Abstract
Background Little research has explored the influence of social context on hemoglobin levels among Indian adolescents. We conceptualized community-level women’s education (proxy for value placed on women’s wellbeing) as exerting contextual influence on adolescent hemoglobin level.
Methods We used the Indian National Family Health Survey 2015-16 data (62,648 adolescents aged 15-17 years). We fit multilevel random intercepts linear regression models to test the association of village- and urban-ward-level-women’s education with hemoglobin of adolescents, accounting for own and their mother’s education; plus relevant covariates.
Findings Our fully adjusted model estimated that if the 45% of communities with fewer than ten percent of women having a tenth-grade education in our sample were to achieve 100% high school completion in women, the average hemoglobin of all adolescents in such communities would be 0·22 g/dl higher (p<0·01). Unexplained variance at the contextual level remained statistically significant, indicating the importance of context on adolescent hemoglobin.
Interpretations Adolescents are deeply embedded in their context, influenced by contextual factors affecting health. Promoting adolescent health therefore implies altering social norms related to adolescent health and health behaviors; along with structural changes creating a health-promoting environment. Integrating our empirical findings with theoretically plausible understanding of the pathways connecting community-level women’s education with adolescent hemoglobin, we suggest that enhancing community-level women’s education beyond high school is necessary to facilitate these processes.
Implications Addressing contextual determinants of adolescent hemoglobin might be the missing link in India’s adolescent anemia prevention efforts, which are focused heavily on individual-level biomedical determinants of the problem.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Not Applicable
Funding Statement
No external funding was received by the authors for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Review Board at the International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India granted the NFHS 4 project ethical approvals before the surveys were conducted. Written informed consent were obtained from participants during the surveys. We carried out secondary data analysis of publicly available deidentified data collected as a part of NFHS 4 India, accessed from DHS Program website. Necessary approvals were sought from DHS Program to use NFHS 4 data for this project.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
We have used publicly available, National Family Health Survey India 2015-16 data: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16 [Dataset] Accessed from https://dhsprogram.com/ on 7/11/2019. For query contact Ankita R. Shah at ankita.shah{at}iitgn.ac.in
