RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Are digital technology interventions effective to reduce loneliness in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.08.27.20183012
DO 10.1101/2020.08.27.20183012
A1 Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
A1 David Nogueras
A1 Hugo Cornelis van Woerden
A1 Vasiliki Kiparoglou
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/01/2020.08.27.20183012.abstract
AB Objective To review the latest literature on the effectiveness of DTIs in reducing loneliness in (older) adults.Data Sources Electronic searches in PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and Web of Science covering publication period from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2019.Subjects Adult men and womenDesign Systematic review and meta-analysisMain Outcome Measure Loneliness.Study Selection Primary studies that used DTIs for tackling loneliness in adults (aged ≥18 years) with follow-up measurements at least three months or more and publication in the English language.Data Extraction and Synthesis Two researchers independently screened articles and extracted data on several variables: participants, interventions, comparators and outcomes. Data was extracted on the primary outcome i.e. loneliness measured at the baseline and follow-up measurements at three, four, six and twelve months after the intervention.Results Six studies were selected from 4939 articles screened. Selected studies included 5 clinical trials (4 RCTs and 1 quasi experimental study) and one before and after study, which enrolled 646 participants (men =154 (24%), women =427 (66%), no gender information =65 (10%) with average age between 73 and 78 years (SD 6-11). Five clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis and standardised mean differences (SMD) were calculated for each trial and pooled across studies using a random effects model. The overall effect estimates were not statistically significant in follow-up measurements at three months (SMD= 0.02, 95% CI= −0.36, 0.40; P=0.92), four months (SMDs= −1.11, 95% CI= - 2.60, 0.38; P=0.14) and six months (SMD= −0.11, 95% CI= −0.54, 0.32; P=0.61). The quality of evidence was very low to moderate in these trials.Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to make conclusions that DTIs are effective in reducing loneliness in older adults. Future research may consider RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer duration of interventions and follow-up.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded/supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (Research Grant No. IS-BRC-1215-20008). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a systematic review and meta-analysis hences IRB or ethics committee approval was not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are reported in the manuscript.