RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SMORASO-DT : A hybrid machine learning classification model to classify individuals based on working memory load in mental arithmetic task
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.02.20205922
DO 10.1101/2020.10.02.20205922
A1 Shivabalan, K R
A1 Deb, Brototo
A1 Goel, Shivam
A1 Arivan, R
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/05/2020.10.02.20205922.abstract
AB Nonlinear dynamics and chaos theory are being widely used nowadays in neuroscience to characterize complex systems within which the change of the output is not proportional to the change applied at the input. Such nonlinear systems compared to linear systems, often appear chaotic, unpredictable, or counterintuitive, however, yet their behaviour is not mapped out as random. Thus, hidden potential of the dynamical properties of the physiological phenomenon can be detected by these approaches especially to elucidate the complex human brain activity gathered from the electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. As it is known, brain is a chaotic dynamical system and its generated EEG signals are generally chaotic because, with respect to time, the amplitude changes continuously. A reliable and non-invasive measurement of memory load, to measure continuously while performing a cognitive task, is highly desirable to assess cognitive functions, crucial for prevention of decision-making errors. Such measurements help to keep up the efficiency and productivity in task completion, work performance, and to avoid cognitive overload, especially at high mental or physical workload places like traffic control, military operations, and rescue commands. In this work, we have measured the linear and nonlinear dynamics of the EEG signals in subjects undergoing mental arithmetic task. Further, we have also differentiated the subjects who can perform a mental task good or bad, and developed a hybrid machine learning model, the SMORASO-DT (SMOte + Random forest + lASso-Decision Tree), to differentiate good and bad performers during n-back task state with an accuracy rate of 78%.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Bioethics Commission of Educational and Scientific Centre :Institute of Biology and Medicine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Conclusion from 15 August 2018, project title :Detrended fluctuation analysis of activation re-arrangement in EEG dynamics during cognitive workload). Each subject signed written informed consent following the World Medical Association (WMA) declaration of Helsinki of 1975 (http://www.wma.net/Data 2019, 4, 14 5 of 6 en/30publications/10policies/b3/), revised in 2008, the Declaration of Principles on Tolerance (28th session of the General Conference of UNESCO, Paris, 16 November 1995), the Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo, 4 April 1997).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data analysed in the study are available to the reader on reasonable request. https://physionet.org/content/eegmat/1.0.0/