Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted primarily through close, person-to-person interactions. In the absence of a vaccine, interventions focused on physical distancing have been widely used to reduce community transmission. These physical distancing policies can only control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 if they are able to reduce the amount of close interpersonal contact in a population. To quantify the impact of these policies over the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, we conducted three waves of contact surveys between March 22 and June 23, 2020. We find that rates of interpersonal contact have been dramatically reduced at all ages in the US, with an 82% (95% CI:80% - 83%) reduction in the average number of daily contacts observed during the first wave compared to pre-pandemic levels. We find that this decline reduced the reproduction number, R0, to below one in March and early April (0.66, 95% CI:0.35 - 0.88). However, with easing of physical distancing measures, we find increases in interpersonal contact rates over the subsequent two waves, pushing R0 above 1. We also find significant differences in numbers of reported contacts by age, gender, race and ethnicity. Certain demographic groups, including people under 45, males, and Black and Hispanic respondents, have significantly higher contact rates than the rest of the population. Tracking changes in interpersonal contact patterns can provide rapid assessments of the impact of physical distancing policies over the course of the pandemic and help identify at-risk populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Seed funding was provided by a Berkeley Population Center pilot grant (NICHD P2CHD073964)
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have updated the manuscript with more recent data and additional analyses.
* For helpful feedback on these results, we thank participants in the April 1, 2020 Berkeley Population Center Brown Bag, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Caroline Buckee, and Audrey Dorelien. Seed funding was provided by a Berkeley Population Center pilot grant (NICHD P2CHD073964).
Data Availability
Our dashboard has the estimated mixing matrices, and we intend to provide a public-use version of the survey microdata as soon as possible.