PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Brigid Brown
AU  - Pauline Magsaysay
AU  - Yves Bureau
AU  - Janice Yu
AU  - Shalini Dhir
TI  - Paracoracoid versus Costoclavicular Approach to Infraclavicular Block: A Prospective, Two Arm, Parallel design, Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial
AID  - 10.1101/2020.10.03.20202275
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.10.03.20202275
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/06/2020.10.03.20202275.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/06/2020.10.03.20202275.full
AB  - Introduction Paracoracoid approach to the brachial plexus block is the conventional infraclavicular technique for upper limb surgeries. In this approach, the ultrasound transducer is placed in the parasagittal plane below the clavicle, medial to the coracoid process. In this view, three cords are separated from each other and are rarely visualized in a single ultrasound window. In the costoclavicular approach, the ultrasound transducer is placed parallel to and below the clavicle. In this view, the cords are clustered together, at a more superficial level. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare these two infraclavicular brachial plexus approaches.Methods Seventy patients were randomized to receive either a paracoracoid or costoclavicular infraclavicular block. Both groups received 35 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was sensory block onset time while secondary outcomes included performance times, complications during block insertion (paresthesia, vascular puncture, pleural puncture), block failure, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications. Telephone follow-up was done 24 h and 7 days later.Results Sensory block onset time was significantly shorter in the paracoracoid group 18.7 (4.4) min versus 22.2 (6.2) min (p=0.045). Block success at 30 minutes was the same between both groups. There was no difference in any secondary outcomes.Conclusions This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the novel costoclavicular approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus block had similar procedure time, block success and similar complication rates for upper limb surgery when compared to the traditional paracoracoid technique. However, it resulted in longer sensory block onset time.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT02657291Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:#106875, Western University, London, Ontario, CanadaAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw data is available from the corresponding author but is not available as a direct URL.