Abstract
Lateral flow device (LFD) viral antigen immunoassays have been developed around the world as diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. They have been proposed to deliver an infrastructure-light, cost-economical solution giving results within half an hour. Here we report on standardised laboratory evaluations of LFDs, and for those that met the published criteria, field testing in the Falcon-C19 research study and UK pilots (UK COVID-19 testing centres, hospital, schools, armed forces). 4/64 LFDs so far have desirable performance characteristics (Orient Gene, Deepblue, Abbott and Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test). All these LFDs have a viral antigen detection of >90% at 100,000 RNA copies/ml. 8951 Innova LFD tests were performed with a kit failure rate of 5.6% (502/8951, 95% CI: 5.1-6.1), false positive rate of 0.32% (22/6954, 95% CI: 0.20-0.48). Viral antigen detection/sensitivity across the sampling cohort when performed by laboratory scientists (156/198, 95% CI 72.4-84.3) was 78.8%. Our results suggest LFDs have promising performance characteristics for mass population testing and can be used to identify infectious positive individuals. The Innova LFD shows good viral antigen detection/sensitivity with excellent specificity, although kit failure rates and the impact of training are potential issues. These results support the expanded evaluation of LFDs, and assessment of greater access to testing on COVID-19 transmission.
Funding Department of Health and Social Care. University of Oxford. Public Health England Porton Down, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute of Health Research.
Competing Interest Statement
Declaration of interest DWE declares lecture fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work. LYWL has previously received speaker honorarium from the Merck group and Servier for unrelated work. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding Statement
Funding statement DSL is supported by the NIHR Community Healthcare MedTech and In vitro Diagnostic Cooperative and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands. LYWL, DWC, TEAP, AV, SJH, ASW and HLP are supported by the NIHR Oxford BRC. DWC and NS are supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections at University of Oxford (NIHR200915) in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). KKC is Medical Research Foundation-funded. DWC, ASW and TEAP are NIHR Senior Investigators. PCM is funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant 110110/Z/15/Z). Falcon-C19 is a project funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). DWE is a Robertson Foundation Big Data Institute Fellow. SFL is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Fellowship. The report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Wellcome Trust and the Department of Health. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, Wellcome Trust, the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health or Public Health England.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research was performed within the FALCON-C19 study (Facilitating Accelerated Clinical validation Of Novel diagnostics for COVID-19, 20/WA/0169, IRAS 284229) and the Respiratory Diagnostic Kit Evaluation (Red Kite) study (Research Ethics Committee reference: 19/NW/0730, North West-Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The abstract and labelling of one of the lateral flow devices (LFD) have been updated. The LFD previously labelled as 'LFDx' is now named 'Abbott' (Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device).
Data Availability
Data is available upon request and at the discretion of the corresponding author.
