Abstract
Deciphering the genetic architecture of depression is pivotal for characterizing the associated pathophysiological processes and development of new therapeutics. Here we conducted a cross-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis on depression (416,437 cases and 1,308,758 controls) and identified 287 risk loci, of which 140 are new. Variant-level fine-mapping prioritized potential causal variants and functional genomic analysis identified variants that regulate the binding of transcription factors. We validated that 80% of the identified functional variants are regulatory variants and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis uncovered the potential target genes regulated by the prioritized risk variants. Gene-level analysis, including transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), proteome-wide association study (PWAS), colocalization and Mendelian randomization-based analyses, prioritized potential causal genes and drug targets. Combining evidence from different analyses revealed likely causal genes, including TMEM106B, CTNND1, EPHB2, AREL1, CSE1L, RAB27B, SATU1, TMEM258, DCC, etc. Pathway analysis showed significant enrichment of depression risk genes in synapse-related pathways. Finally, we showed that Tmem106b knockdown resulted in depression-like behaviors in mice, supporting involvement of Tmem106b in depression. Our study identified new risk loci, likely causal variants and genes for depression, providing important insights into the genetic architecture of depression and potential therapeutic targets.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was equally supported by the Key Project of Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202101AS070055) and the Distinguished Young Scientists grant of the Yunnan Province (202001AV070006).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos