A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature 452(7187), 638–642 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorgeirsson, T.E., Gudbjartsson, D.F., Surakka, I., et al.: Sequence variants at CHRNB3-CHRNA6 and CYP2A6 affect smoking behavior. Nat. Genet. 42(5), 448–453 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstrup, J.S., Nordestgaard, B.G., Rasmussen, S., et al.: Alcoholism and alcohol drinking habits predicted from alcohol dehydrogenase genes. Pharmacogenomics J. 8(3), 220–227 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyndale, R.: Genetics of alcohol and tobacco use in humans. Ann. Med. 35(2), 94–122 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villamor, E., Sparen, P., Cnattingius, S.: Risk of oral clefts in relation to prepregnancy weight change and interpregnancy interval. Am. J. Epidemiol. 167(11), 1305–1311 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S., Smith, G. D., Lawlor, D.A., Propper, C., Windmeijer, F.: Genetic markers as instrumental variables: an application to child fat mass and academic achievement. The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, UK 2010/06 (2010)

  • Wehby, G.L., Almind-Pedersen, D., Murray, J.C., Christensen, K.: “The long-term effects of birth defects on hospital use—the case of oral clefts.” University of Iowa, Department of Health Management and Policy (2011)

  • Wehby, G.L., Cassell, C.H.: The impact of orofacial clefts on quality of life and healthcare use and costs. Oral Dis. 16(1), 3–10 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehby, G.L., Murray, J.C., Castilla, E.E., et al.: Prenatal care demand and its effects on birth outcomes by birth defect status in Argentina. Econ Hum Biol 7(1), 84–95 (2009a)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehby, G.L., Murray, J.C., Castilla, E.E., et al.: Quantile effects of prenatal care utilization on birth weight in Argentina. Health Econ. 18(11), 1307–1321 (2009b)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehby, G.L., Ohsfeldt, R.L., Murray, J.C.: Health professionals’ assessment of health-related quality of life values for oral clefting by age using a visual analogue scale method. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 43(4), 383–391 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehby, G.L., Ohsfeldt, R.L., Murray, J.C.: ‘Mendelian randomization’ equals instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments. Stat. Med. 27(15):2745–2749 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Werler, M.M., Lammer, E.J., Rosenberg, L., et al.: Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy in relation to oral clefts. Am. J. Epidemiol. 132(5), 926–932 (1990)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, C.J., Speliotes E.K., Loos, R.J., et al. (2009). Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nat. Genet. 41(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyszynski, D.F., Duffy, D.L., Beaty, T.H.: Maternal cigarette smoking and oral clefts: a meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 34(3), 206–210 (1997)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Carmichael, S.L., Canfield, M., et al.: Socioeconomic status in relation to selected birth defects in a large multicentered US case–control study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 167(2), 145–154 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Panhuysen, C., Kranzler, H.R., et al.: Intronic variants in the dopa decarboxylase (DDC) gene are associated with smoking behavior in European-Americans and African-Americans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15(14), 2192–2199 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIH/NIDCR grant 1 R03 DE018394 and in part by NIH/NIDCR grant 1 R01 DE020895-01 and the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institutes of Environmental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George L. Wehby.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wehby, G.L., Jugessur, A., Murray, J.C. et al. Genes as instruments for studying risk behavior effects: an application to maternal smoking and orofacial clefts. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 11, 54–78 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-011-0071-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-011-0071-9

Keywords

Navigation