RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Continuous digital collection of patient-reported outcomes during inpatient treatment for affective disorders – implementation and feasibility
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.08.27.20183400
DO 10.1101/2020.08.27.20183400
A1 Richter, Maike
A1 Storck, Michael
A1 Blitz, Rogério
A1 Goltermann, Janik
A1 Seipp, Juliana
A1 Dannlowski, Udo
A1 Baune, Bernhard T.
A1 Dugas, Martin
A1 Opel, Nils
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/01/2020.08.27.20183400.abstract
AB Multivariate predictive models have revealed promising results for the individual prediction of treatment response, relapse risk as well as for the differential diagnosis in affective disorders. Yet, in order to translate personalized predictive modelling from the research context to psychiatric clinical routine, standardized collection of information of sufficient detail and temporal resolution in day-to-day clinical care is needed, based on which machine learning algorithms can be trained. Digital collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is a time- and cost-efficient approach to gain such data throughout the treatment course. However, it remains unclear whether patients with severe affective disorders are willing and able to participate in such efforts, whether the feasibility of such systems might vary depending on individual patient characteristics and if digitally acquired patient-reported outcomes are of sufficient diagnostic validity. To address these questions, we implemented a system for continuous digital collection of patient-reported outcomes via tablet computers throughout inpatient treatment for affective disorders at the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Münster. 364 affective disorder patients were approached, 66.5% of which could be recruited to participate in the study. An average of four assessments were completed during the treatment course, none of the participants dropped out of the study prematurely. 89.3% of participants did not require additional support during data entry. Need of support with tablet handling and slower data entry pace was predicted by older age, whereas depression severity at baseline did not influence these measures. Patient-reported outcomes of depression severity showed high agreement with standardized external assessments by a clinical interviewer. Our results indicate that continuous digital collection of patient-reported outcomes is a feasible, accessible and valid method for longitudinal data collection in psychiatric routine, which will eventually facilitate the identification of individual risk and resilience factors for affective disorders and pave the way towards personalized psychiatric care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding was provided by the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) of the medical faculty of Muenster (Grant SEED 11/19 to NO), as well as the Innovative Medizinische Forschung (IMF) of the medical faculty of Muenster (Grants OP121710 to NO).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethik-Kommission der Aerztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Westfaelischen Wilhelms-Universitaet, Muenster, GermanyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDerived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.