Abstract
The authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to a misunderstanding about the nature of the time-dependent analysis conducted by Wolff Sagy et al. Specifically, in an exchange the authors clarified that they did not reset the time variable in their analysis of person-time among the vaccinated, but split the observation at the time of vaccination and introduced a time-dependent indicator of vaccination. The authors stand by the general point that observational studies of vaccination during an outbreak should be aware of the potential confounding effects of calendar time and immortal time bias. However, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as specific comment on the analysis of Wolff Sagy et al. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Competing Interest Statement
ML is, in addition to his academic role, Director for Science, Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This communication is in his academic capacity and does not necessarily represent the views of any government body.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a gift from the Morris-Singer Fund to the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard Chan School of Public Health and by a subcontract from US NIH grant R01GM139926
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to a missing understanding about the nature of the time-dependent analysis conducted by Wolff Sagy et al. Specifically, in an exchange the authors clarified that they did not reset the time variable in their analysis of person-time among the vaccinated, but split the observation at the time of vaccination and introduced a time-dependent indicator of vaccination. The authors stand by the general point that observational studies of vaccination during an outbreak should be aware of the potential confounding effects of calendar time and immortal time bias. However, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as specific comment on the analysis of Wolff Sagy et al. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
This revision responds to important comments from the authors of the original paper (v1) and from anonymous reviewers of v1. Notably the authors of the original paper (Wolff Sagy et al.) pointed out an important misunderstanding underlying the analysis of v1. The conclusions have significantly changed relative to that first version and we urge readers to note the updated conclusions, notably that the extent of bias inferred in the current version is less than that inferred in v1. Moreover, this version (v2) provides a broader context of the situations (using simulated data) in which bias can arise and the ability of various analytic approaches can make unbiased estimates of vaccine effectiveness.
