Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glomerulonephritis with crescents among adult Saudi patients outcome and its predictors

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical and pathological features and outcome of glomerulonephritis with crescents among adult patients. This is a retrospective study of all cases of crescentic GN seen over a 9-year period (2001–2010). Histological features were assessed, and renal function at baseline and end of follow-up period was recorded. Results among different etiological groups at baseline and end of follow-up period were compared. The mean age in the whole group was 35.6 years (16.2), with the lowest mean in the lupus nephritis (LN) group [27.7 years (9.9)] and the highest in the pauciimmune glomerulonephritis (PIGN) group (P = 0.001). There were 72 cases enrolled in the study. LN accounted for 49.3% of the cases, PIGN for 26.5%, other immune complex glomerulonephritis (ICGN) for 19% and post-infectious GN accounted for 6.3% The majority (85.7%) of the patients had renal impairment at presentation (mean serum creatinine levels were 247 (85) μmol/l, 412 (75) μmol/l and 230 (141) μmol/l in LN, PICN and ICGN, respectively (P = 0.05). Women accounted for 85.3, 76.5 and 36.2% of the patients in LN, PICN and ICGN, respectively (P = 0.025). By the end of the follow-up period of 26 (22.9) months, 25.8% of the patients were requiring dialysis (16.70% in the LN group, 50% in PIGN and 25% in ICGN (P = 0.05) and 21.7% had nephrotic range proteinuria (16.7, 1 and 33.3%, respectively (P = 0.4). Using logistic multivariate analysis, the only independent factors found to predict need for dialysis of prognosis were percent of sclerosed glomeruli (P = 0.05) and presence of ATN (P = 0.028). Baseline proteinuria or SCr, gender and number of glomeruli with crescents, on the other hand, did not impact prognosis. Using linear regression multivariate analysis, SCr, protein excretion and activity score at biopsy did not influence change in SCr or final SCr during the follow-up period. Using ANOVA to compare the groups of LN, PIGN and ICGN), we found significant differences only in gender between LN and ICGN (P = 0.035), in percent glomerular global sclerosis (between LN and PIGN (P = 0.007) and between LN and ICGN (P = 0.012) and in age (between LN and PIGN (P = 0.006). Almost half of our patients with CrGN were due to LN which is higher than that reported by others where PIGN was the more prevalent etiology. Patients with PICN were older and had worse prognosis. This could be explained by the higher number of globally sclerosed glomeruli in the PIGN group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Koyama A, Yamagata K, Makino H, Arimura Y, Wada T, Nitta K et al (2009) A nationwide survey of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in Japan: etiology, prognosis and treatment diversity. Clin Exp Nephro 13:633–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jennette JC (2003) Rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 63:1164–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Juan M (2008) López-Gómez Francisco Rivera, renal biopsy findings in acute renal failure in the Cohort of patients in the Spanish registry of glomerulonephritis. CJASN 3(3):674–681

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin W, Chen M, Cui Z, Zhao M-H (2010) The immunopathological spectrum of crescentic glomerulonephritis: a survey of 106 patients in a single Chinese center. Nephron Clin Pract 116:c65–c74. doi:10.1159/000314665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu F, Tan Y, Liu G, Wang S-X, Zou W-Z, Zhao M-H (2009) Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with crescentic lupus nephritis Crescentic lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 76:307–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qari FA (2002) Clinical pattern of systemic lupus erythematosus in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 23(10):1247–1250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heller T, Ahmed M, Siddiqqi A, Wallrauch C, Bahlas S (2007) Systemic lupus erythematosus in Saudi Arabia: morbidity and mortality in a multiethnic population. Lupus 16:908–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Arfaj AS, Al-Balla SR, Al-Dalaan AN, Al-Saleh SS, Bahabri SA, Mousa MM, Sekeit MA (2002) Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 23:87–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cervera R, Font J, Shoenfeld Y (2006) European working party on systemic lupus erythematosus: a 15-year report. Autoimmun Rev 5:549–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huraib S, Al Khader A, Shaheen FA et al (2000) The spectrum of glomerulonephritis in Saudi Arabia: the results of the Saudi registry. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 11:434–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitwalli AH (2000) Glomerulonephritis in Saudi Arabia: a review Saudi. J Kidney Dis Transpl 11:567–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF et al (1982) The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 25:1271–1277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM (2004) International society of nephrology working group on the classification of lupus nephritis; renal pathology society working group on the classification of lupus nephritis. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int 65:521–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollak VE, Pirani CL, Schwartz FD (1964) The natural history of the renal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Lab Clin Med 63:537–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Austin HA, Muenz LR, Joyce KM et al (1984) Diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: identification of specific pathologic features affecting renal outcome. Kidney Int 25:689–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al Durahim H, Al Ghamdi G, Al Seraya A, Al Sayyari A. Predictors of mortality and end stage renal disease in lupus nephritis. Personal Communication

  17. Zheng Tang Z, Wang Z, Zhang H, Xin Hu W, Zeng C, Chen H (2009) Clinical features and renal outcome in lupus patients with diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis. Rheumatol Int 30:45–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Booth AD, Almond MK, Burns A, Ellis P, Gaskin G, Neild GH et al (2003) Pan-thames renal research group: outcome of ANCA-associated renal vasculitis: a 5-year retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis 41:776–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogan SL, Nachman PH, Wilkman AS, Jennette JC, Falk RJ (1996) Prognostic markers in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated microscopic polyangiitis and glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:23–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan-Pavlovcic S, Cerk K, Kveder R, Lindic J, Vizjak A (2003) Clinical prognostic factors of renal outcome in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)- associated glomerulonephritis in elderly patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8(Suppl 5):5–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zappitelli M, Duffy C, Bernard C, Scuccimarri R, Watanabe Duffy K, Kagan R et al (2004) Clinicopathological study of the ISN/RPS classification in childhood lupus nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 19:503–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Al Arfaj AS, Khalil N (2009) Clinical and immunological manifestations in 624 SLE patients in Saudi Arabia. Lupus 18:465–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Al Sayyari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oudah, N., Al Duhailib, Z., Alsaad, K. et al. Glomerulonephritis with crescents among adult Saudi patients outcome and its predictors. Clin Exp Med 12, 121–125 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-011-0147-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-011-0147-4

Keywords

Navigation