Abstract
Aim and Background We aimed at identifying vaccination strategies that minimize loss of life in the Covid-19 pandemic in a Europe lacking vaccines. Covid-19 mainly kills the elderly, but the pandemic is driven by social contacts that are more frequent in the young. Vaccines elicit stronger immune responses in younger persons. As vaccine production is a bottleneck, many countries have adopted a strategy of first vaccinating the elderly and vulnerable, while postponing vaccination of the young.
Methods Based on published age-stratified immunogenicity data of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine, we compared the established “one dose fits all” approach with tailored strategies by epidemic modeling: The known differential immunogenicity of vaccine doses in different age groups is exploited to vaccinate the elderly at full dose, while the young receive a reduced dose, increasing the number of individuals receiving the vaccine early. A modeling approach at European Union scale with population structure, Covid-19 case and death rates according to Europe in late January 2021 is used.
Results When the elderly were vaccinated preferentially, the pandemic initially continued essentially unchecked, as it was dominantly driven by social contacts in other age groups. Tailored strategies, including regular dosing in the elderly but reduced dose vaccination in the young, multiplied early vaccination counts, and even with some loss in protection degree for the individual person, the protective effect towards stopping the pandemic and protecting lives was enhanced, even for the elderly. In the European Union, pandemic duration (threshold >100’000 cases/day) was shortened from 53 to 18-24 days; cumulative death count over 100 days was reduced by >30’000. Data suggest that the findings may be relevant to both, the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines.
Conclusion Protecting the vulnerable, minimizing overall deaths and stopping the pandemic in Europe is best achieved by an adaptive vaccination strategy using an age-tailored vaccine dose.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Self-funded study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a modeling study, not falling under the category of clinical trial or inclusion of subjects. According to the Ethik-Kommittee Nordwestschweiz, www.eknz.ch, such studies do not fall under the juristiction of ethical committees.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: Self-funded
Conflicts of interest: None
Ethics committee approval: Not subject to ethical committee requirements
Extended methods, sensitivity analysis, and figure 3
Data Availability
A spreadsheet with daily data will be available, starting with publication in a scientific journal, for 6 months, by email request from the author, for non-commercial, scientific purposes by academic institutions and government agencies, with mandatory source attribution when used. For use of the statistical model and for other uses, contact the author directly.
