PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hussein, Taha AU - Dureab, Fekri AU - Al-Waziza, Raof AU - Noman, Hanan AU - Hennig, Lisa AU - Jahn, Albrecht TI - The impact of the fragile health system on the implementation of health policies in Yemen AID - 10.1101/2020.09.25.20200741 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.25.20200741 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/25/2020.09.25.20200741.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/25/2020.09.25.20200741.full AB - Background The on-going humanitarian crisis in Yemen is one of the worst in the world, with more than14 million people in acute need. The conflict in Yemen deteriorated the country’s already fragile health system and lead to the collapse of more than half of the health facilities. Health system fragmentation is also a problem in Yemen, which is complicated by the existence of two health ministries with different strategies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of health system fragmentation on the implementation of health policies in Yemen across the global agendas of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), Health Security (GHS) and Health Promotion (HP) in the context of WHO’s priorities achieving universal health coverage, addressing health emergencies and promoting healthier populations.Methods The study is qualitative research using key informant in-depth interviews and documents analysis.Results There are many health stakeholders in Yemen, including the public, private, and NGO sectors - each with different priorities and interests, which did not always align with national policies and strategies. The WHO and Ministry of Public Health and Population (MoPHP) are the main supporters to implement all policies related to the UHC, GHS and HP agendas. Interestingly, initiatives initially pursuing a health security approach to control the cholera epidemic realigned with the UHC concept and moved from an initial focus on health security, to propose a minimum health service package, a classical UHC intervention. Overall, Universal Health Coverage is the most adapted agenda, health security agendas were highly disrupted due to conflicts and health staffs were caught unprepared for emerging outbreaks. The health promotion agenda was largely ignored.Conclusion Restoring peace, building on synergies between the three health agendas through joint planning between the MoPHP and other health actors are highly recommended.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding Statementno external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available on request